{"title":"金属-聚合物和双金属-聚合物无铅辐射屏蔽的效率如何?","authors":"Zaker Salehi PhD, Mansour Tayebi Khorami PhD","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Lead shields are often used to attenuate ionising radiations. However, to make lighter, recyclable and more efficient shields compared to lead, combinations of new metallic compounds together with polymer, for example, flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC) have been developed recently. In this study, the capabilities of non-lead radiation shields made of one or two metallic compounds and polymer were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Monte Carlo (MC)-based BEAMnrc code was used to build a functional model based on a Philips X-ray machine in the range of radiographic energies. The MC model was then verified by IPEM Report 78 as a standardised global reference. The MC model was then used to evaluate the efficiency of non-lead-based garments made of metallic compound and polymer (MCP) including BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC, Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-PVC, Sn-PVC and W-PVC, as well as dual-metallic compounds and polymer (DMCP) including Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC, Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Sn-PVC, W-Sn-PVC and W-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC. The absorbed doses were determined at the surface of a water phantom and compared directly with the doses obtained for 0.5 mm pure lead (Pb).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC and W-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC were found to be efficient shields for most of the energies. In addition to the above radiation shields, Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Sn-PVC was also found to be effective for the spectrum of 60 keV. Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC as a non-lead dual metals-PVC shield was shown to be more efficient than pure lead in diagnostic X-ray range.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Combination of two metals-PVC, a low atomic number (Z) metal together with a high atomic number metal, and also single-metal-PVC shields were shown to be efficient enough to apply as radiation protection shields instead of lead-based garments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 1","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.733","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How efficient are metal-polymer and dual-metals-polymer non-lead radiation shields?\",\"authors\":\"Zaker Salehi PhD, Mansour Tayebi Khorami PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lead shields are often used to attenuate ionising radiations. However, to make lighter, recyclable and more efficient shields compared to lead, combinations of new metallic compounds together with polymer, for example, flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC) have been developed recently. In this study, the capabilities of non-lead radiation shields made of one or two metallic compounds and polymer were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Monte Carlo (MC)-based BEAMnrc code was used to build a functional model based on a Philips X-ray machine in the range of radiographic energies. The MC model was then verified by IPEM Report 78 as a standardised global reference. The MC model was then used to evaluate the efficiency of non-lead-based garments made of metallic compound and polymer (MCP) including BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC, Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-PVC, Sn-PVC and W-PVC, as well as dual-metallic compounds and polymer (DMCP) including Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC, Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Sn-PVC, W-Sn-PVC and W-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC. The absorbed doses were determined at the surface of a water phantom and compared directly with the doses obtained for 0.5 mm pure lead (Pb).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC and W-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC were found to be efficient shields for most of the energies. In addition to the above radiation shields, Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Sn-PVC was also found to be effective for the spectrum of 60 keV. Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-BaSO<sub>4</sub>-PVC as a non-lead dual metals-PVC shield was shown to be more efficient than pure lead in diagnostic X-ray range.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Combination of two metals-PVC, a low atomic number (Z) metal together with a high atomic number metal, and also single-metal-PVC shields were shown to be efficient enough to apply as radiation protection shields instead of lead-based garments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"57-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.733\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
How efficient are metal-polymer and dual-metals-polymer non-lead radiation shields?
Introduction
Lead shields are often used to attenuate ionising radiations. However, to make lighter, recyclable and more efficient shields compared to lead, combinations of new metallic compounds together with polymer, for example, flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC) have been developed recently. In this study, the capabilities of non-lead radiation shields made of one or two metallic compounds and polymer were evaluated.
Methods
Monte Carlo (MC)-based BEAMnrc code was used to build a functional model based on a Philips X-ray machine in the range of radiographic energies. The MC model was then verified by IPEM Report 78 as a standardised global reference. The MC model was then used to evaluate the efficiency of non-lead-based garments made of metallic compound and polymer (MCP) including BaSO4-PVC, Bi2O3-PVC, Sn-PVC and W-PVC, as well as dual-metallic compounds and polymer (DMCP) including Bi2O3-BaSO4-PVC, Bi2O3-Sn-PVC, W-Sn-PVC and W-BaSO4-PVC. The absorbed doses were determined at the surface of a water phantom and compared directly with the doses obtained for 0.5 mm pure lead (Pb).
Results
Bi2O3-BaSO4-PVC and W-BaSO4-PVC were found to be efficient shields for most of the energies. In addition to the above radiation shields, Bi2O3-Sn-PVC was also found to be effective for the spectrum of 60 keV. Bi2O3-BaSO4-PVC as a non-lead dual metals-PVC shield was shown to be more efficient than pure lead in diagnostic X-ray range.
Conclusion
Combination of two metals-PVC, a low atomic number (Z) metal together with a high atomic number metal, and also single-metal-PVC shields were shown to be efficient enough to apply as radiation protection shields instead of lead-based garments.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).