地下水中常见离子对磁铁矿去除铬酸盐的影响:铬酸盐吸附的重要性

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Amanda H. Meena, Yuji Arai
{"title":"地下水中常见离子对磁铁矿去除铬酸盐的影响:铬酸盐吸附的重要性","authors":"Amanda H. Meena,&nbsp;Yuji Arai","doi":"10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reductive precipitation of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with magnetite is a well-known Cr(VI) remediation method to improve water quality. The rapid (&lt;a few hr) reduction of soluble Cr(VI) to insoluble Cr(III) species by Fe(II) in magnetite has been the primary focus of the Cr(VI) removal process in the past. However, the contribution of simultaneous Cr(VI) adsorption processes in aged magnetite has been largely ignored, leaving uncertainties in evaluating the application of in situ Cr remediation technologies for aqueous systems. In this study, effects of common groundwater ions (i.e., nitrate and sulfate) on Cr(VI) sorption to magnetite were investigated using batch geochemical experiments in conjunction with X-ray absorption spectroscopy.</p><p>In both nitrate and sulfate electrolytes, batch sorption experiments showed that Cr(VI) sorption decreases with increasing pH from 4 to 8. In this pH range, Cr(VI) sorption decreased with increasing ionic strength of sulfate from 0.01 to 0.1?M whereas nitrate concentrations did not alter the Cr(VI) sorption behavior. This indicates the background electrolyte specific Cr(VI) sorption process in magnetite. Under the same ionic strength, Cr(VI) removal in sulfate containing solutions was greater than that in nitrate solutions. This is because the oxidation of Fe(II) by nitrate is more thermodynamically favorable than by sulfate, leaving less reduction capacity of magnetite to reduce Cr(VI) in the nitrate media. X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis supports the macroscopic evidence that more than 75?% of total Cr on the magnetite surfaces was adsorbed Cr(VI) species after 48?h.</p><p>This experimental geochemical study showed that the adsorption process of Cr(VI) anions was as important as the reductive precipitation of Cr(III) in describing the removal of Cr(VI) by magnetite, and these interfacial adsorption processes could be impacted by common groundwater ions like sulfate and nitrate. The results of this study highlight new information about the large quantity of adsorbed Cr(VI) surface complexes at the magnetite-water interface. It has implications for predicting the long-term stability of Cr at the magnetite-water interface.</p>","PeriodicalId":12694,"journal":{"name":"Geochemical Transactions","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption\",\"authors\":\"Amanda H. Meena,&nbsp;Yuji Arai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Reductive precipitation of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with magnetite is a well-known Cr(VI) remediation method to improve water quality. The rapid (&lt;a few hr) reduction of soluble Cr(VI) to insoluble Cr(III) species by Fe(II) in magnetite has been the primary focus of the Cr(VI) removal process in the past. However, the contribution of simultaneous Cr(VI) adsorption processes in aged magnetite has been largely ignored, leaving uncertainties in evaluating the application of in situ Cr remediation technologies for aqueous systems. In this study, effects of common groundwater ions (i.e., nitrate and sulfate) on Cr(VI) sorption to magnetite were investigated using batch geochemical experiments in conjunction with X-ray absorption spectroscopy.</p><p>In both nitrate and sulfate electrolytes, batch sorption experiments showed that Cr(VI) sorption decreases with increasing pH from 4 to 8. In this pH range, Cr(VI) sorption decreased with increasing ionic strength of sulfate from 0.01 to 0.1?M whereas nitrate concentrations did not alter the Cr(VI) sorption behavior. This indicates the background electrolyte specific Cr(VI) sorption process in magnetite. Under the same ionic strength, Cr(VI) removal in sulfate containing solutions was greater than that in nitrate solutions. This is because the oxidation of Fe(II) by nitrate is more thermodynamically favorable than by sulfate, leaving less reduction capacity of magnetite to reduce Cr(VI) in the nitrate media. X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis supports the macroscopic evidence that more than 75?% of total Cr on the magnetite surfaces was adsorbed Cr(VI) species after 48?h.</p><p>This experimental geochemical study showed that the adsorption process of Cr(VI) anions was as important as the reductive precipitation of Cr(III) in describing the removal of Cr(VI) by magnetite, and these interfacial adsorption processes could be impacted by common groundwater ions like sulfate and nitrate. The results of this study highlight new information about the large quantity of adsorbed Cr(VI) surface complexes at the magnetite-water interface. It has implications for predicting the long-term stability of Cr at the magnetite-water interface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemical Transactions\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemical Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemical Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

