在医疗保健和精神疾病患者之间的接触中,患者对远程医疗的看法:一项系统综述

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Sally Wulff Jørgensen , Kim Lee , Søren Harnow Klausen , Esben Nedenskov Petersen , Birgitte Nørgaard
{"title":"在医疗保健和精神疾病患者之间的接触中,患者对远程医疗的看法:一项系统综述","authors":"Sally Wulff Jørgensen ,&nbsp;Kim Lee ,&nbsp;Søren Harnow Klausen ,&nbsp;Esben Nedenskov Petersen ,&nbsp;Birgitte Nørgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to investigate the experiences and opinions of people with mental illness regarding the role of telemedicine in their treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To be eligible, studies were required to include people between 18 and 65 years of age with mental illness, defined as depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or personality disorder. It was further required that the patients’ experiences of the telehealth solutions were reported. Between April 5, 2020, and June 29, 2020 (renewed November 10, 2021), the CINAHL electronic database was searched. Using the OVID search engine, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were likewise searched; gray literature was retrieved from Scopus. The included studies were critically appraised using the CASP checklists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen studies were included. Treatment provided via telehealth technology offered people with mental illness insights and skills that helped them cope better in everyday life. The patient—therapist relationship was improved where the parties collaborated. Furthermore, gaining control of one's mental health by using an app and following one's development empowered people with mental illness, leading to greater involvement in treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Engaging people with mental illness in decisions concerning the use of telehealth technology is essential. It is likewise important that both people with mental illness and health professionals have access to help with the implementation of technology, and that telehealth solutions function as a supplement rather than a substitute for face-to-face treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 44-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients’ perspectives on telemedicine in the encounter between healthcare and patients with mental illness: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Sally Wulff Jørgensen ,&nbsp;Kim Lee ,&nbsp;Søren Harnow Klausen ,&nbsp;Esben Nedenskov Petersen ,&nbsp;Birgitte Nørgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to investigate the experiences and opinions of people with mental illness regarding the role of telemedicine in their treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To be eligible, studies were required to include people between 18 and 65 years of age with mental illness, defined as depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or personality disorder. It was further required that the patients’ experiences of the telehealth solutions were reported. Between April 5, 2020, and June 29, 2020 (renewed November 10, 2021), the CINAHL electronic database was searched. Using the OVID search engine, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were likewise searched; gray literature was retrieved from Scopus. The included studies were critically appraised using the CASP checklists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen studies were included. Treatment provided via telehealth technology offered people with mental illness insights and skills that helped them cope better in everyday life. The patient—therapist relationship was improved where the parties collaborated. Furthermore, gaining control of one's mental health by using an app and following one's development empowered people with mental illness, leading to greater involvement in treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Engaging people with mental illness in decisions concerning the use of telehealth technology is essential. It is likewise important that both people with mental illness and health professionals have access to help with the implementation of technology, and that telehealth solutions function as a supplement rather than a substitute for face-to-face treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 44-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616322000611\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616322000611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景和目的本系统综述旨在调查精神疾病患者对远程医疗在其治疗中的作用的经验和意见。方法为了获得资格,研究需要包括18至65岁的精神疾病患者,定义为抑郁症、焦虑症、双相情感障碍、精神分裂症或人格障碍。还要求报告患者对远程医疗解决方案的体验。在2020年4月5日至2020年6月29日(2021年11月10日更新)期间,搜索了CINAHL电子数据库。使用OVID搜索引擎,同样搜索Embase、MEDLINE和PsycINFO;灰色文献检索自Scopus。纳入的研究使用CASP检查表进行了批判性评估。结果纳入17项研究。通过远程医疗技术提供的治疗为人们提供了心理疾病的见解和技能,帮助他们更好地应对日常生活。双方合作改善了患者与治疗师的关系。此外,通过使用应用程序和跟踪自己的发展来控制自己的心理健康,可以增强精神疾病患者的能力,从而使他们更多地参与治疗。结论让精神疾病患者参与远程医疗技术的使用决策至关重要。同样重要的是,精神病患者和卫生专业人员都能获得技术实施方面的帮助,远程医疗解决方案是面对面治疗的补充而不是替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients’ perspectives on telemedicine in the encounter between healthcare and patients with mental illness: A systematic review

Background and objectives

This systematic review aimed to investigate the experiences and opinions of people with mental illness regarding the role of telemedicine in their treatment.

Methods

To be eligible, studies were required to include people between 18 and 65 years of age with mental illness, defined as depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or personality disorder. It was further required that the patients’ experiences of the telehealth solutions were reported. Between April 5, 2020, and June 29, 2020 (renewed November 10, 2021), the CINAHL electronic database was searched. Using the OVID search engine, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were likewise searched; gray literature was retrieved from Scopus. The included studies were critically appraised using the CASP checklists.

Results

Seventeen studies were included. Treatment provided via telehealth technology offered people with mental illness insights and skills that helped them cope better in everyday life. The patient—therapist relationship was improved where the parties collaborated. Furthermore, gaining control of one's mental health by using an app and following one's development empowered people with mental illness, leading to greater involvement in treatment.

Conclusions

Engaging people with mental illness in decisions concerning the use of telehealth technology is essential. It is likewise important that both people with mental illness and health professionals have access to help with the implementation of technology, and that telehealth solutions function as a supplement rather than a substitute for face-to-face treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信