借记卡交换费监管的实证分析——来自巴西的证据

Daniel Tavares de Castro , Emerson Erik Schmitz , Monique de Abreu Azevedo
{"title":"借记卡交换费监管的实证分析——来自巴西的证据","authors":"Daniel Tavares de Castro ,&nbsp;Emerson Erik Schmitz ,&nbsp;Monique de Abreu Azevedo","doi":"10.1016/j.latcb.2022.100078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents an empirical analysis of the introduction, in October 2018, of maximum thresholds (“caps”) on debit card interchange fees for domestic payment cards in Brazil. We investigate the behavior of card issuers’ revenues from debit and credit card interchange fees, the merchant discount rate (MDR) of debit transactions, debit and credit card usage, and debit card scheme fees paid by card issuers and acquirers after the cap. We find a gradual and increasing reduction in the MDR, from 6.0% in 2018Q4 to 22.8% in 2020Q1. Additionally, we observe a statistically significant difference between debit and credit card MDR in 2019Q4 and 2020Q1. The cap reduces card issuers’ earnings from the debit card interchange fee proportionally to the cut but does not affect similar revenues from credit cards. Overall, there is no evidence that the regulation of the debit card interchange fee changes the dynamics of debit card usage or that it changes debit card scheme fees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100867,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical analysis of debit card interchange fee regulation: Evidence from Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Tavares de Castro ,&nbsp;Emerson Erik Schmitz ,&nbsp;Monique de Abreu Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.latcb.2022.100078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents an empirical analysis of the introduction, in October 2018, of maximum thresholds (“caps”) on debit card interchange fees for domestic payment cards in Brazil. We investigate the behavior of card issuers’ revenues from debit and credit card interchange fees, the merchant discount rate (MDR) of debit transactions, debit and credit card usage, and debit card scheme fees paid by card issuers and acquirers after the cap. We find a gradual and increasing reduction in the MDR, from 6.0% in 2018Q4 to 22.8% in 2020Q1. Additionally, we observe a statistically significant difference between debit and credit card MDR in 2019Q4 and 2020Q1. The cap reduces card issuers’ earnings from the debit card interchange fee proportionally to the cut but does not affect similar revenues from credit cards. Overall, there is no evidence that the regulation of the debit card interchange fee changes the dynamics of debit card usage or that it changes debit card scheme fees.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143822000321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143822000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对2018年10月巴西国内支付卡借记卡交换费最高限额(“上限”)的引入进行了实证分析。我们调查了发卡机构的借记卡和信用卡交换费收入、借记交易的商户折扣率(MDR)、借记卡和贷记卡使用情况,以及发卡机构和收单机构在上限后支付的借记卡计划费用的行为。我们发现MDR从2018年第四季度的6.0%逐渐下降到2020年第一季度的22.8%。此外,我们在2019Q4和2020Q1观察到借记卡和信用卡MDR之间存在统计学显著差异。该上限按比例减少了发卡机构从借记卡交换费中获得的收入,但不影响信用卡的类似收入。总体而言,没有证据表明对借记卡交换费的监管改变了借记卡使用的动态,也没有证据表明它改变了借记卡计划费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An empirical analysis of debit card interchange fee regulation: Evidence from Brazil

This paper presents an empirical analysis of the introduction, in October 2018, of maximum thresholds (“caps”) on debit card interchange fees for domestic payment cards in Brazil. We investigate the behavior of card issuers’ revenues from debit and credit card interchange fees, the merchant discount rate (MDR) of debit transactions, debit and credit card usage, and debit card scheme fees paid by card issuers and acquirers after the cap. We find a gradual and increasing reduction in the MDR, from 6.0% in 2018Q4 to 22.8% in 2020Q1. Additionally, we observe a statistically significant difference between debit and credit card MDR in 2019Q4 and 2020Q1. The cap reduces card issuers’ earnings from the debit card interchange fee proportionally to the cut but does not affect similar revenues from credit cards. Overall, there is no evidence that the regulation of the debit card interchange fee changes the dynamics of debit card usage or that it changes debit card scheme fees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信