推拉技术增强了应对气候变化的能力,防止了土地退化:肯尼亚西部采用者的看法

Pierre Celestin Ndayisaba , Shem Kuyah , Charles Aura Odhiambo Midega , Peter Njoroge Mwangi , Zeyaur Rahman Khan
{"title":"推拉技术增强了应对气候变化的能力,防止了土地退化:肯尼亚西部采用者的看法","authors":"Pierre Celestin Ndayisaba ,&nbsp;Shem Kuyah ,&nbsp;Charles Aura Odhiambo Midega ,&nbsp;Peter Njoroge Mwangi ,&nbsp;Zeyaur Rahman Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change and land degradation adversely affect food security in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Smallholder farmers are the most affected. Therefore, it is imperative to identify technologies that boost resilience to climate change, and restore lands. Push-pull technology is among proposed solutions. This technology controls stem borers, fall armyworm, striga, mycotoxins; improves availability of nitrogen and phosphorus, and stores increased carbon in biomass and soils. Though much has been published about push-pull technology, there is a lean in publications about how this technology can help smallholder farmers to cope with climate change and variability. Here, we present perceptions of adopters of push-pull technology in western Kenya with regard to climate change and land degradation, and discuss reasons it should be adopted widely. We compared push-pull and other maize-based cropping systems in western Kenya, through interviews. Push-pull technology produces 0.3–1.1 ​t more maize ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to maize-bean intercrop, and maize monocrop when the season is drier than normal. Additionally, push-pull provides 3.6–9.8 ​t more fodder during drought-stricken seasons. Push-pull technology covers 70% of the soil surface compared to 20% cover found in maize-bean intercrop and maize monocrop. In push-pull farms, 150–280 ​kg nitrogen, 13–24 ​kg phosphorus and 370–470 ​kg potassium can be recycled through biomass and this is five times greater than the potential for maize-bean intercrop and maize monocrop. There is need for wide adoption of push-pull technology to increase resilience of farmers to climate change and restore degraded lands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Push-pull technology enhances resilience to climate change and prevents land degradation: Perceptions of adopters in western Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Celestin Ndayisaba ,&nbsp;Shem Kuyah ,&nbsp;Charles Aura Odhiambo Midega ,&nbsp;Peter Njoroge Mwangi ,&nbsp;Zeyaur Rahman Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Climate change and land degradation adversely affect food security in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Smallholder farmers are the most affected. Therefore, it is imperative to identify technologies that boost resilience to climate change, and restore lands. Push-pull technology is among proposed solutions. This technology controls stem borers, fall armyworm, striga, mycotoxins; improves availability of nitrogen and phosphorus, and stores increased carbon in biomass and soils. Though much has been published about push-pull technology, there is a lean in publications about how this technology can help smallholder farmers to cope with climate change and variability. Here, we present perceptions of adopters of push-pull technology in western Kenya with regard to climate change and land degradation, and discuss reasons it should be adopted widely. We compared push-pull and other maize-based cropping systems in western Kenya, through interviews. Push-pull technology produces 0.3–1.1 ​t more maize ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to maize-bean intercrop, and maize monocrop when the season is drier than normal. Additionally, push-pull provides 3.6–9.8 ​t more fodder during drought-stricken seasons. Push-pull technology covers 70% of the soil surface compared to 20% cover found in maize-bean intercrop and maize monocrop. In push-pull farms, 150–280 ​kg nitrogen, 13–24 ​kg phosphorus and 370–470 ​kg potassium can be recycled through biomass and this is five times greater than the potential for maize-bean intercrop and maize monocrop. There is need for wide adoption of push-pull technology to increase resilience of farmers to climate change and restore degraded lands.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farming System\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farming System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化和土地退化对撒哈拉以南非洲的粮食安全产生不利影响。小农户受到的影响最大。因此,当务之急是确定能够提高应对气候变化能力和恢复土地的技术。推拉技术是提议的解决方案之一。这项技术可以控制蛀虫、秋粘虫、striga和真菌毒素;提高氮和磷的有效性,并将增加的碳储存在生物量和土壤中。尽管已经发表了很多关于推拉技术的文章,但关于这项技术如何帮助小农户应对气候变化和可变性的文章却很少。在这里,我们介绍了肯尼亚西部推拉技术使用者对气候变化和土地退化的看法,并讨论了应该广泛采用推拉技术的原因。我们通过访谈比较了肯尼亚西部的推拉和其他玉米种植制度。推拉技术产生0.3–1.1​与玉米豆间作和玉米单作相比,当季节比正常情况更干燥时,玉米公顷数增加了1。此外,推挽式提供3.6–9.8​在干旱的季节,不要再喂饲料了。推拉技术覆盖了70%的土壤表面,而玉米豆间作和玉米单作覆盖率为20%。在推拉式农场,150–280​kg氮气,13-24​kg磷和370–470​kg的钾可以通过生物质回收,这是玉米豆间作和玉米单作潜力的五倍。需要广泛采用推拉技术,以提高农民对气候变化的抵御能力,恢复退化的土地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Push-pull technology enhances resilience to climate change and prevents land degradation: Perceptions of adopters in western Kenya

Climate change and land degradation adversely affect food security in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Smallholder farmers are the most affected. Therefore, it is imperative to identify technologies that boost resilience to climate change, and restore lands. Push-pull technology is among proposed solutions. This technology controls stem borers, fall armyworm, striga, mycotoxins; improves availability of nitrogen and phosphorus, and stores increased carbon in biomass and soils. Though much has been published about push-pull technology, there is a lean in publications about how this technology can help smallholder farmers to cope with climate change and variability. Here, we present perceptions of adopters of push-pull technology in western Kenya with regard to climate change and land degradation, and discuss reasons it should be adopted widely. We compared push-pull and other maize-based cropping systems in western Kenya, through interviews. Push-pull technology produces 0.3–1.1 ​t more maize ha−1 compared to maize-bean intercrop, and maize monocrop when the season is drier than normal. Additionally, push-pull provides 3.6–9.8 ​t more fodder during drought-stricken seasons. Push-pull technology covers 70% of the soil surface compared to 20% cover found in maize-bean intercrop and maize monocrop. In push-pull farms, 150–280 ​kg nitrogen, 13–24 ​kg phosphorus and 370–470 ​kg potassium can be recycled through biomass and this is five times greater than the potential for maize-bean intercrop and maize monocrop. There is need for wide adoption of push-pull technology to increase resilience of farmers to climate change and restore degraded lands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信