学术恢复力研究中风险因素、保护因素与成绩之间的关系:元分析综述

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nathaniel J. Hunsu , Adurangba V. Oje , Emily E. Tanner-Smith , Olusola Adesope
{"title":"学术恢复力研究中风险因素、保护因素与成绩之间的关系:元分析综述","authors":"Nathaniel J. Hunsu ,&nbsp;Adurangba V. Oje ,&nbsp;Emily E. Tanner-Smith ,&nbsp;Olusola Adesope","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Academic resilience describes the capability to bounce back from adverse circumstances and maintain positive psychological and academic well-being in school. Several prior studies have identified different risk factors that may cause academic setbacks, as well as protective factors that may mitigate the effects of such risk factors and promote academic resilience. Although academic resilience studies have increasingly reported the correlations between these various risk factors, protective factors, and measures of academic achievement, no published review has previously summarized the relative strength of these relationships. This meta-analysis of correlational evidence identified major risk and protective factors reported in the extant academic resilience literature. It also estimated the magnitude and direction of their relationships with academic achievement outcomes. A total of 56 studies and 239 effect sizes were included in the review. The aggregated correlations of relationships between risk, protective factors and achievement outcomes were small but statistically significant. The aggregated correlations of risk and protective factors and academic achievement were <em>r</em> = −0.16 and <em>r</em> = 0.16, respectively. The correlations between achievement and specific family, individual, and societal-related risk factors were significant and higher than the aggregate. Similarly, the correlations of achievement and specific ability, belief, and institutional protective factor variables were statistically significant. Implications of these relationships for future academic resilience studies are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100548"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between risk factors, protective factors and achievement outcomes in academic resilience research: A meta-analytic review\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel J. Hunsu ,&nbsp;Adurangba V. Oje ,&nbsp;Emily E. Tanner-Smith ,&nbsp;Olusola Adesope\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Academic resilience describes the capability to bounce back from adverse circumstances and maintain positive psychological and academic well-being in school. Several prior studies have identified different risk factors that may cause academic setbacks, as well as protective factors that may mitigate the effects of such risk factors and promote academic resilience. Although academic resilience studies have increasingly reported the correlations between these various risk factors, protective factors, and measures of academic achievement, no published review has previously summarized the relative strength of these relationships. This meta-analysis of correlational evidence identified major risk and protective factors reported in the extant academic resilience literature. It also estimated the magnitude and direction of their relationships with academic achievement outcomes. A total of 56 studies and 239 effect sizes were included in the review. The aggregated correlations of relationships between risk, protective factors and achievement outcomes were small but statistically significant. The aggregated correlations of risk and protective factors and academic achievement were <em>r</em> = −0.16 and <em>r</em> = 0.16, respectively. The correlations between achievement and specific family, individual, and societal-related risk factors were significant and higher than the aggregate. Similarly, the correlations of achievement and specific ability, belief, and institutional protective factor variables were statistically significant. Implications of these relationships for future academic resilience studies are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000416\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000416","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学业韧性是指从不利环境中恢复过来,并在学校保持积极的心理和学业健康的能力。先前的几项研究已经确定了可能导致学业挫折的不同风险因素,以及可能减轻这些风险因素影响并提高学业韧性的保护因素。尽管学术韧性研究越来越多地报道了这些各种风险因素、保护因素和学业成绩衡量标准之间的相关性,但此前没有发表的综述总结出这些关系的相对强度。这项相关证据的荟萃分析确定了现存学术韧性文献中报告的主要风险和保护因素。它还估计了它们与学业成绩之间关系的大小和方向。共有56项研究和239个效应大小被纳入该综述。风险、保护因素和成就结果之间的关系的总体相关性很小,但具有统计学意义。风险和保护因素与学业成绩的总相关性分别为r=-0.16和r=0.16。成就与特定的家庭、个人和社会相关风险因素之间的相关性显著且高于总体。同样,成就与特定能力、信念和制度保护因素变量之间的相关性具有统计学意义。讨论了这些关系对未来学术韧性研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships between risk factors, protective factors and achievement outcomes in academic resilience research: A meta-analytic review

Academic resilience describes the capability to bounce back from adverse circumstances and maintain positive psychological and academic well-being in school. Several prior studies have identified different risk factors that may cause academic setbacks, as well as protective factors that may mitigate the effects of such risk factors and promote academic resilience. Although academic resilience studies have increasingly reported the correlations between these various risk factors, protective factors, and measures of academic achievement, no published review has previously summarized the relative strength of these relationships. This meta-analysis of correlational evidence identified major risk and protective factors reported in the extant academic resilience literature. It also estimated the magnitude and direction of their relationships with academic achievement outcomes. A total of 56 studies and 239 effect sizes were included in the review. The aggregated correlations of relationships between risk, protective factors and achievement outcomes were small but statistically significant. The aggregated correlations of risk and protective factors and academic achievement were r = −0.16 and r = 0.16, respectively. The correlations between achievement and specific family, individual, and societal-related risk factors were significant and higher than the aggregate. Similarly, the correlations of achievement and specific ability, belief, and institutional protective factor variables were statistically significant. Implications of these relationships for future academic resilience studies are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信