单侧电力市场有限状态自动机下发电公司自适应竞价策略研究

G. Sheblé, G. Gutiérrez-Alcaraz
{"title":"单侧电力市场有限状态自动机下发电公司自适应竞价策略研究","authors":"G. Sheblé, G. Gutiérrez-Alcaraz","doi":"10.1002/ETEP.605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \nThis paper explores the use of genetic algorithms (GAs) in the development of the bidding strategies used by generation companies under two different market clearing mechanisms, uniform pricing and pay-as-bid pricing. The bidding strategies are represented by two modifications of a classical data processing structure known as finite-state automata. Semi-fixed fitness function and co-evolutionary fitness function were incorporated in our GA. A third simple representation to obtain a comparison baseline for the other two representations, showing how their behaviors compare with a “standard” solution, was also incorporated. The strategies developed by our method were adaptive, and all GA types were based on maximizing profit in a competitive bidding situation. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":50474,"journal":{"name":"European Transactions on Electrical Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ETEP.605","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generation companies' adaptive bidding strategies using finite-state automata in a single-sided electricity market\",\"authors\":\"G. Sheblé, G. Gutiérrez-Alcaraz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ETEP.605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY \\n \\nThis paper explores the use of genetic algorithms (GAs) in the development of the bidding strategies used by generation companies under two different market clearing mechanisms, uniform pricing and pay-as-bid pricing. The bidding strategies are represented by two modifications of a classical data processing structure known as finite-state automata. Semi-fixed fitness function and co-evolutionary fitness function were incorporated in our GA. A third simple representation to obtain a comparison baseline for the other two representations, showing how their behaviors compare with a “standard” solution, was also incorporated. The strategies developed by our method were adaptive, and all GA types were based on maximizing profit in a competitive bidding situation. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Transactions on Electrical Power\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ETEP.605\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Transactions on Electrical Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ETEP.605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transactions on Electrical Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ETEP.605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文探讨了在两种不同的市场清算机制——统一定价和按出价付费——下,发电公司使用遗传算法(GAs)制定竞标策略。投标策略通过对经典数据处理结构有限状态自动机的两种修改来表示。在遗传算法中引入了半固定适应度函数和协同进化适应度函数。还包含了第三个简单表示,用于获得其他两个表示的比较基线,显示它们的行为与“标准”解决方案的比较情况。我们的方法开发的策略是自适应的,所有的遗传类型都是基于竞争投标情况下的利润最大化。版权所有©2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generation companies' adaptive bidding strategies using finite-state automata in a single-sided electricity market
SUMMARY This paper explores the use of genetic algorithms (GAs) in the development of the bidding strategies used by generation companies under two different market clearing mechanisms, uniform pricing and pay-as-bid pricing. The bidding strategies are represented by two modifications of a classical data processing structure known as finite-state automata. Semi-fixed fitness function and co-evolutionary fitness function were incorporated in our GA. A third simple representation to obtain a comparison baseline for the other two representations, showing how their behaviors compare with a “standard” solution, was also incorporated. The strategies developed by our method were adaptive, and all GA types were based on maximizing profit in a competitive bidding situation. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Transactions on Electrical Power
European Transactions on Electrical Power 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5.4 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信