注CO2、N2和CO2/N2混合气,提高页岩气采收率和二氧化碳地质封存

IF 3.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Jianfa Wu, Haoran Hu, Cheng Chang, Deliang Zhang, Jian Zhang, Shengxian Zhao, Bo Wang, Qiushi Zhang, Yiming Chen, Fanhua Zeng
{"title":"注CO2、N2和CO2/N2混合气,提高页岩气采收率和二氧化碳地质封存","authors":"Jianfa Wu,&nbsp;Haoran Hu,&nbsp;Cheng Chang,&nbsp;Deliang Zhang,&nbsp;Jian Zhang,&nbsp;Shengxian Zhao,&nbsp;Bo Wang,&nbsp;Qiushi Zhang,&nbsp;Yiming Chen,&nbsp;Fanhua Zeng","doi":"10.1007/s11708-023-0865-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this work, using fractured shale cores, isothermal adsorption experiments and core flooding tests were conducted to investigate the performance of injecting different gases to enhance shale gas recovery and CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage efficiency under real reservoir conditions. The adsorption process of shale to different gases was in agreement with the extended-Langmuir model, and the adsorption capacity of CO<sub>2</sub> was the largest, followed by CH<sub>4</sub>, and that of N<sub>2</sub> was the smallest of the three pure gases. In addition, when the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in the mixed gas exceeded 50%, the adsorption capacity of the mixed gas was greater than that of CH<sub>4</sub>, and had a strong competitive adsorption effect. For the core flooding tests, pure gas injection showed that the breakthrough time of CO<sub>2</sub> was longer than that of N<sub>2</sub>, and the CH<sub>4</sub> recovery factor at the breakthrough time <span>\\(\\left({{R_{{\\rm{C}}{{\\rm{H}}_4}}}} \\right)\\)</span> was also higher than that of N<sub>2</sub>. The <span>\\({R_{{\\rm{C}}{{\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\)</span> of CO<sub>2</sub> gas injection was approximately 44.09%, while the <span>\\({R_{{\\rm{C}}{{\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\)</span> of N<sub>2</sub> was only 31.63%. For CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> mixed gas injection, with the increase of CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, the <span>\\({R_{{\\rm{C}}{{\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\)</span> increased, and the <span>\\({R_{{\\rm{C}}{{\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\)</span> for mixed gas CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> = 8:2 was close to that of pure CO<sub>2</sub>, about 40.24%. Moreover, the breakthrough time of N<sub>2</sub> in mixed gas was not much different from that when pure N2 was injected, while the breakthrough time of CO<sub>2</sub> was prolonged, which indicated that with the increase of N<sub>2</sub> concentration in the mixed gas, the breakthrough time of CO<sub>2</sub> could be extended. Furthermore, an abnormal surge of N<sub>2</sub> concentration in the produced gas was observed after N<sub>2</sub> breakthrough. In regards to CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency <span>\\(\\left({{S_{{\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\rm{O}}_2}}}} \\right)\\)</span>, as the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration increased, <span>\\({S_{{\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\rm{O}}_2}}}\\)</span> also increased. The <span>\\({S_{{\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\rm{O}}_2}}}\\)</span> of the pure CO<sub>2</sub> gas injection was about 35.96%, while for mixed gas CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> = 8:2, <span>\\({S_{{\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\rm{O}}_2}}}\\)</span> was about 32.28%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":570,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Energy","volume":"17 3","pages":"428 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CO2, N2, and CO2/N2 mixed gas injection for enhanced shale gas recovery and CO2 geological storage\",\"authors\":\"Jianfa Wu,&nbsp;Haoran Hu,&nbsp;Cheng Chang,&nbsp;Deliang Zhang,&nbsp;Jian Zhang,&nbsp;Shengxian Zhao,&nbsp;Bo Wang,&nbsp;Qiushi Zhang,&nbsp;Yiming Chen,&nbsp;Fanhua Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11708-023-0865-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this work, using fractured shale cores, isothermal adsorption experiments and core flooding tests were conducted to investigate the performance of injecting different gases to enhance shale gas recovery and CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage efficiency under real reservoir conditions. The adsorption process of shale to different gases was in agreement with the extended-Langmuir model, and the adsorption capacity of CO<sub>2</sub> was the largest, followed by CH<sub>4</sub>, and that of N<sub>2</sub> was the smallest of the three pure gases. In addition, when the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in the mixed gas exceeded 50%, the adsorption capacity of the mixed gas was greater than that of CH<sub>4</sub>, and had a strong competitive adsorption effect. For the core flooding tests, pure gas injection showed that the breakthrough time of CO<sub>2</sub> was longer than that of N<sub>2</sub>, and the CH<sub>4</sub> recovery factor at the breakthrough time <span>\\\\(\\\\left({{R_{{\\\\rm{C}}{{\\\\rm{H}}_4}}}} \\\\right)\\\\)</span> was also higher than that of N<sub>2</sub>. The <span>\\\\({R_{{\\\\rm{C}}{{\\\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\\\)</span> of CO<sub>2</sub> gas injection was approximately 44.09%, while the <span>\\\\({R_{{\\\\rm{C}}{{\\\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\\\)</span> of N<sub>2</sub> was only 31.63%. For CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> mixed gas injection, with the increase of CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, the <span>\\\\({R_{{\\\\rm{C}}{{\\\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\\\)</span> increased, and the <span>\\\\({R_{{\\\\rm{C}}{{\\\\rm{H}}_4}}}\\\\)</span> for mixed gas CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> = 8:2 was close to that of pure CO<sub>2</sub>, about 40.24%. Moreover, the breakthrough time of N<sub>2</sub> in mixed gas was not much different from that when pure N2 was injected, while the breakthrough time of CO<sub>2</sub> was prolonged, which indicated that with the increase of N<sub>2</sub> concentration in the mixed gas, the breakthrough time of CO<sub>2</sub> could be extended. Furthermore, an abnormal surge of N<sub>2</sub> concentration in the produced gas was observed after N<sub>2</sub> breakthrough. In regards to CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency <span>\\\\(\\\\left({{S_{{\\\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\\\rm{O}}_2}}}} \\\\right)\\\\)</span>, as the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration increased, <span>\\\\({S_{{\\\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\\\rm{O}}_2}}}\\\\)</span> also increased. The <span>\\\\({S_{{\\\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\\\rm{O}}_2}}}\\\\)</span> of the pure CO<sub>2</sub> gas injection was about 35.96%, while for mixed gas CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> = 8:2, <span>\\\\({S_{{\\\\rm{storage - C}}{{\\\\rm{O}}_2}}}\\\\)</span> was about 32.28%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"428 - 445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11708-023-0865-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11708-023-0865-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用裂缝型页岩岩心,通过等温吸附实验和岩心驱油试验,研究了在真实储层条件下注入不同气体提高页岩气采收率和CO2地质储气效率的效果。