下牙槽加颊神经阻滞可降低颊粘膜移植术后疼痛评分:回顾性分析。

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Vivek Tarigopula, Swarnendu Mandal, Gorrepati Rohith, Abhay S Gaur, Manoj K Das
{"title":"下牙槽加颊神经阻滞可降低颊粘膜移植术后疼痛评分:回顾性分析。","authors":"Vivek Tarigopula, Swarnendu Mandal, Gorrepati Rohith, Abhay S Gaur, Manoj K Das","doi":"10.5152/tud.2023.23080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative pain at buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site hinders the resumption of food intake. We aim to study the effect of inferior-alveolar nerve block plus buccal nerve block (IANB+BNB) on pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case-control study performed in a single center from July 2021 to July 2022 (ethics committee approval: T/IM-NF/Urology/23/27). We performed IANB+BNB with a mixture of 5 mL each of 1% lignocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone, in addition to local infiltration of 2% lignocaine and (1:100000) epinephrine combination before harvesting BMG. We retrospectively compared the recorded postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) among patients who received and did not receive IANB+BNB. The time for resumption of pain-free diets and postoperative analgesic requirements was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups included 20 patients each and were similar in age and graft size. The VAS scores at 0 hours [1.0 (1.25) vs. 2.5 (3.5); P= .043], 6 hours [2.40 (± 0.69) vs. 4.60 (± 0.97); P= .008], 12 hours [2.50 (± 0.97) vs. 4.80 (± 0.92); P= .008], and 24 hours [3.0 (1.25) vs. 4.5 (1.25); P= .002] were better in the intervention arm. However, the pain beyond the second day was similar. The IANB+BNB group resumed solid food quicker, and the cumulative paracetamol dose required was less [8.9 (± 3.03) vs. 16.2 (± 5.06) g; P= .001]. Fewer patients required opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received IANB+BNB had better pain scores during the first 24 hours following surgery and tolerated solid diet quicker.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"49 5","pages":"329-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inferior Alveolar Plus Buccal Nerve Block Decreases Postoperative Pain Scores at Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site: A Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Tarigopula, Swarnendu Mandal, Gorrepati Rohith, Abhay S Gaur, Manoj K Das\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tud.2023.23080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative pain at buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site hinders the resumption of food intake. We aim to study the effect of inferior-alveolar nerve block plus buccal nerve block (IANB+BNB) on pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case-control study performed in a single center from July 2021 to July 2022 (ethics committee approval: T/IM-NF/Urology/23/27). We performed IANB+BNB with a mixture of 5 mL each of 1% lignocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone, in addition to local infiltration of 2% lignocaine and (1:100000) epinephrine combination before harvesting BMG. We retrospectively compared the recorded postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) among patients who received and did not receive IANB+BNB. The time for resumption of pain-free diets and postoperative analgesic requirements was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups included 20 patients each and were similar in age and graft size. The VAS scores at 0 hours [1.0 (1.25) vs. 2.5 (3.5); P= .043], 6 hours [2.40 (± 0.69) vs. 4.60 (± 0.97); P= .008], 12 hours [2.50 (± 0.97) vs. 4.80 (± 0.92); P= .008], and 24 hours [3.0 (1.25) vs. 4.5 (1.25); P= .002] were better in the intervention arm. However, the pain beyond the second day was similar. The IANB+BNB group resumed solid food quicker, and the cumulative paracetamol dose required was less [8.9 (± 3.03) vs. 16.2 (± 5.06) g; P= .001]. Fewer patients required opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received IANB+BNB had better pain scores during the first 24 hours following surgery and tolerated solid diet quicker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"329-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颊粘膜移植物(BMG)收获部位的术后疼痛阻碍了食物摄入的恢复。我们的目的是研究下牙槽神经阻滞加颊神经阻滞(IANB+BNB)对疼痛评分的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,于2021年7月至2022年7月在一个中心进行(伦理委员会批准:T/IM-NF/Urology/23/27)。在收获BMG之前,我们使用1%利多卡因、0.25%布比卡因和4mg地塞米松各5mL的混合物进行IANB+BNB,以及2%利多卡因和(1:100000)肾上腺素组合的局部渗透。我们使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对接受和未接受IANB+BNB的患者的术后疼痛评分进行了回顾性比较。比较恢复无疼痛饮食的时间和术后镇痛需求。结果:研究组各包括20名患者,年龄和移植物大小相似。在干预组中,0小时[1.0(1.25)vs.2.5(3.5);P=.043]、6小时[2.40(±0.69)vs.4.60(±0.97);P=.008]、12小时[2.50(±0.97%)vs.4.80(±092);P=0.008]和24小时[3.0(1.25vs.4.5(1.25);P=0.002]的VAS评分更好。然而,第二天之后的疼痛情况类似。IANB+BNB组恢复固体食物的速度更快,所需的扑热息痛累积剂量更少[8.9(±3.03)vs.16.2(±5.06)g;P=0.001]。需要阿片类药物的患者更少。结论:接受IANB+BNB的患者在手术后的前24小时内疼痛评分更好,对固体饮食的耐受性更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inferior Alveolar Plus Buccal Nerve Block Decreases Postoperative Pain Scores at Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site: A Retrospective Analysis.

Objective: Postoperative pain at buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site hinders the resumption of food intake. We aim to study the effect of inferior-alveolar nerve block plus buccal nerve block (IANB+BNB) on pain scores.

Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study performed in a single center from July 2021 to July 2022 (ethics committee approval: T/IM-NF/Urology/23/27). We performed IANB+BNB with a mixture of 5 mL each of 1% lignocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone, in addition to local infiltration of 2% lignocaine and (1:100000) epinephrine combination before harvesting BMG. We retrospectively compared the recorded postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) among patients who received and did not receive IANB+BNB. The time for resumption of pain-free diets and postoperative analgesic requirements was compared.

Results: The study groups included 20 patients each and were similar in age and graft size. The VAS scores at 0 hours [1.0 (1.25) vs. 2.5 (3.5); P= .043], 6 hours [2.40 (± 0.69) vs. 4.60 (± 0.97); P= .008], 12 hours [2.50 (± 0.97) vs. 4.80 (± 0.92); P= .008], and 24 hours [3.0 (1.25) vs. 4.5 (1.25); P= .002] were better in the intervention arm. However, the pain beyond the second day was similar. The IANB+BNB group resumed solid food quicker, and the cumulative paracetamol dose required was less [8.9 (± 3.03) vs. 16.2 (± 5.06) g; P= .001]. Fewer patients required opioids.

Conclusion: Patients who received IANB+BNB had better pain scores during the first 24 hours following surgery and tolerated solid diet quicker.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信