医疗专业人员和辅助人员的职业压力和工作环境概况:统一后十年

B. Kirkcaldy, L. Petersen, R. Trimpop
{"title":"医疗专业人员和辅助人员的职业压力和工作环境概况:统一后十年","authors":"B. Kirkcaldy, L. Petersen, R. Trimpop","doi":"10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<287::AID-SMI875>3.0.CO;2-O","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a large survey of medical practitioners and their auxiliary personnel, significant differences were observed in the job stress profiles of individuals from the new (former East Germany) and old Federal States (former West Germany). Self-reported occupational stress was perceived higher among those from the new vs old Federal States, and this was particularly pronounced for those States with their borders in close proximity to the former West Germany. Satisfaction at work was no different for the new and old Federal States, although the evaluation of working climate was deemed more favourable in the newer Federal States. Moreover, the new Federal States were more inclined to adopt low risk-taking and more safety-oriented attitudes than their counterparts in the older Federal States. Conversely, there were no significant differences in accident rate (either at work or whilst driving) between the two categories (new vs old Federal States). Overall, the study shows that subjective experiences of psychological and social processes in the working context remain pronounced 10 years after reunification.","PeriodicalId":82818,"journal":{"name":"Stress medicine","volume":"601 ","pages":"287-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<287::AID-SMI875>3.0.CO;2-O","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational stress and working climate profiles of medical professionals and auxiliary personnel : ten years after reunification\",\"authors\":\"B. Kirkcaldy, L. Petersen, R. Trimpop\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<287::AID-SMI875>3.0.CO;2-O\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a large survey of medical practitioners and their auxiliary personnel, significant differences were observed in the job stress profiles of individuals from the new (former East Germany) and old Federal States (former West Germany). Self-reported occupational stress was perceived higher among those from the new vs old Federal States, and this was particularly pronounced for those States with their borders in close proximity to the former West Germany. Satisfaction at work was no different for the new and old Federal States, although the evaluation of working climate was deemed more favourable in the newer Federal States. Moreover, the new Federal States were more inclined to adopt low risk-taking and more safety-oriented attitudes than their counterparts in the older Federal States. Conversely, there were no significant differences in accident rate (either at work or whilst driving) between the two categories (new vs old Federal States). Overall, the study shows that subjective experiences of psychological and social processes in the working context remain pronounced 10 years after reunification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress medicine\",\"volume\":\"601 \",\"pages\":\"287-297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<287::AID-SMI875>3.0.CO;2-O\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<287::AID-SMI875>3.0.CO;2-O\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1700(200010)16:5<287::AID-SMI875>3.0.CO;2-O","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在对医疗从业人员及其辅助人员进行的一项大型调查中,观察到来自新(前东德)和旧联邦州(前西德)的个人在工作压力概况方面存在显著差异。来自新联邦州的人比来自旧联邦州的人自我报告的职业压力更高,这在那些与前西德接壤的州尤其明显。新的联邦州和旧的联邦州对工作的满意度没有什么不同,尽管对工作气氛的评价被认为在较新的联邦州更有利。此外,新的联邦国家比旧的联邦国家更倾向于采取低冒险和更注重安全的态度。相反,在两个类别(新旧联邦州)之间,事故率(无论是在工作中还是在驾驶时)没有显著差异。总的来说,研究表明,在统一10年后,工作环境中心理和社会过程的主观体验仍然很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational stress and working climate profiles of medical professionals and auxiliary personnel : ten years after reunification
In a large survey of medical practitioners and their auxiliary personnel, significant differences were observed in the job stress profiles of individuals from the new (former East Germany) and old Federal States (former West Germany). Self-reported occupational stress was perceived higher among those from the new vs old Federal States, and this was particularly pronounced for those States with their borders in close proximity to the former West Germany. Satisfaction at work was no different for the new and old Federal States, although the evaluation of working climate was deemed more favourable in the newer Federal States. Moreover, the new Federal States were more inclined to adopt low risk-taking and more safety-oriented attitudes than their counterparts in the older Federal States. Conversely, there were no significant differences in accident rate (either at work or whilst driving) between the two categories (new vs old Federal States). Overall, the study shows that subjective experiences of psychological and social processes in the working context remain pronounced 10 years after reunification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信