{"title":"刮风有关系吗?风力发电对PJM批发电力市场的不同影响","authors":"Bolarinwa A. Ajanaku , Alan R. Collins","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As wind power continues to gain traction as a sustainable energy source, important questions arise as to how and when increasing penetration of wind power undermines its own revenues as well as revenues from other generating technologies in the wholesale electricity market. To answer this question, we analyzed data from the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market (with relatively low, approximately 3% wind penetration) from 2016 to 2019 using quantile regression methods that provide a comprehensive picture of market conditions. Our findings demonstrate that the merit order effect exists for wind power supply expansion with unit revenue declines across all quantiles and generators. These declines occur consistently throughout market conditions but at different magnitudes. Each additional GWh of wind power is associated with a fall in wind revenue ranging from $0.01/MWh to $0.08/MWh. Wind power's cross-cannibalization effect also reduces gas and baseload capacity revenues across all quantiles, ranging from $0.02/MWh to $0.06/MWh per additional GWh of wind power. Interestingly, our results also reveal positive impacts of wind power supply on value factors (a measure of the energy's worth to the market) at low price market conditions, but negative impacts at high price conditions of the 95% and 99% quantiles. These findings confirm differential impacts of wind power across market conditions – more wind increases its worth at low market values but decreases its worth at high market values. Although the observed effects are exceedingly small, the findings of negative and unequal impacts on unit revenue in this research provide some insights and possible policy recommendations for energy market analysts, wind developers, and energy policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does it matter when the wind blows? Differential impacts of wind generation on the PJM wholesale electricity market\",\"authors\":\"Bolarinwa A. Ajanaku , Alan R. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As wind power continues to gain traction as a sustainable energy source, important questions arise as to how and when increasing penetration of wind power undermines its own revenues as well as revenues from other generating technologies in the wholesale electricity market. To answer this question, we analyzed data from the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market (with relatively low, approximately 3% wind penetration) from 2016 to 2019 using quantile regression methods that provide a comprehensive picture of market conditions. Our findings demonstrate that the merit order effect exists for wind power supply expansion with unit revenue declines across all quantiles and generators. These declines occur consistently throughout market conditions but at different magnitudes. Each additional GWh of wind power is associated with a fall in wind revenue ranging from $0.01/MWh to $0.08/MWh. Wind power's cross-cannibalization effect also reduces gas and baseload capacity revenues across all quantiles, ranging from $0.02/MWh to $0.06/MWh per additional GWh of wind power. Interestingly, our results also reveal positive impacts of wind power supply on value factors (a measure of the energy's worth to the market) at low price market conditions, but negative impacts at high price conditions of the 95% and 99% quantiles. These findings confirm differential impacts of wind power across market conditions – more wind increases its worth at low market values but decreases its worth at high market values. Although the observed effects are exceedingly small, the findings of negative and unequal impacts on unit revenue in this research provide some insights and possible policy recommendations for energy market analysts, wind developers, and energy policymakers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does it matter when the wind blows? Differential impacts of wind generation on the PJM wholesale electricity market
As wind power continues to gain traction as a sustainable energy source, important questions arise as to how and when increasing penetration of wind power undermines its own revenues as well as revenues from other generating technologies in the wholesale electricity market. To answer this question, we analyzed data from the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market (with relatively low, approximately 3% wind penetration) from 2016 to 2019 using quantile regression methods that provide a comprehensive picture of market conditions. Our findings demonstrate that the merit order effect exists for wind power supply expansion with unit revenue declines across all quantiles and generators. These declines occur consistently throughout market conditions but at different magnitudes. Each additional GWh of wind power is associated with a fall in wind revenue ranging from $0.01/MWh to $0.08/MWh. Wind power's cross-cannibalization effect also reduces gas and baseload capacity revenues across all quantiles, ranging from $0.02/MWh to $0.06/MWh per additional GWh of wind power. Interestingly, our results also reveal positive impacts of wind power supply on value factors (a measure of the energy's worth to the market) at low price market conditions, but negative impacts at high price conditions of the 95% and 99% quantiles. These findings confirm differential impacts of wind power across market conditions – more wind increases its worth at low market values but decreases its worth at high market values. Although the observed effects are exceedingly small, the findings of negative and unequal impacts on unit revenue in this research provide some insights and possible policy recommendations for energy market analysts, wind developers, and energy policymakers.
Electricity JournalBusiness, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍:
The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.