用于提供二次频率控制服务的储能:哥伦比亚市场的证据

Q1 Social Sciences
Alejandro Gutiérrez Gómez , Ramón Alberto León Candela , John Garcia Rendon
{"title":"用于提供二次频率控制服务的储能:哥伦比亚市场的证据","authors":"Alejandro Gutiérrez Gómez ,&nbsp;Ramón Alberto León Candela ,&nbsp;John Garcia Rendon","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, we evaluate three alternatives for incorporating storage systems in the secondary frequency control service in the Colombian energy market. The first method is to maintain the current auction mechanism linked to the energy offer but including BESS in competition with established generators. The second is to implement mid-term auctions for services providing both generators and Battery Energy Storage Systems, while the third alternative suggests the adoption of long-term auctions with BESS remuneration based on the rate of return methodology. These long-term auctions operate in conjunction with the well-established framework for service provision, utilising generation assets. Based on our results, the latter two alternatives exhibit superior efficiency. Compared to the current scheme, these alternatives have the advantages of: improved efficiency in price forming, minimum impact on the energy market, and decreased service costs. Whereas the annual remuneration under the current mechanism amounts to USD 105 million, alternatives achieve savings from around 7% (only for 50 MW of reserve provision with BESS) to 50% (100% BESS service provision), related to current service costs. This means annual savings of up to USD 62 million. In any of these systems, the operation efficiency is increased, since battery energy storage systems are devices with faster response times to frequency changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy storage for the provision of a secondary frequency control service: Evidence in the Colombian market\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Gutiérrez Gómez ,&nbsp;Ramón Alberto León Candela ,&nbsp;John Garcia Rendon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this article, we evaluate three alternatives for incorporating storage systems in the secondary frequency control service in the Colombian energy market. The first method is to maintain the current auction mechanism linked to the energy offer but including BESS in competition with established generators. The second is to implement mid-term auctions for services providing both generators and Battery Energy Storage Systems, while the third alternative suggests the adoption of long-term auctions with BESS remuneration based on the rate of return methodology. These long-term auctions operate in conjunction with the well-established framework for service provision, utilising generation assets. Based on our results, the latter two alternatives exhibit superior efficiency. Compared to the current scheme, these alternatives have the advantages of: improved efficiency in price forming, minimum impact on the energy market, and decreased service costs. Whereas the annual remuneration under the current mechanism amounts to USD 105 million, alternatives achieve savings from around 7% (only for 50 MW of reserve provision with BESS) to 50% (100% BESS service provision), related to current service costs. This means annual savings of up to USD 62 million. In any of these systems, the operation efficiency is increased, since battery energy storage systems are devices with faster response times to frequency changes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了将存储系统纳入哥伦比亚能源市场二次频率控制服务的三种替代方案。第一种方法是维持与能源报价相关的当前拍卖机制,但包括与现有发电商竞争的BESS。第二种方案是对提供发电机和电池储能系统的服务进行中期拍卖,而第三种方案则建议采用基于回报率方法的BESS薪酬长期拍卖。这些长期拍卖与利用发电资产提供服务的既定框架相结合。根据我们的结果,后两种方案显示出优越的效率。与目前的方案相比,这些替代方案具有以下优点:提高了价格形成的效率,对能源市场的影响最小,并降低了服务成本。尽管目前机制下的年薪酬为1.05亿美元,但替代方案实现了与当前服务成本相关的约7%(仅针对BESS的50MW备用供应)到50%(100%BESS服务供应)的节约。这意味着每年可节省6200万美元。在这些系统中的任何一个中,由于电池能量存储系统是对频率变化具有更快响应时间的设备,因此操作效率提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy storage for the provision of a secondary frequency control service: Evidence in the Colombian market

In this article, we evaluate three alternatives for incorporating storage systems in the secondary frequency control service in the Colombian energy market. The first method is to maintain the current auction mechanism linked to the energy offer but including BESS in competition with established generators. The second is to implement mid-term auctions for services providing both generators and Battery Energy Storage Systems, while the third alternative suggests the adoption of long-term auctions with BESS remuneration based on the rate of return methodology. These long-term auctions operate in conjunction with the well-established framework for service provision, utilising generation assets. Based on our results, the latter two alternatives exhibit superior efficiency. Compared to the current scheme, these alternatives have the advantages of: improved efficiency in price forming, minimum impact on the energy market, and decreased service costs. Whereas the annual remuneration under the current mechanism amounts to USD 105 million, alternatives achieve savings from around 7% (only for 50 MW of reserve provision with BESS) to 50% (100% BESS service provision), related to current service costs. This means annual savings of up to USD 62 million. In any of these systems, the operation efficiency is increased, since battery energy storage systems are devices with faster response times to frequency changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信