用新型产能扩张模式凸显区域脱碳挑战

Amanda Farnsworth , Emre Gençer
{"title":"用新型产能扩张模式凸显区域脱碳挑战","authors":"Amanda Farnsworth ,&nbsp;Emre Gençer","doi":"10.1016/j.cles.2023.100078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper highlights the importance of regionally tailored decarbonization strategies to reach emissions intensity targets. The presented Ideal Grid model was used to compare and contrast decarbonization strategies for 9 regions of the continental US. For each of these regions, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) are completed to track emissions intensity and electricity cost based on system installations. Ten technologies are included in this analysis: nuclear, wind, solar, natural gas (3 types), coal (3 types), and energy storage (lithium-ion batteries). The impact of carbon ceilings and carbon taxes are explored. It is shown that a carbon tax can linearly incentivize decarbonization in certain regions and exponentially incentivize decarbonization in other regions. It is shown that wind capacity factors can be used to indicate decarbonization strategies due to a strong correlation that is explored. At deep decarbonization levels (25 gCO<sub>2</sub>/kWh), regions have a varying reliance on nuclear. Regions source anywhere from 27-72% of their electricity from nuclear, with electricity costs ranging from $112/MWh to $137/MWh. At lenient decarbonization targets (100 gCO<sub>2</sub>/kWh), electricity costs range from $93/MWh to $112/MWh.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100252,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Energy Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Highlighting regional decarbonization challenges with novel capacity expansion model\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Farnsworth ,&nbsp;Emre Gençer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cles.2023.100078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper highlights the importance of regionally tailored decarbonization strategies to reach emissions intensity targets. The presented Ideal Grid model was used to compare and contrast decarbonization strategies for 9 regions of the continental US. For each of these regions, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) are completed to track emissions intensity and electricity cost based on system installations. Ten technologies are included in this analysis: nuclear, wind, solar, natural gas (3 types), coal (3 types), and energy storage (lithium-ion batteries). The impact of carbon ceilings and carbon taxes are explored. It is shown that a carbon tax can linearly incentivize decarbonization in certain regions and exponentially incentivize decarbonization in other regions. It is shown that wind capacity factors can be used to indicate decarbonization strategies due to a strong correlation that is explored. At deep decarbonization levels (25 gCO<sub>2</sub>/kWh), regions have a varying reliance on nuclear. Regions source anywhere from 27-72% of their electricity from nuclear, with electricity costs ranging from $112/MWh to $137/MWh. At lenient decarbonization targets (100 gCO<sub>2</sub>/kWh), electricity costs range from $93/MWh to $112/MWh.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Energy Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Energy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772783123000286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772783123000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文强调了区域定制脱碳战略对实现排放强度目标的重要性。所提出的理想电网模型用于比较和对比美国大陆9个地区的脱碳策略。对于每个地区,都完成了技术经济分析(TEA)和生命周期评估(LCA),以跟踪基于系统安装的排放强度和电力成本。本分析包括十项技术:核能、风能、太阳能、天然气(3种)、煤炭(3种类型)和储能(锂离子电池)。探讨了碳上限和碳税的影响。研究表明,碳税可以线性激励某些地区的脱碳,而指数激励其他地区的脱碳。研究表明,由于所探索的相关性很强,风电容量因素可以用来指示脱碳策略。在深度脱碳水平(25 gCO2/kWh)下,各地区对核能的依赖程度各不相同。各地区27-72%的电力来自核能,电力成本从112美元/兆瓦时到137美元/兆瓦小时不等。在宽松的脱碳目标(100 gCO2/kWh)下,电力成本从93美元/MWh到112美元/MWh不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Highlighting regional decarbonization challenges with novel capacity expansion model

Highlighting regional decarbonization challenges with novel capacity expansion model

This paper highlights the importance of regionally tailored decarbonization strategies to reach emissions intensity targets. The presented Ideal Grid model was used to compare and contrast decarbonization strategies for 9 regions of the continental US. For each of these regions, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) are completed to track emissions intensity and electricity cost based on system installations. Ten technologies are included in this analysis: nuclear, wind, solar, natural gas (3 types), coal (3 types), and energy storage (lithium-ion batteries). The impact of carbon ceilings and carbon taxes are explored. It is shown that a carbon tax can linearly incentivize decarbonization in certain regions and exponentially incentivize decarbonization in other regions. It is shown that wind capacity factors can be used to indicate decarbonization strategies due to a strong correlation that is explored. At deep decarbonization levels (25 gCO2/kWh), regions have a varying reliance on nuclear. Regions source anywhere from 27-72% of their electricity from nuclear, with electricity costs ranging from $112/MWh to $137/MWh. At lenient decarbonization targets (100 gCO2/kWh), electricity costs range from $93/MWh to $112/MWh.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信