影响南欧地区磁共振成像使用的因素:一项定性研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Yolanda González-Rábago , Erika Valero , Paola Bully , Pedro Latorre , Begoña Fernandez-Ruanova
{"title":"影响南欧地区磁共振成像使用的因素:一项定性研究","authors":"Yolanda González-Rábago ,&nbsp;Erika Valero ,&nbsp;Paola Bully ,&nbsp;Pedro Latorre ,&nbsp;Begoña Fernandez-Ruanova","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has increased significantly in recent years. Superior diagnostic capability and extension of criteria for the performance of MRI may explain this increase, but there are also non-clinical factors that influence doctors’ decisions. We aim to describe the views of doctors in the Basque Country (Spain) regarding factors affecting MRI orders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with doctors based on intentional sampling to cover a diverse range of interviewees according to personal and professional characteristics (sex, workplace, post of responsibility). We analyzed transcript content using an inductive approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Factors identified by doctors were classified into three themes: 1) superior diagnostic capability of the MRI compared to other imaging modalities has favoured MRI use and inclusion in Clinical Practice Guidelines; 2) patient demands, owing to lower trust and acceptance of doctors’ judgment than to technology-based medicine, leads to patient-doctor relationships that result unnecessary MRI test; 3) structural or contextual aspects of the health system, such as excessive rotation of doctors or a lack of time to carry out a thorough patient examination, which disempower doctors and favour overuse.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Doctors identified non-clinical factors that affect MRI use and that lead to unintended consequences both for the healthcare system and for patients. We recommend an organizational approach to give doctors enough resources to overcome non-clinical factors that lead to excessive MRI orders in order to optimize its use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"12 4","pages":"Article 100816"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting the use of magnetic resonance imaging in a Southern European region: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Yolanda González-Rábago ,&nbsp;Erika Valero ,&nbsp;Paola Bully ,&nbsp;Pedro Latorre ,&nbsp;Begoña Fernandez-Ruanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has increased significantly in recent years. Superior diagnostic capability and extension of criteria for the performance of MRI may explain this increase, but there are also non-clinical factors that influence doctors’ decisions. We aim to describe the views of doctors in the Basque Country (Spain) regarding factors affecting MRI orders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with doctors based on intentional sampling to cover a diverse range of interviewees according to personal and professional characteristics (sex, workplace, post of responsibility). We analyzed transcript content using an inductive approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Factors identified by doctors were classified into three themes: 1) superior diagnostic capability of the MRI compared to other imaging modalities has favoured MRI use and inclusion in Clinical Practice Guidelines; 2) patient demands, owing to lower trust and acceptance of doctors’ judgment than to technology-based medicine, leads to patient-doctor relationships that result unnecessary MRI test; 3) structural or contextual aspects of the health system, such as excessive rotation of doctors or a lack of time to carry out a thorough patient examination, which disempower doctors and favour overuse.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Doctors identified non-clinical factors that affect MRI use and that lead to unintended consequences both for the healthcare system and for patients. We recommend an organizational approach to give doctors enough resources to overcome non-clinical factors that lead to excessive MRI orders in order to optimize its use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的近年来磁共振成像(MRI)的应用显著增加。优越的诊断能力和MRI性能标准的扩展可能解释了这种增加,但也有非临床因素影响医生的决定。我们的目的是描述巴斯克地区(西班牙)医生对影响MRI医嘱的因素的看法。方法我们根据个人和职业特征(性别、工作场所、责任岗位),采用有意抽样的方法,对医生进行了半结构化访谈,以涵盖不同范围的受访者。我们使用归纳法分析了成绩单内容。结果医生确定的因素分为三个主题:1)与其他成像方式相比,MRI的诊断能力优越,有利于MRI的使用和纳入临床实践指南;2) 与基于技术的医学相比,由于对医生判断的信任和接受度较低,患者需求导致了医患关系,导致了不必要的MRI检查;3) 卫生系统的结构或背景方面,如医生过度轮换或缺乏时间对患者进行彻底检查,这剥夺了医生的权力,有利于过度使用。结论医生发现了影响MRI使用的非临床因素,这些因素会对医疗系统和患者造成意想不到的后果。我们建议采用一种组织方法,为医生提供足够的资源,以克服导致MRI订单过多的非临床因素,从而优化其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting the use of magnetic resonance imaging in a Southern European region: a qualitative study

Objectives

The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has increased significantly in recent years. Superior diagnostic capability and extension of criteria for the performance of MRI may explain this increase, but there are also non-clinical factors that influence doctors’ decisions. We aim to describe the views of doctors in the Basque Country (Spain) regarding factors affecting MRI orders.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with doctors based on intentional sampling to cover a diverse range of interviewees according to personal and professional characteristics (sex, workplace, post of responsibility). We analyzed transcript content using an inductive approach.

Results

Factors identified by doctors were classified into three themes: 1) superior diagnostic capability of the MRI compared to other imaging modalities has favoured MRI use and inclusion in Clinical Practice Guidelines; 2) patient demands, owing to lower trust and acceptance of doctors’ judgment than to technology-based medicine, leads to patient-doctor relationships that result unnecessary MRI test; 3) structural or contextual aspects of the health system, such as excessive rotation of doctors or a lack of time to carry out a thorough patient examination, which disempower doctors and favour overuse.

Conclusions

Doctors identified non-clinical factors that affect MRI use and that lead to unintended consequences both for the healthcare system and for patients. We recommend an organizational approach to give doctors enough resources to overcome non-clinical factors that lead to excessive MRI orders in order to optimize its use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信