八种GACs和替代吸附剂在多种地下水中去除PFAS的比较

Manmeet W. Pannu, Joseph Chang, Ricardo Medina, Scott A. Grieco, Michael Hwang, Megan H. Plumlee
{"title":"八种GACs和替代吸附剂在多种地下水中去除PFAS的比较","authors":"Manmeet W. Pannu,&nbsp;Joseph Chang,&nbsp;Ricardo Medina,&nbsp;Scott A. Grieco,&nbsp;Michael Hwang,&nbsp;Megan H. Plumlee","doi":"10.1002/aws2.1345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eight granular activated carbons (GACs) and one alternative adsorbent (AA) were evaluated using rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) to remove low level per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from several groundwaters. Results suggested variability among waters for adsorbents to reach breakthrough. Time to reach breakthrough appeared to be inversely proportional to the background dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Bituminous GACs (particularly F400 and UC1240LD) were more effective than non-bituminous. The elution order for PFAS was PFHxA (C6) &gt; PFBS (C4) &gt; PFOA (C8) &gt; PFHxS (C6) &gt; PFOS (C8). Multivariate regression predicted bed volumes at which F400 reached significant exhaustion (defined here as 60%) for PFOA using only two parameters (humic acid, DOC). This merits further study as these parameters could potentially be incorporated into models for predicting PFAS breakthrough. VOCs presence negatively impacted PFAS adsorption on GAC. Relative to GACs, the AA was not nearly as impacted by DOC and showed superior performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1345","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing PFAS removal across multiple groundwaters for eight GACs and alternative adsorbent\",\"authors\":\"Manmeet W. Pannu,&nbsp;Joseph Chang,&nbsp;Ricardo Medina,&nbsp;Scott A. Grieco,&nbsp;Michael Hwang,&nbsp;Megan H. Plumlee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aws2.1345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Eight granular activated carbons (GACs) and one alternative adsorbent (AA) were evaluated using rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) to remove low level per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from several groundwaters. Results suggested variability among waters for adsorbents to reach breakthrough. Time to reach breakthrough appeared to be inversely proportional to the background dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Bituminous GACs (particularly F400 and UC1240LD) were more effective than non-bituminous. The elution order for PFAS was PFHxA (C6) &gt; PFBS (C4) &gt; PFOA (C8) &gt; PFHxS (C6) &gt; PFOS (C8). Multivariate regression predicted bed volumes at which F400 reached significant exhaustion (defined here as 60%) for PFOA using only two parameters (humic acid, DOC). This merits further study as these parameters could potentially be incorporated into models for predicting PFAS breakthrough. VOCs presence negatively impacted PFAS adsorption on GAC. Relative to GACs, the AA was not nearly as impacted by DOC and showed superior performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AWWA water science\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1345\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AWWA water science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aws2.1345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AWWA water science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aws2.1345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用快速小规模柱试验(RSSCT)评估了八种颗粒活性炭(GACs)和一种替代吸附剂(AA),以从几种地下水中去除低水平的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)。结果表明,吸附剂达到突破的水之间存在差异。达到突破的时间似乎与背景溶解有机碳(DOC)成反比。沥青GACs(特别是F400和UC1240LD)比非沥青GACs更有效。PFAS的洗脱顺序为PFHxA(C6) >; PFBS(C4) >; PFOA(C8) >; PFHxS(C6) >; PFOS(C8)。多元回归仅使用两个参数(腐殖酸、DOC)预测了F400对全氟辛烷磺酸达到显著耗竭(此处定义为60%)的床层体积。这值得进一步研究,因为这些参数可能被纳入预测PFAS突破的模型中。挥发性有机物的存在对PFAS在GAC上的吸附产生了负面影响。相对于GACs,AA几乎没有受到DOC的影响,并且表现出优异的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing PFAS removal across multiple groundwaters for eight GACs and alternative adsorbent

Comparing PFAS removal across multiple groundwaters for eight GACs and alternative adsorbent

Eight granular activated carbons (GACs) and one alternative adsorbent (AA) were evaluated using rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) to remove low level per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from several groundwaters. Results suggested variability among waters for adsorbents to reach breakthrough. Time to reach breakthrough appeared to be inversely proportional to the background dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Bituminous GACs (particularly F400 and UC1240LD) were more effective than non-bituminous. The elution order for PFAS was PFHxA (C6) > PFBS (C4) > PFOA (C8) > PFHxS (C6) > PFOS (C8). Multivariate regression predicted bed volumes at which F400 reached significant exhaustion (defined here as 60%) for PFOA using only two parameters (humic acid, DOC). This merits further study as these parameters could potentially be incorporated into models for predicting PFAS breakthrough. VOCs presence negatively impacted PFAS adsorption on GAC. Relative to GACs, the AA was not nearly as impacted by DOC and showed superior performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信