一项前瞻性研究:磷霉素作为抗生素预防经直肠前列腺活检的疗效及对活检后下尿路症状的影响。

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Andreia Cardoso, Jorge Ribeiro, Rafael Araújo, João Pimentel Torres, Paulo Mota
{"title":"一项前瞻性研究:磷霉素作为抗生素预防经直肠前列腺活检的疗效及对活检后下尿路症状的影响。","authors":"Andreia Cardoso,&nbsp;Jorge Ribeiro,&nbsp;Rafael Araújo,&nbsp;João Pimentel Torres,&nbsp;Paulo Mota","doi":"10.5152/tud.2023.23030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Due to fluoroquinolone resistances worldwide, valid alternatives for anti- biotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are needed, thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prophylactic fosfomycin versus other oral prolonged antibiotic regimens, in preventing complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients submitted to transrectal ultrasound- guided prostate biopsy were divided into 2 groups according to the prophylactic antibiotic scheme performed: \"short\" (2 fosfomycin doses) versus \"long\" (antibiotic ≥ 8 days). One week and 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, we assessed complications' occurrence (lower urinary tract symptoms, fever, sepsis, hemorrhage) and adverse drug reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 244 patients (fosfomycin n=178, \"long\" antibiotic n=66). The only significant difference between groups was higher lower urinary tract symptom incidence 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in fosfomy- cin patients (16.85% vs. 6.06%, P=.031). However, after 1 week, lower urinary tract symptoms were tendentially frequenter on \"long\" antibiotic group (31.81% vs. 25.84%, P = .059). Infectious and hemorrhagic complications rate, adverse drug reactions, and recurrence to health services were similar between groups, and significantly decreased between the first week and first month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis seems to impact lower urinary tract symptoms after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Fosfomycin may provide slightly better outcome on the immediate period, while \"long\" antibiotic courses lead to significantly less lower urinary tract symptoms 1 month post-transrectal ultrasound-guided pros- tate biopsy, perhaps by preventing incipient prostatitis phenomena. Future directed studies should clarify these findings. Still, it seems feasible to ally fosfomycin advan- tages with noninferior safety, efficacy, and tolerability, allowing to reserve \"long\" regimens to other contexts. This is especially relevant in centers where transperineal biopsies are still not possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"49 4","pages":"259-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Fosfomycin as Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and Impact on Lower Urinary Tract Symptom After Biopsy: A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andreia Cardoso,&nbsp;Jorge Ribeiro,&nbsp;Rafael Araújo,&nbsp;João Pimentel Torres,&nbsp;Paulo Mota\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tud.2023.23030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Due to fluoroquinolone resistances worldwide, valid alternatives for anti- biotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are needed, thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prophylactic fosfomycin versus other oral prolonged antibiotic regimens, in preventing complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients submitted to transrectal ultrasound- guided prostate biopsy were divided into 2 groups according to the prophylactic antibiotic scheme performed: \\\"short\\\" (2 fosfomycin doses) versus \\\"long\\\" (antibiotic ≥ 8 days). One week and 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, we assessed complications' occurrence (lower urinary tract symptoms, fever, sepsis, hemorrhage) and adverse drug reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 244 patients (fosfomycin n=178, \\\"long\\\" antibiotic n=66). The only significant difference between groups was higher lower urinary tract symptom incidence 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in fosfomy- cin patients (16.85% vs. 6.06%, P=.031). However, after 1 week, lower urinary tract symptoms were tendentially frequenter on \\\"long\\\" antibiotic group (31.81% vs. 25.84%, P = .059). Infectious and hemorrhagic complications rate, adverse drug reactions, and recurrence to health services were similar between groups, and significantly decreased between the first week and first month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis seems to impact lower urinary tract symptoms after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Fosfomycin may provide slightly better outcome on the immediate period, while \\\"long\\\" antibiotic courses lead to significantly less lower urinary tract symptoms 1 month post-transrectal ultrasound-guided pros- tate biopsy, perhaps by preventing incipient prostatitis phenomena. Future directed studies should clarify these findings. Still, it seems feasible to ally fosfomycin advan- tages with noninferior safety, efficacy, and tolerability, allowing to reserve \\\"long\\\" regimens to other contexts. This is especially relevant in centers where transperineal biopsies are still not possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"259-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544358/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于全世界对氟喹诺酮类药物的耐药性,需要有效的抗生素预防方案来进行经直肠超声引导前列腺活检,因此,我们旨在评估预防性磷霉素与其他口服延长抗生素方案在预防经直肠超声导导导前列腺活检后并发症方面的有效性、安全性和耐受性。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,接受经直肠超声引导前列腺活检的患者根据预防性抗生素方案分为2组:“短”(2剂磷霉素)和“长”(抗生素≥8天)。经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后一周零一个月,我们评估了并发症的发生情况(下尿路症状、发烧、败血症、出血)和药物不良反应。结果:我们纳入244例患者(磷霉素n=178,“长”抗生素n=66)。两组之间唯一的显著差异是磷霉素患者经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后1个月的下尿路症状发生率较高(16.85%对6.06%,P=.031)。然而,1周后,“长”抗生素组的下尿路症状更频繁(31.81%对25.84%,P=0.59)。感染和出血并发症发生率,两组之间的药物不良反应和复发情况相似,并且在第一周和第一个月之间显著下降。结论:抗生素预防似乎会影响经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后的下尿路症状。磷霉素可能在短期内提供稍好的结果,而“长期”抗生素疗程可能通过预防早期前列腺炎现象,在经直肠超声引导的前列腺活检后1个月,显著减少下尿路症状。未来的研究应该澄清这些发现。尽管如此,联合磷霉素似乎是可行的,具有非劣效性、安全性和耐受性,允许将“长期”方案保留到其他情况下。这在仍然无法进行经会阴活检的中心尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Efficacy of Fosfomycin as Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and Impact on Lower Urinary Tract Symptom After Biopsy: A Prospective Study.

