Xiangjin Wang , Beijia Huang , Yao Wang , Junxi Liu , Yuqiong Long , Ichiro Daigo
{"title":"分配方式对碳效益的影响——以建筑垃圾回收利用为例","authors":"Xiangjin Wang , Beijia Huang , Yao Wang , Junxi Liu , Yuqiong Long , Ichiro Daigo","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recycling is crucial to address environmental issues caused by increasing wastes. Recycled materials can replace primary materials and offset greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in a carbon benefit. The environmental burdens and benefits of recycling cause broad discussions about the allocation of the burdens and benefits in life cycle assessment. The recycling situations and recyclability of different materials may be different, therefore, different allocation methods shall be selected. However, a common procedure for selecting the allocation method is missing, which led to difficulty in fairly and reasonably assessing the recycling benefits of wastes from the end-of-life product. In this work, we investigated the impact of carbon emissions in the end-of-life stage with a case of construction wastes. Five allocation methods were selected. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing carbon benefit outcomes. Based on the case studies, we summarized the strengths and limitations of different allocation methods. Finally, a policy-oriented framework for selecting an allocation method was proposed. Our work serves as a basis for allocation method selection and also as a reference for quantifying the carbon benefit of recycled wastes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107269"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of allocation methods on carbon benefits - a case study of construction waste recycling\",\"authors\":\"Xiangjin Wang , Beijia Huang , Yao Wang , Junxi Liu , Yuqiong Long , Ichiro Daigo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recycling is crucial to address environmental issues caused by increasing wastes. Recycled materials can replace primary materials and offset greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in a carbon benefit. The environmental burdens and benefits of recycling cause broad discussions about the allocation of the burdens and benefits in life cycle assessment. The recycling situations and recyclability of different materials may be different, therefore, different allocation methods shall be selected. However, a common procedure for selecting the allocation method is missing, which led to difficulty in fairly and reasonably assessing the recycling benefits of wastes from the end-of-life product. In this work, we investigated the impact of carbon emissions in the end-of-life stage with a case of construction wastes. Five allocation methods were selected. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing carbon benefit outcomes. Based on the case studies, we summarized the strengths and limitations of different allocation methods. Finally, a policy-oriented framework for selecting an allocation method was proposed. Our work serves as a basis for allocation method selection and also as a reference for quantifying the carbon benefit of recycled wastes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of allocation methods on carbon benefits - a case study of construction waste recycling
Recycling is crucial to address environmental issues caused by increasing wastes. Recycled materials can replace primary materials and offset greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in a carbon benefit. The environmental burdens and benefits of recycling cause broad discussions about the allocation of the burdens and benefits in life cycle assessment. The recycling situations and recyclability of different materials may be different, therefore, different allocation methods shall be selected. However, a common procedure for selecting the allocation method is missing, which led to difficulty in fairly and reasonably assessing the recycling benefits of wastes from the end-of-life product. In this work, we investigated the impact of carbon emissions in the end-of-life stage with a case of construction wastes. Five allocation methods were selected. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing carbon benefit outcomes. Based on the case studies, we summarized the strengths and limitations of different allocation methods. Finally, a policy-oriented framework for selecting an allocation method was proposed. Our work serves as a basis for allocation method selection and also as a reference for quantifying the carbon benefit of recycled wastes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.