提高心理健康危机资源的利用率:嵌入社交媒体的单次干预的随机测试

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Katherine Cohen , Mallory Dobias , Robert Morris , Jessica Schleider
{"title":"提高心理健康危机资源的利用率:嵌入社交媒体的单次干预的随机测试","authors":"Katherine Cohen ,&nbsp;Mallory Dobias ,&nbsp;Robert Morris ,&nbsp;Jessica Schleider","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Young people often experience difficulties accessing mental health support. In moments of crisis, many young people search for mental health-related information or support on social media platforms. When users search or post crisis-related content (e.g., “suicide”) on these platforms, many are programmed to automatically provide the user with crisis hotlines. Little research has examined whether young people use crisis hotlines when they are automatically shared, or whether other resource-provision strategies may better support hope and help-seeking.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Users flagged as being potentially in-crisis by social media platforms were referred to Koko—a nonprofit that partners with online platforms to provide crisis support. Users were randomized to receive either a typical crisis response (988 crisis hotline provision) or a one-minute, enhanced crisis response Single-Session Intervention (SSI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Users who received the enhanced crisis response SSI reported greater decreases in hopelessness ten minutes later, compared to users who received the typical crisis response (<em>t</em>(153) = -2.16, <em>p</em> = 0.03, <em>d</em> = -0.35; 95 % CI, −0.67, −0.03). Users who received the SSI were more than twice as likely to report using the resources provided to them, compared to users who received the typical crisis response (78.02 % vs 38.64 %; <em>χ</em>2(1) = 27.02, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>V</em> = 0.28).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An enhanced crisis response SSI embedded within social media platforms can reduce users’ hopelessness and dramatically increase young people’s odds of accessing mental health resources in moments of crisis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 24-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving uptake of mental health crisis resources: Randomized test of a single-session intervention embedded in social media\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Cohen ,&nbsp;Mallory Dobias ,&nbsp;Robert Morris ,&nbsp;Jessica Schleider\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbct.2022.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Young people often experience difficulties accessing mental health support. In moments of crisis, many young people search for mental health-related information or support on social media platforms. When users search or post crisis-related content (e.g., “suicide”) on these platforms, many are programmed to automatically provide the user with crisis hotlines. Little research has examined whether young people use crisis hotlines when they are automatically shared, or whether other resource-provision strategies may better support hope and help-seeking.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Users flagged as being potentially in-crisis by social media platforms were referred to Koko—a nonprofit that partners with online platforms to provide crisis support. Users were randomized to receive either a typical crisis response (988 crisis hotline provision) or a one-minute, enhanced crisis response Single-Session Intervention (SSI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Users who received the enhanced crisis response SSI reported greater decreases in hopelessness ten minutes later, compared to users who received the typical crisis response (<em>t</em>(153) = -2.16, <em>p</em> = 0.03, <em>d</em> = -0.35; 95 % CI, −0.67, −0.03). Users who received the SSI were more than twice as likely to report using the resources provided to them, compared to users who received the typical crisis response (78.02 % vs 38.64 %; <em>χ</em>2(1) = 27.02, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>V</em> = 0.28).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An enhanced crisis response SSI embedded within social media platforms can reduce users’ hopelessness and dramatically increase young people’s odds of accessing mental health resources in moments of crisis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979122000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979122000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

年轻人在获得心理健康支持方面经常遇到困难。在危机时刻,许多年轻人在社交媒体平台上搜索与心理健康相关的信息或支持。当用户在这些平台上搜索或发布与危机相关的内容(例如“自杀”)时,许多平台被编程为自动为用户提供危机热线。很少有研究调查年轻人在自动共享危机热线时是否会使用这些热线,或者其他资源提供策略是否可以更好地支持希望和寻求帮助。方法被社交媒体平台标记为潜在危机的用户被推荐给Koko,这是一家与在线平台合作提供危机支持的非营利组织。用户被随机分配接受典型的危机响应(988危机热线)或一分钟的强化危机响应单会话干预(SSI)。结果与接受典型危机反应的用户相比,接受强化危机反应SSI的用户在10分钟后的绝望感下降幅度更大(t(153)=-2.16,p=0.03,d=-0.35;95%CI,-0.67,-0.03)。与接受典型危机响应的用户相比,接受SSI的用户报告使用提供给他们的资源的可能性是接受典型危机反应的用户的两倍多(78.02%vs 38.64%;χ2(1)=27.02,p<;0.001,V=0.28)。结论在社交媒体平台中嵌入增强的危机应对SSI可以减少用户的绝望情绪,并显著增加年轻人在危机时刻获得心理健康资源的几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving uptake of mental health crisis resources: Randomized test of a single-session intervention embedded in social media

Young people often experience difficulties accessing mental health support. In moments of crisis, many young people search for mental health-related information or support on social media platforms. When users search or post crisis-related content (e.g., “suicide”) on these platforms, many are programmed to automatically provide the user with crisis hotlines. Little research has examined whether young people use crisis hotlines when they are automatically shared, or whether other resource-provision strategies may better support hope and help-seeking.

Methods

Users flagged as being potentially in-crisis by social media platforms were referred to Koko—a nonprofit that partners with online platforms to provide crisis support. Users were randomized to receive either a typical crisis response (988 crisis hotline provision) or a one-minute, enhanced crisis response Single-Session Intervention (SSI).

Results

Users who received the enhanced crisis response SSI reported greater decreases in hopelessness ten minutes later, compared to users who received the typical crisis response (t(153) = -2.16, p = 0.03, d = -0.35; 95 % CI, −0.67, −0.03). Users who received the SSI were more than twice as likely to report using the resources provided to them, compared to users who received the typical crisis response (78.02 % vs 38.64 %; χ2(1) = 27.02, p < 0.001, V = 0.28).

Conclusion

An enhanced crisis response SSI embedded within social media platforms can reduce users’ hopelessness and dramatically increase young people’s odds of accessing mental health resources in moments of crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信