挪威职业治疗师的研究参与和优先事项调查。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Tina Taule, Inger Hellem, Irmelin Smith Eide, Kristin Gjelvik, Liv Elisabeth Hinderaker, Ingvild Kjeken, Bianca Rolfsnes-Flock, Merethe Hustoft
{"title":"挪威职业治疗师的研究参与和优先事项调查。","authors":"Tina Taule,&nbsp;Inger Hellem,&nbsp;Irmelin Smith Eide,&nbsp;Kristin Gjelvik,&nbsp;Liv Elisabeth Hinderaker,&nbsp;Ingvild Kjeken,&nbsp;Bianca Rolfsnes-Flock,&nbsp;Merethe Hustoft","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2023.2273271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Involvement in research and shared priorities among occupational therapists (OTs) can enhance the quality of occupational therapy practice.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the research involvement and research priorities of OTs in Norway.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey comprising 14 open-ended and closed questions was made available to participants at the Seventh Norwegian Congress in Occupational Therapy to fill out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 633 congress participants, 307 (49%) OTs completed the survey. Among the respondents, ∼40% were involved in research. The most commonly reported area of research was rehabilitation. Research involvement was associated with employment in education or specialist healthcare services and with greater work experience and post-bachelor's degree education. The most frequently prioritized research question addressed the effect of occupational therapy. Unmet needs and factors conducive to increasing OT's involvement in research were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The survey revealed that a considerable, but uneven, distribution of OTs were involved in research. To encourage greater participation in research, researchers, decision-makers, and employee associations should take steps to make research more appealing to OTs. The research priorities highlighted by Norwegian OTs align with those stated by OTs in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of research involvement and priorities among occupational therapists in Norway.\",\"authors\":\"Tina Taule,&nbsp;Inger Hellem,&nbsp;Irmelin Smith Eide,&nbsp;Kristin Gjelvik,&nbsp;Liv Elisabeth Hinderaker,&nbsp;Ingvild Kjeken,&nbsp;Bianca Rolfsnes-Flock,&nbsp;Merethe Hustoft\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11038128.2023.2273271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Involvement in research and shared priorities among occupational therapists (OTs) can enhance the quality of occupational therapy practice.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the research involvement and research priorities of OTs in Norway.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey comprising 14 open-ended and closed questions was made available to participants at the Seventh Norwegian Congress in Occupational Therapy to fill out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 633 congress participants, 307 (49%) OTs completed the survey. Among the respondents, ∼40% were involved in research. The most commonly reported area of research was rehabilitation. Research involvement was associated with employment in education or specialist healthcare services and with greater work experience and post-bachelor's degree education. The most frequently prioritized research question addressed the effect of occupational therapy. Unmet needs and factors conducive to increasing OT's involvement in research were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The survey revealed that a considerable, but uneven, distribution of OTs were involved in research. To encourage greater participation in research, researchers, decision-makers, and employee associations should take steps to make research more appealing to OTs. The research priorities highlighted by Norwegian OTs align with those stated by OTs in other countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2273271\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2273271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:参与研究并在职业治疗师之间共享优先事项可以提高职业治疗实践的质量。目的:探讨OTs在挪威的研究参与情况和研究重点。材料和方法:向第七届挪威职业治疗大会的参与者提供了一项包括14个开放式和封闭式问题的在线调查,供他们填写。结果:在633名大会参与者中,307名(49%)OT完成了调查。在受访者中,约40%的人参与了研究。最常报道的研究领域是康复。研究参与与教育或专业医疗服务的就业有关,与更丰富的工作经验和学士学位后的教育有关。最常见的优先研究问题是职业治疗的效果。确定了未满足的需求和有助于增加OT参与研究的因素。结论和意义:调查显示,研究涉及相当多但不均匀的OT分布。为了鼓励更多人参与研究,研究人员、决策者和员工协会应采取措施,使研究对OT更有吸引力。挪威OTs强调的研究重点与其他国家OTs所述的研究重点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of research involvement and priorities among occupational therapists in Norway.

Background: Involvement in research and shared priorities among occupational therapists (OTs) can enhance the quality of occupational therapy practice.

Aims: To explore the research involvement and research priorities of OTs in Norway.

Materials and methods: An online survey comprising 14 open-ended and closed questions was made available to participants at the Seventh Norwegian Congress in Occupational Therapy to fill out.

Results: Out of 633 congress participants, 307 (49%) OTs completed the survey. Among the respondents, ∼40% were involved in research. The most commonly reported area of research was rehabilitation. Research involvement was associated with employment in education or specialist healthcare services and with greater work experience and post-bachelor's degree education. The most frequently prioritized research question addressed the effect of occupational therapy. Unmet needs and factors conducive to increasing OT's involvement in research were identified.

Conclusions and significance: The survey revealed that a considerable, but uneven, distribution of OTs were involved in research. To encourage greater participation in research, researchers, decision-makers, and employee associations should take steps to make research more appealing to OTs. The research priorities highlighted by Norwegian OTs align with those stated by OTs in other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信