The Efficacy of Fosfomycin as Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and Impact on Lower Urinary Tract Symptom After Biopsy: A Prospective Study.

Objective: Due to fluoroquinolone resistances worldwide, valid alternatives for anti- biotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are needed, thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prophylactic fosfomycin versus other oral prolonged antibiotic regimens, in preventing complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Methods: In this prospective study, patients submitted to transrectal ultrasound- guided prostate biopsy were divided into 2 groups according to the prophylactic antibiotic scheme performed: "short" (2 fosfomycin doses) versus "long" (antibiotic ≥ 8 days). One week and 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, we assessed complications' occurrence (lower urinary tract symptoms, fever, sepsis, hemorrhage) and adverse drug reactions.

Results: We included 244 patients (fosfomycin n=178, "long" antibiotic n=66). The only significant difference between groups was higher lower urinary tract symptom incidence 1 month after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in fosfomy- cin patients (16.85% vs. 6.06%, P=.031). However, after 1 week, lower urinary tract symptoms were tendentially frequenter on "long" antibiotic group (31.81% vs. 25.84%, P = .059). Infectious and hemorrhagic complications rate, adverse drug reactions, and recurrence to health services were similar between groups, and significantly decreased between the first week and first month.

Conclusion: Antibiotic prophylaxis seems to impact lower urinary tract symptoms after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Fosfomycin may provide slightly better outcome on the immediate period, while "long" antibiotic courses lead to significantly less lower urinary tract symptoms 1 month post-transrectal ultrasound-guided pros- tate biopsy, perhaps by preventing incipient prostatitis phenomena. Future directed studies should clarify these findings. Still, it seems feasible to ally fosfomycin advan- tages with noninferior safety, efficacy, and tolerability, allowing to reserve "long" regimens to other contexts. This is especially relevant in centers where transperineal biopsies are still not possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信