ADHD中DSM - IV亚型的案例

Caryn L. Carlson, Misung Shin, Jane E. Booth
{"title":"ADHD中DSM - IV亚型的案例","authors":"Caryn L. Carlson, Misung Shin, Jane E. Booth","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article selectively reviews research that has examined the three DSM-IV attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes. Data relevant to the validity of the subtyping system, including demographic, comorbidity, cognitive/attentional, and social correlates of the three subtypes are presented. The majority of relevant research has examined the ADHD/C and ADHD/IA subtypes, with less information available for the newly identified ADHD/HI subtype. Findings support the existence of the ADHD/IA subtype; children so diagnosed show impairment and patterns of dysfunction unique from those with the ADHD/C subtype. Further research on many aspects of ADHD/IA is needed to clarify whether it is best considered a separate disorder or an ADHD subtype, however, and to determine the most appropriate diagnostic criteria. Although the scant existing data also suggest that the ADHD/HI subtype is associated with impairment and a different pattern of deficits relative to the other two subtypes, further elucidation of its developmental course is needed to clearly determine its validity. MRDD Research Reviews 1999;5:199–206 © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.","PeriodicalId":74175,"journal":{"name":"Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews","volume":"92 7","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case for DSM‐IV subtypes in ADHD\",\"authors\":\"Caryn L. Carlson, Misung Shin, Jane E. Booth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article selectively reviews research that has examined the three DSM-IV attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes. Data relevant to the validity of the subtyping system, including demographic, comorbidity, cognitive/attentional, and social correlates of the three subtypes are presented. The majority of relevant research has examined the ADHD/C and ADHD/IA subtypes, with less information available for the newly identified ADHD/HI subtype. Findings support the existence of the ADHD/IA subtype; children so diagnosed show impairment and patterns of dysfunction unique from those with the ADHD/C subtype. Further research on many aspects of ADHD/IA is needed to clarify whether it is best considered a separate disorder or an ADHD subtype, however, and to determine the most appropriate diagnostic criteria. Although the scant existing data also suggest that the ADHD/HI subtype is associated with impairment and a different pattern of deficits relative to the other two subtypes, further elucidation of its developmental course is needed to clearly determine its validity. MRDD Research Reviews 1999;5:199–206 © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews\",\"volume\":\"92 7\",\"pages\":\"199-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

摘要

本文选择性地回顾了DSM-IV中三种注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)亚型的研究。数据相关的有效性的亚型系统,包括人口统计,合并症,认知/注意力,和社会相关的三个亚型提出。大多数相关研究已经检查了ADHD/C和ADHD/IA亚型,对于新发现的ADHD/HI亚型的信息较少。研究结果支持ADHD/IA亚型的存在;如此诊断的儿童表现出与ADHD/C亚型不同的损伤和功能障碍模式。然而,需要对ADHD/IA的许多方面进行进一步的研究,以澄清它是最好被视为一种单独的疾病还是ADHD亚型,并确定最合适的诊断标准。尽管现有的少量数据也表明ADHD/HI亚型与其他两种亚型的损害和不同的缺陷模式相关,但需要进一步阐明其发展过程以明确其有效性。MRDD Research Reviews 1999;5:19 99 - 206©1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The case for DSM‐IV subtypes in ADHD
This article selectively reviews research that has examined the three DSM-IV attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes. Data relevant to the validity of the subtyping system, including demographic, comorbidity, cognitive/attentional, and social correlates of the three subtypes are presented. The majority of relevant research has examined the ADHD/C and ADHD/IA subtypes, with less information available for the newly identified ADHD/HI subtype. Findings support the existence of the ADHD/IA subtype; children so diagnosed show impairment and patterns of dysfunction unique from those with the ADHD/C subtype. Further research on many aspects of ADHD/IA is needed to clarify whether it is best considered a separate disorder or an ADHD subtype, however, and to determine the most appropriate diagnostic criteria. Although the scant existing data also suggest that the ADHD/HI subtype is associated with impairment and a different pattern of deficits relative to the other two subtypes, further elucidation of its developmental course is needed to clearly determine its validity. MRDD Research Reviews 1999;5:199–206 © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信