logit和反向logit模型的最佳、最差、最佳和最差选择概率

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
André de Palma , Karim Kilani
{"title":"logit和反向logit模型的最佳、最差、最佳和最差选择概率","authors":"André de Palma ,&nbsp;Karim Kilani","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper builds upon the work of Professor Marley, who, since the beginning of his long research career, has proposed rigorous axiomatics in the area of probabilistic choice models. Our study concentrates on models that can be applied to best and worst choice scaling experiments. We focus on those among these models that are based on strong assumptions about the underlying ranking of the alternatives with which the individual is assumed to be endowed when making the choice. Taking advantage of an inclusion–exclusion identity that we showed a few years ago, we propose a variety of best–worst choice probability models that could be implemented in software packages that are flourishing in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Choice Modelling","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best, worst, and best&worst choice probabilities for logit and reverse logit models\",\"authors\":\"André de Palma ,&nbsp;Karim Kilani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper builds upon the work of Professor Marley, who, since the beginning of his long research career, has proposed rigorous axiomatics in the area of probabilistic choice models. Our study concentrates on models that can be applied to best and worst choice scaling experiments. We focus on those among these models that are based on strong assumptions about the underlying ranking of the alternatives with which the individual is assumed to be endowed when making the choice. Taking advantage of an inclusion–exclusion identity that we showed a few years ago, we propose a variety of best–worst choice probability models that could be implemented in software packages that are flourishing in this field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Choice Modelling\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Choice Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534523000507\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Choice Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534523000507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文建立在Marley教授的工作基础上,Marley教授自其漫长的研究生涯开始以来,就在概率选择模型领域提出了严格的公理学。我们的研究集中在可以应用于最佳和最差选择缩放实验的模型上。我们关注的是这些模型中那些基于对个人在做出选择时被赋予的备选方案的基本排名的有力假设的模型。利用我们几年前展示的包含-排除身份,我们提出了各种最佳-最差选择概率模型,这些模型可以在该领域蓬勃发展的软件包中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best, worst, and best&worst choice probabilities for logit and reverse logit models

This paper builds upon the work of Professor Marley, who, since the beginning of his long research career, has proposed rigorous axiomatics in the area of probabilistic choice models. Our study concentrates on models that can be applied to best and worst choice scaling experiments. We focus on those among these models that are based on strong assumptions about the underlying ranking of the alternatives with which the individual is assumed to be endowed when making the choice. Taking advantage of an inclusion–exclusion identity that we showed a few years ago, we propose a variety of best–worst choice probability models that could be implemented in software packages that are flourishing in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信