施用生物刺激剂对土壤生物和理化性质的影响:田间研究

Jenendra Wadduwage, Hongwei Liu, Eleonora Egidi, Brajesh K. Singh, Catriona A. Macdonald
{"title":"施用生物刺激剂对土壤生物和理化性质的影响:田间研究","authors":"Jenendra Wadduwage,&nbsp;Hongwei Liu,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Singh,&nbsp;Catriona A. Macdonald","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Despite their potential benefits, it is not well understood how the application of biostimulants influences soil biological properties and their microbial communities in field conditions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impacts of biostimulants on soil biological and physicochemical properties relevant to soil health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To achieve this, we conducted a field study to investigate the effects of two types of commercially available biostimulants, Universal Natural Plant food (UNP) and Converte Seed Primer (CSP), on microbial activity, bacterial and fungal abundance, community structure and diversity, and soil chemical and physical properties across two depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) from five sites under either wheat or pasture cultivation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that application of UNP stimulated microbial activity by 40.1% in surface (0–10 cm) and 36.4% in deeper (10–20 cm) soil, but was dependant on site. Effects were generally greater in grasslands compared with arable soils. At sites where UNP stimulated microbial respiration, substrate-induced respiration was also stimulated in surface soils and was associated with increased soil moisture content and higher total carbon and nitrogen. At the one site where UNP was combined with CSP, soil enzymes associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling were stimulated in UNP and UNP + CSP treatments. Total bacterial and fungal abundance and their alpha diversity did not respond to biostimulant treatment. However, microbial indicator communities were identified that responded positively to UNP and CSP addition across the two depths. Bacterial indicator species included <i>Elsterales, Propionibacteriales, Solibacterales, Candatus, Reyranellales</i> and <i>Sphingomonadales</i>, but differed between depths. For the fungal indicator species <i>Filobasidiales</i> (Basidiomycota) and <i>Pleosporales</i> (Ascomycota) were strong responders and common across both depths.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, our results suggest some positive effects of biostimulants on soil biological and physicochemical properties. Further long-term studies should be conducted to evaluate the effects of biostimulants on crop yield and farm resilience.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12057","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of biostimulant application on soil biological and physicochemical properties: A field study\",\"authors\":\"Jenendra Wadduwage,&nbsp;Hongwei Liu,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Singh,&nbsp;Catriona A. Macdonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sae2.12057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite their potential benefits, it is not well understood how the application of biostimulants influences soil biological properties and their microbial communities in field conditions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impacts of biostimulants on soil biological and physicochemical properties relevant to soil health.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>To achieve this, we conducted a field study to investigate the effects of two types of commercially available biostimulants, Universal Natural Plant food (UNP) and Converte Seed Primer (CSP), on microbial activity, bacterial and fungal abundance, community structure and diversity, and soil chemical and physical properties across two depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) from five sites under either wheat or pasture cultivation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest that application of UNP stimulated microbial activity by 40.1% in surface (0–10 cm) and 36.4% in deeper (10–20 cm) soil, but was dependant on site. Effects were generally greater in grasslands compared with arable soils. At sites where UNP stimulated microbial respiration, substrate-induced respiration was also stimulated in surface soils and was associated with increased soil moisture content and higher total carbon and nitrogen. At the one site where UNP was combined with CSP, soil enzymes associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling were stimulated in UNP and UNP + CSP treatments. Total bacterial and fungal abundance and their alpha diversity did not respond to biostimulant treatment. However, microbial indicator communities were identified that responded positively to UNP and CSP addition across the two depths. Bacterial indicator species included <i>Elsterales, Propionibacteriales, Solibacterales, Candatus, Reyranellales</i> and <i>Sphingomonadales</i>, but differed between depths. For the fungal indicator species <i>Filobasidiales</i> (Basidiomycota) and <i>Pleosporales</i> (Ascomycota) were strong responders and common across both depths.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, our results suggest some positive effects of biostimulants on soil biological and physicochemical properties. Further long-term studies should be conducted to evaluate the effects of biostimulants on crop yield and farm resilience.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12057\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言尽管生物刺激剂有潜在的好处,但人们还不清楚生物刺激剂的应用如何影响土壤生物特性及其在田间条件下的微生物群落。在本研究中,我们旨在评估生物刺激剂对与土壤健康相关的土壤生物和理化性质的影响。材料和方法为了实现这一点,我们进行了一项实地研究,研究了两种商业可用的生物刺激剂,通用天然植物食品(UNP)和转化种子引物(CSP)对微生物活性、细菌和真菌丰度、群落结构和多样性的影响,以及两个深度(0-10和10-20)的土壤化学和物理特性 cm)。结果我们的研究结果表明,UNP的应用刺激了表面40.1%的微生物活性(0-10 cm)和36.4%(10-20 cm)土壤,但取决于现场。与耕地相比,草原的影响通常更大。在UNP刺激微生物呼吸的地点,基质诱导的呼吸在表层土壤中也受到刺激,并与土壤含水量增加和总碳氮增加有关。在UNP与CSP结合的一个位点,与碳和氮循环相关的土壤酶在UNP和UNP中受到刺激 + CSP处理。细菌和真菌的总丰度及其α多样性对生物刺激剂处理没有反应。然而,在两个深度发现了对UNP和CSP添加有积极反应的微生物指示群落。细菌指示种包括Elsterales、丙酸杆菌目、Solibacteriales、Candatus、Reyranellales和Sphingomodales,但深度不同。对于真菌指示物种Filobasidiales(担子菌门)和Pleosporales(子囊菌门),反应强烈,在两个深度都很常见。结论总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,生物刺激剂对土壤的生物和理化性质有一些积极的影响。应进行进一步的长期研究,以评估生物刺激剂对作物产量和农场恢复力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of biostimulant application on soil biological and physicochemical properties: A field study

Effects of biostimulant application on soil biological and physicochemical properties: A field study

Introduction

Despite their potential benefits, it is not well understood how the application of biostimulants influences soil biological properties and their microbial communities in field conditions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impacts of biostimulants on soil biological and physicochemical properties relevant to soil health.

Materials and Methods

To achieve this, we conducted a field study to investigate the effects of two types of commercially available biostimulants, Universal Natural Plant food (UNP) and Converte Seed Primer (CSP), on microbial activity, bacterial and fungal abundance, community structure and diversity, and soil chemical and physical properties across two depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) from five sites under either wheat or pasture cultivation.

Results

Our findings suggest that application of UNP stimulated microbial activity by 40.1% in surface (0–10 cm) and 36.4% in deeper (10–20 cm) soil, but was dependant on site. Effects were generally greater in grasslands compared with arable soils. At sites where UNP stimulated microbial respiration, substrate-induced respiration was also stimulated in surface soils and was associated with increased soil moisture content and higher total carbon and nitrogen. At the one site where UNP was combined with CSP, soil enzymes associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling were stimulated in UNP and UNP + CSP treatments. Total bacterial and fungal abundance and their alpha diversity did not respond to biostimulant treatment. However, microbial indicator communities were identified that responded positively to UNP and CSP addition across the two depths. Bacterial indicator species included Elsterales, Propionibacteriales, Solibacterales, Candatus, Reyranellales and Sphingomonadales, but differed between depths. For the fungal indicator species Filobasidiales (Basidiomycota) and Pleosporales (Ascomycota) were strong responders and common across both depths.

Conclusion

Overall, our results suggest some positive effects of biostimulants on soil biological and physicochemical properties. Further long-term studies should be conducted to evaluate the effects of biostimulants on crop yield and farm resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信