摄影Frankfort平面下角(FSA)角度评估错牙合受试者前后差异:一项前瞻性研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2023-09-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_7_23
R Rebekah, Ravindra Kumar Jain, Arthi Balasubramaniam, Swapna Sreenivasagan
{"title":"摄影Frankfort平面下角(FSA)角度评估错牙合受试者前后差异:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"R Rebekah,&nbsp;Ravindra Kumar Jain,&nbsp;Arthi Balasubramaniam,&nbsp;Swapna Sreenivasagan","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_7_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior-posterior discrepancy assessment is a crucial component of orthodontic diagnosis and is often carried out using hard tissue cephalometric analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle with established cephalometric parameters to determine the accuracy of the angle in determining maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, a total of 60 subjects, 20 in each skeletal sagittal malocclusion, were included in the final sample based on the selection criteria. Both photographic and cephalometric records were taken, and the parameters assessed were the beta angle, Steiner's analysis, the ANB (A point- Nasion- B point) angle in the cephalograms, and the FSA angle in the profile photographs. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software. The correlation between the measured parameters was assessed using Pearson's correlation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A high positive and significant correlation between the FSA angle and beta angle (r = 0.793) was noted, and a high negative and significant correlation between the FSA angle and ANB angle (r = -0.848) was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The photographic FSA angle can be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose anteroposterior discrepancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/d8/JOS-12-57.PMC10597371.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"R Rebekah,&nbsp;Ravindra Kumar Jain,&nbsp;Arthi Balasubramaniam,&nbsp;Swapna Sreenivasagan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_7_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior-posterior discrepancy assessment is a crucial component of orthodontic diagnosis and is often carried out using hard tissue cephalometric analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle with established cephalometric parameters to determine the accuracy of the angle in determining maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, a total of 60 subjects, 20 in each skeletal sagittal malocclusion, were included in the final sample based on the selection criteria. Both photographic and cephalometric records were taken, and the parameters assessed were the beta angle, Steiner's analysis, the ANB (A point- Nasion- B point) angle in the cephalograms, and the FSA angle in the profile photographs. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software. The correlation between the measured parameters was assessed using Pearson's correlation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A high positive and significant correlation between the FSA angle and beta angle (r = 0.793) was noted, and a high negative and significant correlation between the FSA angle and ANB angle (r = -0.848) was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The photographic FSA angle can be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose anteroposterior discrepancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/d8/JOS-12-57.PMC10597371.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_7_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_7_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:前后差异评估是正畸诊断的重要组成部分,通常使用硬组织头影测量分析进行。本研究的目的是将拍摄的法兰克福平面下角(FSA)角度与已建立的头影测量参数进行比较,以确定该角度在确定上下颌前后差异方面的准确性。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,根据选择标准,共有60名受试者被纳入最终样本,每个骨骼矢状面错牙合20名。拍摄了照片和头影测量记录,评估的参数为β角、Steiner分析、头影图中的ANB(A点-Nasion-B点)角和侧面照片中的FSA角。采用SPSS软件进行统计分析。测量参数之间的相关性使用Pearson相关检验进行评估。结果:FSA角与β角呈高度正相关(r=0.793),FSA角与ANB角呈高度负相关(r=-0.484)。结论:摄影FSA角度可作为诊断前后差异的可靠参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study.

Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study.

Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study.

Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study.

Introduction: Anterior-posterior discrepancy assessment is a crucial component of orthodontic diagnosis and is often carried out using hard tissue cephalometric analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle with established cephalometric parameters to determine the accuracy of the angle in determining maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, a total of 60 subjects, 20 in each skeletal sagittal malocclusion, were included in the final sample based on the selection criteria. Both photographic and cephalometric records were taken, and the parameters assessed were the beta angle, Steiner's analysis, the ANB (A point- Nasion- B point) angle in the cephalograms, and the FSA angle in the profile photographs. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software. The correlation between the measured parameters was assessed using Pearson's correlation test.

Results: A high positive and significant correlation between the FSA angle and beta angle (r = 0.793) was noted, and a high negative and significant correlation between the FSA angle and ANB angle (r = -0.848) was noted.

Conclusion: The photographic FSA angle can be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose anteroposterior discrepancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信