噬菌体疗法作为抗生素耐药性感染的替代治疗方法的潜力。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medical Principles and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1159/000534717
Nike Walter, Mohammadali Mirzaei, Li Deng, Christian Willy, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp
{"title":"噬菌体疗法作为抗生素耐药性感染的替代治疗方法的潜力。","authors":"Nike Walter, Mohammadali Mirzaei, Li Deng, Christian Willy, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp","doi":"10.1159/000534717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the literature on the therapeutical application of bacteriophages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, a bibliometric analysis was performed using the database Web of Science to determine annual number of publications and citations. Second, a systematic literature review was conducted on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of phage therapy in PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past decade, the number of publications on bacteriophage therapy increased more than fourfold with 212 articles in 2011 and 739 in 2022. The systematic search in PubMed yielded 7 RCTs eligible for inclusion, reporting on a total of 418 participants. Identified indications in this study included bacterial diarrhea, urinary tract infections, infected burn wounds, chronic otitis, chronic venous leg ulcers, and chronic rhinosinusitis. In three studies, mild to moderate adverse events were reported in 10/195 participants (5.1%). Three of the studies reported a statistically significant difference in outcomes comparing phage therapy with standard of care or placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phage therapy has gained increasing interest over the years. RCTs on different indications suggest the safety of phage therapy; however, reasons why phage therapy is not yet well accepted are limitations in the study designs. For a successful translation into clinical practice researchers and clinicians should learn from the earlier experiences and consider issues such as the quality of phage preparation, sensitivity testing, titer and dosages, as well as access to the infection site and stability for standardized protocols and future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Potential of Bacteriophage Therapy as an Alternative Treatment Approach for Antibiotic-Resistant Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Nike Walter, Mohammadali Mirzaei, Li Deng, Christian Willy, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the literature on the therapeutical application of bacteriophages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, a bibliometric analysis was performed using the database Web of Science to determine annual number of publications and citations. Second, a systematic literature review was conducted on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of phage therapy in PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past decade, the number of publications on bacteriophage therapy increased more than fourfold with 212 articles in 2011 and 739 in 2022. The systematic search in PubMed yielded 7 RCTs eligible for inclusion, reporting on a total of 418 participants. Identified indications in this study included bacterial diarrhea, urinary tract infections, infected burn wounds, chronic otitis, chronic venous leg ulcers, and chronic rhinosinusitis. In three studies, mild to moderate adverse events were reported in 10/195 participants (5.1%). Three of the studies reported a statistically significant difference in outcomes comparing phage therapy with standard of care or placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phage therapy has gained increasing interest over the years. RCTs on different indications suggest the safety of phage therapy; however, reasons why phage therapy is not yet well accepted are limitations in the study designs. For a successful translation into clinical practice researchers and clinicians should learn from the earlier experiences and consider issues such as the quality of phage preparation, sensitivity testing, titer and dosages, as well as access to the infection site and stability for standardized protocols and future trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在全面综述噬菌体治疗应用的文献现状。方法:首先,使用数据库Web of Science进行文献计量分析,以确定每年的出版物数量和引用次数。其次,对PubMed中噬菌体治疗的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统的文献综述。结果:在过去十年中,噬菌体治疗的出版物数量增加了四倍多,2011年增加了212篇,2022年增加了739篇。PubMed中的系统搜索产生了7项符合入选条件的随机对照试验,共有418名参与者。本研究中确定的适应症包括细菌性腹泻、尿路感染、感染性烧伤、慢性中耳炎、慢性静脉性腿部溃疡和慢性鼻窦炎。在三项研究中,有10/195名参与者(5.1%)报告了轻度至中度不良事件。其中三项研究报告称,与标准护理或安慰剂相比,噬菌体治疗的结果存在统计学显著差异。结论:近年来噬菌体治疗越来越受到人们的关注。不同适应症的随机对照试验表明噬菌体疗法是安全的,然而噬菌体疗法尚未被广泛接受的原因是研究设计的局限性。为了成功转化为临床实践,研究人员和临床医生应该学习早期的经验,并考虑噬菌体制备的质量、灵敏度测试、滴度和剂量,以及进入感染部位的途径和标准化方案和未来试验的稳定性等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Potential of Bacteriophage Therapy as an Alternative Treatment Approach for Antibiotic-Resistant Infections.

Objective: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the literature on the therapeutical application of bacteriophages.

Methods: First, a bibliometric analysis was performed using the database Web of Science to determine annual number of publications and citations. Second, a systematic literature review was conducted on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of phage therapy in PubMed.

Results: Over the past decade, the number of publications on bacteriophage therapy increased more than fourfold with 212 articles in 2011 and 739 in 2022. The systematic search in PubMed yielded 7 RCTs eligible for inclusion, reporting on a total of 418 participants. Identified indications in this study included bacterial diarrhea, urinary tract infections, infected burn wounds, chronic otitis, chronic venous leg ulcers, and chronic rhinosinusitis. In three studies, mild to moderate adverse events were reported in 10/195 participants (5.1%). Three of the studies reported a statistically significant difference in outcomes comparing phage therapy with standard of care or placebo.

Conclusion: Phage therapy has gained increasing interest over the years. RCTs on different indications suggest the safety of phage therapy; however, reasons why phage therapy is not yet well accepted are limitations in the study designs. For a successful translation into clinical practice researchers and clinicians should learn from the earlier experiences and consider issues such as the quality of phage preparation, sensitivity testing, titer and dosages, as well as access to the infection site and stability for standardized protocols and future trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信