伍尔夫斯坦大主教在《盎格鲁撒克逊编年史》中对埃德加国王的批评

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Nicholas Peter Schwartz
{"title":"伍尔夫斯坦大主教在《盎格鲁撒克逊编年史》中对埃德加国王的批评","authors":"Nicholas Peter Schwartz","doi":"10.1111/emed.12685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Archbishop Wulfstan of York’s interpolation in the DE version of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle entry for the year 959 is out of character for both the churchman himself and for the pre-Conquest period as a whole, as it is the only text from early England critical of King Edgar. This article shows that Wulfstan’s complaints about Edgar, which focus on the king’s policies related to Scandinavians in England, are rooted in the monarch’s probable official employment of Scandinavians and in the law code IV Edgar. Ultimately, this article argues that Wulfstan’s criticisms of Edgar are best understood in relation to the archbishop’s notion that royal policy could have significant long-term negative consequences, especially if such policy contravened Wulfstan’s understanding of the will of God.</p>","PeriodicalId":44508,"journal":{"name":"Early Medieval Europe","volume":"31 4","pages":"650-668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archbishop Wulfstan’s criticism of King Edgar in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Peter Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emed.12685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Archbishop Wulfstan of York’s interpolation in the DE version of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle entry for the year 959 is out of character for both the churchman himself and for the pre-Conquest period as a whole, as it is the only text from early England critical of King Edgar. This article shows that Wulfstan’s complaints about Edgar, which focus on the king’s policies related to Scandinavians in England, are rooted in the monarch’s probable official employment of Scandinavians and in the law code IV Edgar. Ultimately, this article argues that Wulfstan’s criticisms of Edgar are best understood in relation to the archbishop’s notion that royal policy could have significant long-term negative consequences, especially if such policy contravened Wulfstan’s understanding of the will of God.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"650-668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12685\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Medieval Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12685","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约克大主教伍尔夫斯坦(Wulfstan of York)在公元959年《盎格鲁撒克逊编年史》(Anglo Saxon Chronicle)条目的DE版本中的插入,对于这位牧师本人和整个征服前时期来说都不符合他的性格,因为这是早期英格兰唯一批评埃德加国王的文本。这篇文章表明,伍尔夫斯坦对埃德加的抱怨主要集中在国王对英格兰斯堪的纳维亚人的政策上,其根源在于国王可能对斯堪的那维亚人的正式雇佣以及法典四埃德加。最终,本文认为,伍尔夫斯坦对埃德加的批评最好与大主教的观点联系起来理解,即王室政策可能会产生重大的长期负面后果,特别是如果这种政策违背了伍尔夫斯坦对上帝意志的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Archbishop Wulfstan’s criticism of King Edgar in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle

Archbishop Wulfstan of York’s interpolation in the DE version of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle entry for the year 959 is out of character for both the churchman himself and for the pre-Conquest period as a whole, as it is the only text from early England critical of King Edgar. This article shows that Wulfstan’s complaints about Edgar, which focus on the king’s policies related to Scandinavians in England, are rooted in the monarch’s probable official employment of Scandinavians and in the law code IV Edgar. Ultimately, this article argues that Wulfstan’s criticisms of Edgar are best understood in relation to the archbishop’s notion that royal policy could have significant long-term negative consequences, especially if such policy contravened Wulfstan’s understanding of the will of God.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Medieval Europe
Early Medieval Europe MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Early Medieval Europe provides an indispensable source of information and debate on the history of Europe from the later Roman Empire to the eleventh century. The journal is a thoroughly interdisciplinary forum, encouraging the discussion of archaeology, numismatics, palaeography, diplomatic, literature, onomastics, art history, linguistics and epigraphy, as well as more traditional historical approaches. It covers Europe in its entirety, including material on Iceland, Ireland, the British Isles, Scandinavia and Continental Europe (both west and east).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信