神经反馈治疗物质使用障碍的荟萃分析

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
G. Michael Russo, Samantha Smith, Katharine R. Sperandio
{"title":"神经反馈治疗物质使用障碍的荟萃分析","authors":"G. Michael Russo,&nbsp;Samantha Smith,&nbsp;Katharine R. Sperandio","doi":"10.1002/jcad.12466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of neurofeedback (NFB) in the treatment of individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) in between-group studies. This study reports findings from the first exhaustive search of the literature on the topic and included articles selected from a total of 58 databases/repositories. Studies were evaluated using Hedge's <i>g</i> as the effect size measure and were assessed for risk of bias using funnel plot, Fail-Safe <i>N</i>, and Trim and Fill analysis. Ten studies, containing 30 effect sizes were evaluated to determine the overall efficacy of NFB for decreasing symptoms of SUD (<i>N</i> = 397), yielding a mean effect size of <i>g</i> = –1.49 (CI 95 = –1.95, –1.03; PI 95 = –4.37 to 1.39). This meta-analysis provides strong evidence for the efficacy of NFB in treating SUD while also highlighting the value of wholistic client care in SUD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling and Development","volume":"101 2","pages":"143-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of neurofeedback for treating substance use disorders\",\"authors\":\"G. Michael Russo,&nbsp;Samantha Smith,&nbsp;Katharine R. Sperandio\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcad.12466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of neurofeedback (NFB) in the treatment of individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) in between-group studies. This study reports findings from the first exhaustive search of the literature on the topic and included articles selected from a total of 58 databases/repositories. Studies were evaluated using Hedge's <i>g</i> as the effect size measure and were assessed for risk of bias using funnel plot, Fail-Safe <i>N</i>, and Trim and Fill analysis. Ten studies, containing 30 effect sizes were evaluated to determine the overall efficacy of NFB for decreasing symptoms of SUD (<i>N</i> = 397), yielding a mean effect size of <i>g</i> = –1.49 (CI 95 = –1.95, –1.03; PI 95 = –4.37 to 1.39). This meta-analysis provides strong evidence for the efficacy of NFB in treating SUD while also highlighting the value of wholistic client care in SUD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling and Development\",\"volume\":\"101 2\",\"pages\":\"143-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcad.12466\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcad.12466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在组间研究中,进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估神经反馈(NFB)治疗物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的疗效。本研究报告了对该主题文献的首次详尽搜索结果,并包括从总共58个数据库/存储库中选择的文章。使用Hedge的g作为效应大小度量对研究进行评估,并使用漏斗图、故障安全N和修剪和填充分析评估偏差风险。评估了包含30个效应大小的10项研究以确定NFB降低SUD症状的总体疗效(N=397),得出的平均效应大小为g=-1.49(CI 95=-1.95,-1.03;PI 95=-4.37至1.39)。该荟萃分析为NFB治疗SUD的疗效提供了有力的证据,同时也强调了整体客户护理在SUD治疗中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A meta-analysis of neurofeedback for treating substance use disorders

A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of neurofeedback (NFB) in the treatment of individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) in between-group studies. This study reports findings from the first exhaustive search of the literature on the topic and included articles selected from a total of 58 databases/repositories. Studies were evaluated using Hedge's g as the effect size measure and were assessed for risk of bias using funnel plot, Fail-Safe N, and Trim and Fill analysis. Ten studies, containing 30 effect sizes were evaluated to determine the overall efficacy of NFB for decreasing symptoms of SUD (N = 397), yielding a mean effect size of g = –1.49 (CI 95 = –1.95, –1.03; PI 95 = –4.37 to 1.39). This meta-analysis provides strong evidence for the efficacy of NFB in treating SUD while also highlighting the value of wholistic client care in SUD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Counseling & Development publishes practice, theory, and research articles across 18 different specialty areas and work settings. Sections include research, assessment and diagnosis, theory and practice, and trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信