页岩对不同气体的吸附过程符合扩展langmuir模型,3种纯气体中CO2吸附量最大,CH4次之,N2吸附量最小。此外,当混合气体中的CO2浓度超过50%, the adsorption capacity of the mixed gas was greater than that of CH4, and had a strong competitive adsorption effect. For the core flooding tests, pure gas injection showed that the breakthrough time of CO2 was longer than that of N2, and the CH4 recovery factor at the breakthrough time \(\left({{R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}} \right)\) was also higher than that of N2. The \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) of CO2 gas injection was approximately 44.09%, while the \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) of N2 was only 31.63%. For CO2/N2 mixed gas injection, with the increase of CO2 concentration, the \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) increased, and the \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) for mixed gas CO2/N2 = 8:2 was close to that of pure CO2, about 40.24%. Moreover, the breakthrough time of N2 in mixed gas was not much different from that when pure N2 was injected, while the breakthrough time of CO2 was prolonged, which indicated that with the increase of N2 concentration in the mixed gas, the breakthrough time of CO2 could be extended. Furthermore, an abnormal surge of N2 concentration in the produced gas was observed after N2 breakthrough. In regards to CO2 storage efficiency \(\left({{S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}} \right)\), as the CO2 concentration increased, \({S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}\) also increased. The \({S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}\) of the pure CO2 gas injection was about 35.96%, while for mixed gas CO2/N2 = 8:2, \({S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}\) was about 32.28%.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CO2, N2, and CO2/N2 mixed gas injection for enhanced shale gas recovery and CO2 geological storage

In this work, using fractured shale cores, isothermal adsorption experiments and core flooding tests were conducted to investigate the performance of injecting different gases to enhance shale gas recovery and CO2 geological storage efficiency under real reservoir conditions. The adsorption process of shale to different gases was in agreement with the extended-Langmuir model, and the adsorption capacity of CO2 was the largest, followed by CH4, and that of N2 was the smallest of the three pure gases. In addition, when the CO2 concentration in the mixed gas exceeded 50%, the adsorption capacity of the mixed gas was greater than that of CH4, and had a strong competitive adsorption effect. For the core flooding tests, pure gas injection showed that the breakthrough time of CO2 was longer than that of N2, and the CH4 recovery factor at the breakthrough time \(\left({{R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}} \right)\) was also higher than that of N2. The \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) of CO2 gas injection was approximately 44.09%, while the \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) of N2 was only 31.63%. For CO2/N2 mixed gas injection, with the increase of CO2 concentration, the \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) increased, and the \({R_{{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_4}}}\) for mixed gas CO2/N2 = 8:2 was close to that of pure CO2, about 40.24%. Moreover, the breakthrough time of N2 in mixed gas was not much different from that when pure N2 was injected, while the breakthrough time of CO2 was prolonged, which indicated that with the increase of N2 concentration in the mixed gas, the breakthrough time of CO2 could be extended. Furthermore, an abnormal surge of N2 concentration in the produced gas was observed after N2 breakthrough. In regards to CO2 storage efficiency \(\left({{S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}} \right)\), as the CO2 concentration increased, \({S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}\) also increased. The \({S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}\) of the pure CO2 gas injection was about 35.96%, while for mixed gas CO2/N2 = 8:2, \({S_{{\rm{storage - C}}{{\rm{O}}_2}}}\) was about 32.28%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Energy
Frontiers in Energy Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
708
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Energy, an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed international journal launched in January 2007, seeks to provide a rapid and unique platform for reporting the most advanced research on energy technology and strategic thinking in order to promote timely communication between researchers, scientists, engineers, and policy makers in the field of energy. Frontiers in Energy aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information for analyses, reviews and evaluations in energy engineering and research, with a strong focus on energy analysis, energy modelling and prediction, integrated energy systems, energy conversion and conservation, energy planning and energy on economic and policy issues. Frontiers in Energy publishes state-of-the-art review articles, original research papers and short communications by individual researchers or research groups. It is strictly peer-reviewed and accepts only original submissions in English. The scope of the journal is broad and covers all latest focus in current energy research. High-quality papers are solicited in, but are not limited to the following areas: -Fundamental energy science -Energy technology, including energy generation, conversion, storage, renewables, transport, urban design and building efficiency -Energy and the environment, including pollution control, energy efficiency and climate change -Energy economics, strategy and policy -Emerging energy issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信