磁铁矿还原沉淀六价铬(Cr(VI))是一种众所周知的改善水质的Cr(VI)修复方法。磁铁矿中可溶Cr(VI)被Fe(II)快速(<几个小时)还原为不溶Cr(III),一直是Cr(VI)去除过程的主要焦点。然而,同时吸附Cr(VI)的过程在老化磁铁矿中的作用在很大程度上被忽视了,这给评价原位Cr修复技术在水系统中的应用留下了不确定性。本研究采用间歇式地球化学实验结合x射线吸收光谱法,研究了地下水中常见离子(即硝酸盐和硫酸盐)对磁铁矿吸附Cr(VI)的影响。在硝酸盐和硫酸盐电解质中,随pH值从4增加到8,Cr(VI)的吸附量减小。在此pH范围内,随着硫酸盐离子强度从0.01增加到0.1?而硝酸盐浓度对Cr(VI)的吸附行为没有影响。这表明背景电解质对磁铁矿中Cr(VI)的吸附过程具有特异性。在相同离子强度下,含硫酸盐溶液对Cr(VI)的去除率大于硝酸盐溶液。这是因为硝酸盐对Fe(II)的氧化比硫酸盐对Fe(II)的氧化在热力学上更有利,使得磁铁矿在硝酸盐介质中还原Cr(VI)的能力更弱。x射线吸收光谱分析支持宏观证据,超过75?48h后,磁铁矿表面总Cr的%被Cr(VI)吸附。本实验地球化学研究表明,在描述磁铁矿对Cr(VI)的去除过程中,Cr(VI)阴离子的吸附过程与Cr(III)的还原沉淀同样重要,并且这些界面吸附过程会受到硫酸盐和硝酸盐等常见地下水离子的影响。本研究结果强调了磁铁矿-水界面上大量吸附Cr(VI)表面配合物的新信息。这对预测Cr在磁铁矿-水界面的长期稳定性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption

Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption

Reductive precipitation of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with magnetite is a well-known Cr(VI) remediation method to improve water quality. The rapid (<a few hr) reduction of soluble Cr(VI) to insoluble Cr(III) species by Fe(II) in magnetite has been the primary focus of the Cr(VI) removal process in the past. However, the contribution of simultaneous Cr(VI) adsorption processes in aged magnetite has been largely ignored, leaving uncertainties in evaluating the application of in situ Cr remediation technologies for aqueous systems. In this study, effects of common groundwater ions (i.e., nitrate and sulfate) on Cr(VI) sorption to magnetite were investigated using batch geochemical experiments in conjunction with X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

In both nitrate and sulfate electrolytes, batch sorption experiments showed that Cr(VI) sorption decreases with increasing pH from 4 to 8. In this pH range, Cr(VI) sorption decreased with increasing ionic strength of sulfate from 0.01 to 0.1?M whereas nitrate concentrations did not alter the Cr(VI) sorption behavior. This indicates the background electrolyte specific Cr(VI) sorption process in magnetite. Under the same ionic strength, Cr(VI) removal in sulfate containing solutions was greater than that in nitrate solutions. This is because the oxidation of Fe(II) by nitrate is more thermodynamically favorable than by sulfate, leaving less reduction capacity of magnetite to reduce Cr(VI) in the nitrate media. X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis supports the macroscopic evidence that more than 75?% of total Cr on the magnetite surfaces was adsorbed Cr(VI) species after 48?h.

This experimental geochemical study showed that the adsorption process of Cr(VI) anions was as important as the reductive precipitation of Cr(III) in describing the removal of Cr(VI) by magnetite, and these interfacial adsorption processes could be impacted by common groundwater ions like sulfate and nitrate. The results of this study highlight new information about the large quantity of adsorbed Cr(VI) surface complexes at the magnetite-water interface. It has implications for predicting the long-term stability of Cr at the magnetite-water interface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochemical Transactions
Geochemical Transactions 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geochemical Transactions publishes high-quality research in all areas of chemistry as it relates to materials and processes occurring in terrestrial and extraterrestrial systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信