Raphaela Brambilla Bregagnol DDS, MSc, Maria Paula de Lima Coltro DDS, MSc, PhD, Eduardo Aydos Villarinho DDS, MSc, PhD, Diego Fernandes Triches DDS, MSc, PhD, Fernando Rizzo Alonso DDS, MSc, PhD, Luís André Mendonça Mezzomo DDS, MSc, PhD, Bianca Brandelli de Macedo DDS, Eduardo Rolim Teixeira DDS, PhD, Alvaro Vigo MSc, PhD, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"支持后部单冠的6毫米短种植体的长期临床表现:一项10年队列研究。","authors":"Raphaela Brambilla Bregagnol DDS, MSc, Maria Paula de Lima Coltro DDS, MSc, PhD, Eduardo Aydos Villarinho DDS, MSc, PhD, Diego Fernandes Triches DDS, MSc, PhD, Fernando Rizzo Alonso DDS, MSc, PhD, Luís André Mendonça Mezzomo DDS, MSc, PhD, Bianca Brandelli de Macedo DDS, Eduardo Rolim Teixeira DDS, PhD, Alvaro Vigo MSc, PhD, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/cid.13287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Long-term clinical success of non-splinted, posterior, and short implants still is unclear. This prospective cohort study reports the 10-year follow-up of 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region, and patient-reported outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline sample comprised 20 patients treated with 46 screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants with moderately rough implant surface. Participants were recalled for a 10-year clinical follow-up to assess survival rates, biologic and mechanic conditions, quality of life (OHIP-14), and treatment satisfaction. Data were collected with clinical-radiographic exams and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen patients with 35 implant-crown units were examined after 127.6 ± 11.8 months. For the entire cohort period, 7/46 implants were lost (survival estimate: 77.7% at 133 months), and mechanic complications occurred in 14/46 units (survival estimate: 66.4% at 116 months). In the Cox models, “maximum occlusal force” had a significant effect for implant loss (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and for prosthetic screw loosening (<i>p</i> = 0.038); “arch” and “bruxism” were not significant. Peri-implant bone loss was 0.4 ± 0.6 mm at 10 years. For peri-implant bone level, “crown-to-implant ratio” (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and “time” (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were significant. Bone levels differed from baseline to 12, 48, and 120 months. Satisfaction VAS was 94.0 ± 7.9 mm and OHIP-14 was 2.3 ± 2.2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Single screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants have an acceptable long-term clinical performance, with stable peri-implant bone levels after 10 years of function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"158-169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term clinical performance of short 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region: A 10-year cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Raphaela Brambilla Bregagnol DDS, MSc, Maria Paula de Lima Coltro DDS, MSc, PhD, Eduardo Aydos Villarinho DDS, MSc, PhD, Diego Fernandes Triches DDS, MSc, PhD, Fernando Rizzo Alonso DDS, MSc, PhD, Luís André Mendonça Mezzomo DDS, MSc, PhD, Bianca Brandelli de Macedo DDS, Eduardo Rolim Teixeira DDS, PhD, Alvaro Vigo MSc, PhD, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai DDS, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.13287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Long-term clinical success of non-splinted, posterior, and short implants still is unclear. This prospective cohort study reports the 10-year follow-up of 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region, and patient-reported outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baseline sample comprised 20 patients treated with 46 screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants with moderately rough implant surface. Participants were recalled for a 10-year clinical follow-up to assess survival rates, biologic and mechanic conditions, quality of life (OHIP-14), and treatment satisfaction. Data were collected with clinical-radiographic exams and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fourteen patients with 35 implant-crown units were examined after 127.6 ± 11.8 months. For the entire cohort period, 7/46 implants were lost (survival estimate: 77.7% at 133 months), and mechanic complications occurred in 14/46 units (survival estimate: 66.4% at 116 months). In the Cox models, “maximum occlusal force” had a significant effect for implant loss (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and for prosthetic screw loosening (<i>p</i> = 0.038); “arch” and “bruxism” were not significant. Peri-implant bone loss was 0.4 ± 0.6 mm at 10 years. For peri-implant bone level, “crown-to-implant ratio” (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and “time” (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were significant. Bone levels differed from baseline to 12, 48, and 120 months. Satisfaction VAS was 94.0 ± 7.9 mm and OHIP-14 was 2.3 ± 2.2.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Single screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants have an acceptable long-term clinical performance, with stable peri-implant bone levels after 10 years of function.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"158-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13287\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term clinical performance of short 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region: A 10-year cohort study
Introduction
Long-term clinical success of non-splinted, posterior, and short implants still is unclear. This prospective cohort study reports the 10-year follow-up of 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region, and patient-reported outcomes.
Methods
Baseline sample comprised 20 patients treated with 46 screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants with moderately rough implant surface. Participants were recalled for a 10-year clinical follow-up to assess survival rates, biologic and mechanic conditions, quality of life (OHIP-14), and treatment satisfaction. Data were collected with clinical-radiographic exams and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results
Fourteen patients with 35 implant-crown units were examined after 127.6 ± 11.8 months. For the entire cohort period, 7/46 implants were lost (survival estimate: 77.7% at 133 months), and mechanic complications occurred in 14/46 units (survival estimate: 66.4% at 116 months). In the Cox models, “maximum occlusal force” had a significant effect for implant loss (p = 0.038) and for prosthetic screw loosening (p = 0.038); “arch” and “bruxism” were not significant. Peri-implant bone loss was 0.4 ± 0.6 mm at 10 years. For peri-implant bone level, “crown-to-implant ratio” (p < 0.001) and “time” (p = 0.001) were significant. Bone levels differed from baseline to 12, 48, and 120 months. Satisfaction VAS was 94.0 ± 7.9 mm and OHIP-14 was 2.3 ± 2.2.
Conclusion
Single screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants have an acceptable long-term clinical performance, with stable peri-implant bone levels after 10 years of function.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.