支持后部单冠的6毫米短种植体的长期临床表现:一项10年队列研究。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Raphaela Brambilla Bregagnol DDS, MSc, Maria Paula de Lima Coltro DDS, MSc, PhD, Eduardo Aydos Villarinho DDS, MSc, PhD, Diego Fernandes Triches DDS, MSc, PhD, Fernando Rizzo Alonso DDS, MSc, PhD, Luís André Mendonça Mezzomo DDS, MSc, PhD, Bianca Brandelli de Macedo DDS, Eduardo Rolim Teixeira DDS, PhD, Alvaro Vigo MSc, PhD, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"支持后部单冠的6毫米短种植体的长期临床表现:一项10年队列研究。","authors":"Raphaela Brambilla Bregagnol DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Maria Paula de Lima Coltro DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Eduardo Aydos Villarinho DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Diego Fernandes Triches DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Fernando Rizzo Alonso DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Luís André Mendonça Mezzomo DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Bianca Brandelli de Macedo DDS,&nbsp;Eduardo Rolim Teixeira DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Alvaro Vigo MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/cid.13287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Long-term clinical success of non-splinted, posterior, and short implants still is unclear. This prospective cohort study reports the 10-year follow-up of 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region, and patient-reported outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline sample comprised 20 patients treated with 46 screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants with moderately rough implant surface. Participants were recalled for a 10-year clinical follow-up to assess survival rates, biologic and mechanic conditions, quality of life (OHIP-14), and treatment satisfaction. Data were collected with clinical-radiographic exams and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen patients with 35 implant-crown units were examined after 127.6 ± 11.8 months. For the entire cohort period, 7/46 implants were lost (survival estimate: 77.7% at 133 months), and mechanic complications occurred in 14/46 units (survival estimate: 66.4% at 116 months). In the Cox models, “maximum occlusal force” had a significant effect for implant loss (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and for prosthetic screw loosening (<i>p</i> = 0.038); “arch” and “bruxism” were not significant. Peri-implant bone loss was 0.4 ± 0.6 mm at 10 years. For peri-implant bone level, “crown-to-implant ratio” (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and “time” (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were significant. Bone levels differed from baseline to 12, 48, and 120 months. Satisfaction VAS was 94.0 ± 7.9 mm and OHIP-14 was 2.3 ± 2.2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Single screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants have an acceptable long-term clinical performance, with stable peri-implant bone levels after 10 years of function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"158-169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term clinical performance of short 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region: A 10-year cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Raphaela Brambilla Bregagnol DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Maria Paula de Lima Coltro DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Eduardo Aydos Villarinho DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Diego Fernandes Triches DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Fernando Rizzo Alonso DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Luís André Mendonça Mezzomo DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Bianca Brandelli de Macedo DDS,&nbsp;Eduardo Rolim Teixeira DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Alvaro Vigo MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai DDS, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.13287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Long-term clinical success of non-splinted, posterior, and short implants still is unclear. This prospective cohort study reports the 10-year follow-up of 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region, and patient-reported outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baseline sample comprised 20 patients treated with 46 screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants with moderately rough implant surface. Participants were recalled for a 10-year clinical follow-up to assess survival rates, biologic and mechanic conditions, quality of life (OHIP-14), and treatment satisfaction. Data were collected with clinical-radiographic exams and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fourteen patients with 35 implant-crown units were examined after 127.6 ± 11.8 months. For the entire cohort period, 7/46 implants were lost (survival estimate: 77.7% at 133 months), and mechanic complications occurred in 14/46 units (survival estimate: 66.4% at 116 months). In the Cox models, “maximum occlusal force” had a significant effect for implant loss (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and for prosthetic screw loosening (<i>p</i> = 0.038); “arch” and “bruxism” were not significant. Peri-implant bone loss was 0.4 ± 0.6 mm at 10 years. For peri-implant bone level, “crown-to-implant ratio” (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and “time” (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were significant. Bone levels differed from baseline to 12, 48, and 120 months. Satisfaction VAS was 94.0 ± 7.9 mm and OHIP-14 was 2.3 ± 2.2.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Single screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants have an acceptable long-term clinical performance, with stable peri-implant bone levels after 10 years of function.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"158-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13287\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:非夹板、后部和短植入物的长期临床成功率尚不清楚。这项前瞻性队列研究报告了支持后部单冠的6mm植入物的10年随访,以及患者报告的结果。方法:基线样本包括20名接受46个螺钉固定牙冠治疗的患者,该牙冠由种植体表面中度粗糙的6mm种植体支撑。参与者被召回进行为期10年的临床随访,以评估生存率、生物和机械条件、生活质量(OHIP-14)和治疗满意度。通过临床放射学检查收集数据,并使用描述性和推断统计学进行分析。结果:14名患者在127.6 ±11.8 月。在整个队列期间,7/46个植入物丢失(生存率估计:77.7%,133 月),机械并发症发生在14/46 单位(生存率估计:在116时为66.4% 月)。在Cox模型中,“最大咬合力”对种植体损失有显著影响(p = 0.038)和假体螺钉松动(p = 0.038);“足弓”和“磨牙症”不显著。种植体周围骨丢失0.4 ±0.6 10时为mm 年。对于种植体周围的骨水平,“牙冠与种植体的比例”(p 结论:由6mm种植体支撑的单螺钉保留牙冠具有可接受的长期临床性能,10年后种植体周围的骨水平稳定 多年的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term clinical performance of short 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region: A 10-year cohort study

Introduction

Long-term clinical success of non-splinted, posterior, and short implants still is unclear. This prospective cohort study reports the 10-year follow-up of 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region, and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods

Baseline sample comprised 20 patients treated with 46 screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants with moderately rough implant surface. Participants were recalled for a 10-year clinical follow-up to assess survival rates, biologic and mechanic conditions, quality of life (OHIP-14), and treatment satisfaction. Data were collected with clinical-radiographic exams and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

Fourteen patients with 35 implant-crown units were examined after 127.6 ± 11.8 months. For the entire cohort period, 7/46 implants were lost (survival estimate: 77.7% at 133 months), and mechanic complications occurred in 14/46 units (survival estimate: 66.4% at 116 months). In the Cox models, “maximum occlusal force” had a significant effect for implant loss (p = 0.038) and for prosthetic screw loosening (p = 0.038); “arch” and “bruxism” were not significant. Peri-implant bone loss was 0.4 ± 0.6 mm at 10 years. For peri-implant bone level, “crown-to-implant ratio” (p < 0.001) and “time” (p = 0.001) were significant. Bone levels differed from baseline to 12, 48, and 120 months. Satisfaction VAS was 94.0 ± 7.9 mm and OHIP-14 was 2.3 ± 2.2.

Conclusion

Single screw-retained crowns supported by 6-mm implants have an acceptable long-term clinical performance, with stable peri-implant bone levels after 10 years of function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信