种植系统中区域杂草管理的意义、材料和能力

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rebecca Campbell, Kaitlyn Height, Gina Hawkes, Sonia Graham, Silja Schrader, Louise Blessington, Scott McKinnon
{"title":"种植系统中区域杂草管理的意义、材料和能力","authors":"Rebecca Campbell,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Height,&nbsp;Gina Hawkes,&nbsp;Sonia Graham,&nbsp;Silja Schrader,&nbsp;Louise Blessington,&nbsp;Scott McKinnon","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Area-wide collaboration across private and public property boundaries can enhance the management of weeds and minimise the spread of herbicide resistance. Yet we know little about the practices individual land managers engage in to achieve area-wide weed management (AWWM).</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This paper uses Social Practice Theory (SPT) as a framework to understand how cropping land managers engage with the practices of AWWM, and what the drivers and barriers are to their participation.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>30 qualitative interviews were undertaken with land managers in Australian cropping regions of the Darling Downs (Queensland), Gwydir (New South Wales), Riverina (New South Wales) and Sunraysia (Victoria). Thematic analysis of the interviews explored the three dimensions of SPT—meanings, materials, and competences—of AWWM and the interactions between these elements.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>There is a value-action gap between growers' desire to participate in AWWM practices and their capacity to do so. The analysis reveals that narrowing this gap requires interventions at the points where the SPT elements intersect. It recommends beginning by leveraging existing commonalities between growers who already have a desire to participate in AWWM then scaling out by encouraging trusted agronomist networks to link diverse growers to facilitate collaborative weed management practices. There is also a role for government in supporting the development of leadership capabilities among growers, providing an enabling environment for agronomists to act as systemic facilitators and leading by example on public land.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Most of the research on collective management of weeds has focused on formal groups in grazing systems. This study provides new insights into how and why weeds are largely managed independently in cropping systems and proposes ways growers may be supported to adopt more collaborative practices to address this landscape-scale problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 103776"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meanings, materials and competences of area-wide weed management in cropping systems\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Campbell,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Height,&nbsp;Gina Hawkes,&nbsp;Sonia Graham,&nbsp;Silja Schrader,&nbsp;Louise Blessington,&nbsp;Scott McKinnon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Area-wide collaboration across private and public property boundaries can enhance the management of weeds and minimise the spread of herbicide resistance. Yet we know little about the practices individual land managers engage in to achieve area-wide weed management (AWWM).</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This paper uses Social Practice Theory (SPT) as a framework to understand how cropping land managers engage with the practices of AWWM, and what the drivers and barriers are to their participation.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>30 qualitative interviews were undertaken with land managers in Australian cropping regions of the Darling Downs (Queensland), Gwydir (New South Wales), Riverina (New South Wales) and Sunraysia (Victoria). Thematic analysis of the interviews explored the three dimensions of SPT—meanings, materials, and competences—of AWWM and the interactions between these elements.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>There is a value-action gap between growers' desire to participate in AWWM practices and their capacity to do so. The analysis reveals that narrowing this gap requires interventions at the points where the SPT elements intersect. It recommends beginning by leveraging existing commonalities between growers who already have a desire to participate in AWWM then scaling out by encouraging trusted agronomist networks to link diverse growers to facilitate collaborative weed management practices. There is also a role for government in supporting the development of leadership capabilities among growers, providing an enabling environment for agronomists to act as systemic facilitators and leading by example on public land.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Most of the research on collective management of weeds has focused on formal groups in grazing systems. This study provides new insights into how and why weeds are largely managed independently in cropping systems and proposes ways growers may be supported to adopt more collaborative practices to address this landscape-scale problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X23001816\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X23001816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CONTEXT跨越私人和公共财产边界的全区域合作可以加强杂草管理,最大限度地减少除草剂耐药性的传播。然而,我们对个别土地管理者为实现区域杂草管理(AWWM)而采取的做法知之甚少。目的本文以社会实践理论(SPT)为框架,了解种植土地管理者如何参与AWWM的做法,以及他们参与的驱动因素和障碍是什么。方法对澳大利亚种植区Darling Downs(昆士兰)、Gwydir(新南威尔士)、Riverina(新南威尔士州)和Sunraysia(维多利亚州)的土地管理人员进行了30次定性访谈。访谈的主题分析探讨了SPT的三个维度——AWWM的含义、材料和能力——以及这些元素之间的相互作用。结果和结论种植者参与AWWM实践的愿望和他们这样做的能力之间存在价值-行动差距。分析表明,缩小这一差距需要在SPT要素交叉的点进行干预。它建议首先利用已经有意愿参与AWWM的种植者之间现有的共性,然后鼓励值得信赖的农学家网络将不同的种植者联系起来,以促进杂草管理的合作实践。政府在支持种植者领导能力的发展方面也发挥着作用,为农学家提供一个有利的环境,让他们成为系统的促进者,并在公共土地上以身作则。重要意义大多数关于杂草集体管理的研究都集中在放牧系统中的正式群体上。这项研究为在种植系统中如何以及为什么在很大程度上独立管理杂草提供了新的见解,并提出了支持种植者采用更多合作实践来解决这一景观规模问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meanings, materials and competences of area-wide weed management in cropping systems

CONTEXT

Area-wide collaboration across private and public property boundaries can enhance the management of weeds and minimise the spread of herbicide resistance. Yet we know little about the practices individual land managers engage in to achieve area-wide weed management (AWWM).

OBJECTIVE

This paper uses Social Practice Theory (SPT) as a framework to understand how cropping land managers engage with the practices of AWWM, and what the drivers and barriers are to their participation.

METHODS

30 qualitative interviews were undertaken with land managers in Australian cropping regions of the Darling Downs (Queensland), Gwydir (New South Wales), Riverina (New South Wales) and Sunraysia (Victoria). Thematic analysis of the interviews explored the three dimensions of SPT—meanings, materials, and competences—of AWWM and the interactions between these elements.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

There is a value-action gap between growers' desire to participate in AWWM practices and their capacity to do so. The analysis reveals that narrowing this gap requires interventions at the points where the SPT elements intersect. It recommends beginning by leveraging existing commonalities between growers who already have a desire to participate in AWWM then scaling out by encouraging trusted agronomist networks to link diverse growers to facilitate collaborative weed management practices. There is also a role for government in supporting the development of leadership capabilities among growers, providing an enabling environment for agronomists to act as systemic facilitators and leading by example on public land.

SIGNIFICANCE

Most of the research on collective management of weeds has focused on formal groups in grazing systems. This study provides new insights into how and why weeds are largely managed independently in cropping systems and proposes ways growers may be supported to adopt more collaborative practices to address this landscape-scale problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信