兽医的职业事故和交通事故

R. Trimpop, E. Austin, B. Kirkcaldy
{"title":"兽医的职业事故和交通事故","authors":"R. Trimpop, E. Austin, B. Kirkcaldy","doi":"10.1002/1099-1700(200007)16:4<243::AID-SMI859>3.0.CO;2-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent large-scale survey of accidents in German veterinary surgeons was performed. Veterinary work represents a relatively high-risk occupation involving substantial driving throughout the working week (visiting rural farms, etc.) with high reported rates of driving accidents and of accidents resulting from physical injury through treatment of animals. In this paper the prediction of both driving and other work-related accidents among veterinary surgeons (N=494) is considered; it is appropriate to consider accident rates for this group separately, as there is evidence that the main predictors of accidents differ between veterinary surgeons and auxiliary veterinary personnel. A series of univariate and multivariate analyses of the data indicate that work-related accident occurrence is best predicted by work-related driving distance and risk attitude, with associations also being found with working hours and stress. Driving accident rate is best predicted by risk attitudes, stress and aggression, with associations also being found with age, number of children, work-related driving distance and safety attitude. Construction of transactional models suggests models in which the effect of work-related driving distance on driving accident rates is mediated by risk attitude, whilst the effect of working hours on work-related accidents is mediated by stress. A detailed discussion of the general factors which predict work-related accidents and specific occupational factors which apply to veterinary workers is also included. Problems associated with the high degree of intercorrelation between individual difference and occupational predictors in the interpretation and modelling of accident data are discussed. The implications for practice are also discussed. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":82818,"journal":{"name":"Stress medicine","volume":"194 ","pages":"243-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-1700(200007)16:4<243::AID-SMI859>3.0.CO;2-T","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational and traffic accidents among veterinary surgeons\",\"authors\":\"R. Trimpop, E. Austin, B. Kirkcaldy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1099-1700(200007)16:4<243::AID-SMI859>3.0.CO;2-T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent large-scale survey of accidents in German veterinary surgeons was performed. Veterinary work represents a relatively high-risk occupation involving substantial driving throughout the working week (visiting rural farms, etc.) with high reported rates of driving accidents and of accidents resulting from physical injury through treatment of animals. In this paper the prediction of both driving and other work-related accidents among veterinary surgeons (N=494) is considered; it is appropriate to consider accident rates for this group separately, as there is evidence that the main predictors of accidents differ between veterinary surgeons and auxiliary veterinary personnel. A series of univariate and multivariate analyses of the data indicate that work-related accident occurrence is best predicted by work-related driving distance and risk attitude, with associations also being found with working hours and stress. Driving accident rate is best predicted by risk attitudes, stress and aggression, with associations also being found with age, number of children, work-related driving distance and safety attitude. Construction of transactional models suggests models in which the effect of work-related driving distance on driving accident rates is mediated by risk attitude, whilst the effect of working hours on work-related accidents is mediated by stress. A detailed discussion of the general factors which predict work-related accidents and specific occupational factors which apply to veterinary workers is also included. Problems associated with the high degree of intercorrelation between individual difference and occupational predictors in the interpretation and modelling of accident data are discussed. The implications for practice are also discussed. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress medicine\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"243-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-1700(200007)16:4<243::AID-SMI859>3.0.CO;2-T\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1700(200007)16:4<243::AID-SMI859>3.0.CO;2-T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1700(200007)16:4<243::AID-SMI859>3.0.CO;2-T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

最近对德国兽医事故进行了大规模调查。兽医工作是一项相对高风险的职业,涉及在整个工作周内大量开车(访问农村农场等),据报道,驾驶事故和因治疗动物而造成身体伤害的事故发生率很高。本文考虑了兽医(N=494)驾驶事故和其他工伤事故的预测;单独考虑这一群体的事故率是合适的,因为有证据表明,事故的主要预测因素在兽医和辅助兽医人员之间是不同的。一系列的单变量和多变量数据分析表明,与工作有关的驾驶距离和风险态度最能预测工伤事故的发生,与工作时间和压力也有关联。驾驶事故率最好通过风险态度、压力和攻击性来预测,此外,年龄、孩子数量、与工作有关的驾驶距离和安全态度也与之相关。交易模型的构建表明,工作驾驶距离对驾驶事故率的影响是由风险态度介导的,而工作时间对工作事故的影响是由压力介导的。还详细讨论了预测与工作有关的事故的一般因素和适用于兽医工作者的具体职业因素。在事故数据的解释和建模中,与个体差异和职业预测因子之间高度相互关联的问题进行了讨论。对实践的影响也进行了讨论。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational and traffic accidents among veterinary surgeons
A recent large-scale survey of accidents in German veterinary surgeons was performed. Veterinary work represents a relatively high-risk occupation involving substantial driving throughout the working week (visiting rural farms, etc.) with high reported rates of driving accidents and of accidents resulting from physical injury through treatment of animals. In this paper the prediction of both driving and other work-related accidents among veterinary surgeons (N=494) is considered; it is appropriate to consider accident rates for this group separately, as there is evidence that the main predictors of accidents differ between veterinary surgeons and auxiliary veterinary personnel. A series of univariate and multivariate analyses of the data indicate that work-related accident occurrence is best predicted by work-related driving distance and risk attitude, with associations also being found with working hours and stress. Driving accident rate is best predicted by risk attitudes, stress and aggression, with associations also being found with age, number of children, work-related driving distance and safety attitude. Construction of transactional models suggests models in which the effect of work-related driving distance on driving accident rates is mediated by risk attitude, whilst the effect of working hours on work-related accidents is mediated by stress. A detailed discussion of the general factors which predict work-related accidents and specific occupational factors which apply to veterinary workers is also included. Problems associated with the high degree of intercorrelation between individual difference and occupational predictors in the interpretation and modelling of accident data are discussed. The implications for practice are also discussed. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信