城市地铁系统中的颗粒物浓度和特征——以伊朗德黑兰为例

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mahya Parchami, Majid Shafiepour Motlagh, Alireza Pardakhti
{"title":"城市地铁系统中的颗粒物浓度和特征——以伊朗德黑兰为例","authors":"Mahya Parchami,&nbsp;Majid Shafiepour Motlagh,&nbsp;Alireza Pardakhti","doi":"10.1007/s40201-022-00838-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>The present work aims to evaluate the indoor and outdoor air quality in the stations of the Tehran subway system. In this study, the particulate sampling of the four Tehran subway stations was conducted in March-July 2018 during different seasons to determine indoor and outdoor PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and elemental composition. The samples were analyzed to determine 11 elements such as Pb(Lead), Cd(Cadmium), Ni(Nickel), Co(Cobalt), Mn(Manganese), Zn(Zink), Fe(Iron), Cu(Copper), As(Arsenic), Al(Aluminum) and Cr(Chromium) qualitatively. The experimental results indicated that the average concentrations of both PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> in indoor stations (platforms) were approximately 2–5 times higher than those in the outdoors (ambient air). In addition, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations exceeded the daily-standard values (US-EPA; PM<sub>10</sub> = 50 µg.m<sup>-3</sup>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> = 25 µg.m<sup>-3</sup>) in 100% indoor measurements and 84% outdoor measurements. Moreover, the average indoor PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in weekday values were 1.4 and 1.5 times higher than those measured on weekends, which may be related to the lower frequency of trains. Further, indoor and outdoor correlation of PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations (Pearson r = 0.6) was more than that of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations (Pearson r = 0.2), indicating the additional sources for PM<sub>2.5</sub> in indoor stations. Additionally, the average PM<sub>2.5</sub> / PM<sub>10</sub> ratio was 0.52 for indoor measurements and 0.34 for outdoors, indicating that PM<sub>10</sub> particles were the dominant particle type in both sampling areas and passengers in indoor stations exposed to higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations than those in outdoor stations. Finally, based on elemental analysis, Fe was the most enriched element in indoor and outdoor PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples. The concentration of Fe ranged from 16 to 81 µg.m<sup>-3 </sup>in indoor stations and 0.6 to 2.5 µg.m<sup>-3</sup> in outdoors. Other enriched elements were Al, Cu, Zn, and Mn, respectively.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","volume":"20 2","pages":"953 - 962"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40201-022-00838-7.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Particulate matter concentrations and characterization in urban subway system-case study Tehran, Iran\",\"authors\":\"Mahya Parchami,&nbsp;Majid Shafiepour Motlagh,&nbsp;Alireza Pardakhti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40201-022-00838-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h2>Abstract\\n</h2><div><p>The present work aims to evaluate the indoor and outdoor air quality in the stations of the Tehran subway system. In this study, the particulate sampling of the four Tehran subway stations was conducted in March-July 2018 during different seasons to determine indoor and outdoor PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and elemental composition. The samples were analyzed to determine 11 elements such as Pb(Lead), Cd(Cadmium), Ni(Nickel), Co(Cobalt), Mn(Manganese), Zn(Zink), Fe(Iron), Cu(Copper), As(Arsenic), Al(Aluminum) and Cr(Chromium) qualitatively. The experimental results indicated that the average concentrations of both PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> in indoor stations (platforms) were approximately 2–5 times higher than those in the outdoors (ambient air). In addition, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations exceeded the daily-standard values (US-EPA; PM<sub>10</sub> = 50 µg.m<sup>-3</sup>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> = 25 µg.m<sup>-3</sup>) in 100% indoor measurements and 84% outdoor measurements. Moreover, the average indoor PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in weekday values were 1.4 and 1.5 times higher than those measured on weekends, which may be related to the lower frequency of trains. Further, indoor and outdoor correlation of PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations (Pearson r = 0.6) was more than that of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations (Pearson r = 0.2), indicating the additional sources for PM<sub>2.5</sub> in indoor stations. Additionally, the average PM<sub>2.5</sub> / PM<sub>10</sub> ratio was 0.52 for indoor measurements and 0.34 for outdoors, indicating that PM<sub>10</sub> particles were the dominant particle type in both sampling areas and passengers in indoor stations exposed to higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations than those in outdoor stations. Finally, based on elemental analysis, Fe was the most enriched element in indoor and outdoor PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples. The concentration of Fe ranged from 16 to 81 µg.m<sup>-3 </sup>in indoor stations and 0.6 to 2.5 µg.m<sup>-3</sup> in outdoors. Other enriched elements were Al, Cu, Zn, and Mn, respectively.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"953 - 962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40201-022-00838-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40201-022-00838-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40201-022-00838-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文旨在对德黑兰地铁系统各车站的室内和室外空气质量进行评价。本研究于2018年3月至7月在不同季节对德黑兰四个地铁站进行了颗粒物采样,以确定室内和室外PM10和PM2.5浓度和元素组成。对样品进行了Pb(铅)、Cd(镉)、Ni(镍)、Co(钴)、Mn(锰)、Zn(锌)、Fe(铁)、Cu(铜)、as(砷)、Al(铝)、Cr(铬)等11种元素的定性分析。实验结果表明,室内站(台)PM10和PM2.5的平均浓度约为室外(环境空气)的2-5倍。此外,PM10和PM2.5浓度超过日标准值(US-EPA;PM10 = 50µg。在100%的室内测量和84%的室外测量中,PM2.5 = 25µg - m-3。此外,工作日室内PM10和PM2.5的平均浓度是周末的1.4倍和1.5倍,这可能与火车频率较低有关。PM10浓度的室内外相关性(Pearson r = 0.6)大于PM2.5浓度的室内外相关性(Pearson r = 0.2),说明室内站存在PM2.5的附加源。此外,室内测量的PM2.5 / PM10平均值为0.52,室外测量的PM2.5 / PM10平均值为0.34,表明PM2.5浓度高于室外站点的室内站点的采样区域和乘客中,PM10颗粒都是主要颗粒类型。最后,根据元素分析,Fe是室内和室外PM10和PM2.5样品中富集最多的元素。铁的浓度范围为16 ~ 81µg。M-3在室内站和0.6至2.5µg。室外M-3。其他富集元素分别为Al、Cu、Zn和Mn。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Particulate matter concentrations and characterization in urban subway system-case study Tehran, Iran

Particulate matter concentrations and characterization in urban subway system-case study Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The present work aims to evaluate the indoor and outdoor air quality in the stations of the Tehran subway system. In this study, the particulate sampling of the four Tehran subway stations was conducted in March-July 2018 during different seasons to determine indoor and outdoor PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations and elemental composition. The samples were analyzed to determine 11 elements such as Pb(Lead), Cd(Cadmium), Ni(Nickel), Co(Cobalt), Mn(Manganese), Zn(Zink), Fe(Iron), Cu(Copper), As(Arsenic), Al(Aluminum) and Cr(Chromium) qualitatively. The experimental results indicated that the average concentrations of both PM10 and PM2.5 in indoor stations (platforms) were approximately 2–5 times higher than those in the outdoors (ambient air). In addition, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations exceeded the daily-standard values (US-EPA; PM10 = 50 µg.m-3, PM2.5 = 25 µg.m-3) in 100% indoor measurements and 84% outdoor measurements. Moreover, the average indoor PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in weekday values were 1.4 and 1.5 times higher than those measured on weekends, which may be related to the lower frequency of trains. Further, indoor and outdoor correlation of PM10 concentrations (Pearson r = 0.6) was more than that of PM2.5 concentrations (Pearson r = 0.2), indicating the additional sources for PM2.5 in indoor stations. Additionally, the average PM2.5 / PM10 ratio was 0.52 for indoor measurements and 0.34 for outdoors, indicating that PM10 particles were the dominant particle type in both sampling areas and passengers in indoor stations exposed to higher PM2.5 concentrations than those in outdoor stations. Finally, based on elemental analysis, Fe was the most enriched element in indoor and outdoor PM10 and PM2.5 samples. The concentration of Fe ranged from 16 to 81 µg.m-3 in indoor stations and 0.6 to 2.5 µg.m-3 in outdoors. Other enriched elements were Al, Cu, Zn, and Mn, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering is a peer-reviewed journal presenting timely research on all aspects of environmental health science, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: -Water pollution and treatment -Wastewater treatment and reuse -Air control -Soil remediation -Noise and radiation control -Environmental biotechnology and nanotechnology -Food safety and hygiene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信