致癌作用的生态学观点:生态位改变(NC3)机制

Cancer Innovation Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1002/cai2.54
Mesut Tez
{"title":"致癌作用的生态学观点:生态位改变(NC3)机制","authors":"Mesut Tez","doi":"10.1002/cai2.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the last 30 years, a new actor in the area of ecology and evolution has emerged: niche construction theory (NCT). The fundamental premise of NCT is that organisms may actively influence evolutionary processes by modifying their circumstances [<span>1</span>]⁠.</p><p>According to Trappes et al., [<span>2</span>] the concept of niche construction should only be applied to species that alter their environment, which they believe to be its intuitive scope. They add two more terms to describe the ways that organisms engage with their surroundings and so influence their niches: when organisms choose their environment, this is known as niche choice, and when they adapt their phenotype to fit their environment, this is known as niche conformance. These three concepts are often referred to as niche-altering mechanisms, or NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms: niche conformance, niche construction, and niche choice. This is in line with definitions of mechanisms developed in scientific philosophy [<span>2</span>]⁠.</p><p>Cancer was attempted to be explained using NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms in this essay.</p><p>Carcinogenesis is a three-stage process that includes initiation, progression, and metastasis [<span>3</span>]. Cancer initiation is an example of niche conformance. Phenotypic plasticity, or an organism's ability to develop distinct phenotypes in response to environmental variation, is involved in niche conformance. Unlike phenotypic plasticity, niche conformance also includes how phenotypic adjustment leads to changes in the phenotype-environment match and fitness [<span>2</span>]⁠.</p><p>The constant replacement of old cells with newly formed healthy differentiated cells (progeny) originating from adult stem cells regulates epithelial tissue turnover. Each differentiated cell in an organism expresses a subset of all the genes found in that species' genome. The pattern of gene expression defines a differentiated cell type (hepatocyte, enterocyte, and so on). Adult stem cells are thought to reside in many tissues within a niche formed by a group of cells and an extracellular matrix that provides an optimal environment for the adult stem cell. Furthermore, adult stem cells are resistant to apoptosis, making them more resistant to the damaging effects of environmental stress than their progeny [<span>4, 5</span>]⁠⁠.</p><p>The stress stimulus exposure consists of all current environmental parameters (including the stress stimulus) as well as the organism's phenome (all features of the organism at that moment). The phenomenon of ‘this particular moment’ bears the effects of all previous encounters; the organism has plasticity (the phenomenal repertoire it can demonstrate in response to environmental changes) and abilities due to all previous processes (both from the organism's own life process and from the processes of its ancestors). The organism's plasticity in the face of a stress stimulus is related to its genome, epigenome, phenom, and environment, which it carries as a result of all previous experiences and evolutionary processes. After the industrial revolution, the majority of stressors (mutagen or non-mutagen) were introduced into our modern lives (hostile-chaotic environment). Our forefathers were never exposed to the chemical, biological, and physical agents that we are exposed to on a daily basis. Simultaneously, we are getting most of our calories from sugar and high-fructose corn syrup and getting much less exercise. A hostile environment is one that is unpredictable. This environment can also be defined as one in which a suitable adaptation solution cannot be found. The lack of or delay in responding to a hostile environment also implies that detection by a sensor may result in a suboptimal response if the environment changes during the delay time. As a result, organisms have no choice but to respond to future uncertainty with the best answer they can provide. Response strategies that are deterministic-stochastic are the best options. Such mixed deterministic-stochastic strategies exist naturally. However, which stochastic strategy is best (chance/random, bet-hedging, or chaos)? Random or bet-hedging strategies are insufficient to explain adaptation to a hostile environment in a reasonable time. Previously-unknown stress reduces the lifespan of differentiated cells and somatic stem cells, causing them to rapidly and reversibly switch to producing an excess of progeny to regenerate the lost tissue. A chaotic system is constantly producing new information that could not have been predicted at the outset. “Chaos is learning without a teacher,” to put it succinctly. A chaotic system is constantly producing new information that could not have been predicted at the outset. Furthermore, chaos allows the system to store information. Cancer can be initiated by new phenomes that emerge as a result of chaotic dynamics [<span>6</span>]⁠.</p><p>Niche conformance can be applied to irreversible developmental changes across an individual's lifespan (nonlabile traits) as well as reversible modifications in response to the present environment (labile traits).</p><p>Tissues are made up of cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) and groups of tissues come together in structural and functional units to create organs. The organism is formed through the interaction of several organs via blood and lymphatic vessels. Mechanisms of niche creation are distinguished by the focused individual, actively changing its surroundings. Tumor tissue is an example of niche construction. Solid tumors are not random collections of cells and ECM, but rather resemble organs, although architecturally and physiologically dysfunctional ones. They include many cell types and extracellular matrix components, and they grow through complicated interactions between these various tissue components, employing mechanisms that are typically similar to those utilized by developing organs. For example, the multilayered epithelium with weak polarity found in early breast tumors mimics the rapidly proliferating and invading epithelium of the developing mammary gland's terminal end buds. In both the developing and mature mammary glands, the transcription factor GATA3 supports epithelial differentiation, organization, and survival. It plays comparable roles in early breast cancer. However, when the carcinomas progress to later, less differentiated stages, GATA3-negative, progenitor-like cells are selected. Surprisingly, restoring GATA3 expression in late-stage cancer cells results in the development of better differentiated and less metastatic tumors [<span>7</span>]⁠. Tumors, such as normal organs, interact with the rest of the organism. Thinking of tumors as niche construction mechanisms may help us better understand the processes that drive the development and progression of solid tumors.</p><p>An individual relocating to a different habitat, known as habitat choice, is a paradigmatic kind of niche choice [<span>2</span>]<i>⁠⁠</i>. This is sometimes a transitory or context-dependent option. Furthermore, competition among individuals for limited high-quality habitat might result in phenotype-environment correlations if certain individuals are driven into lower-quality habitat (rather than choosing this based on their choice in the absence of competition). The finest illustration of cancer niche selection is liver metastasis. The liver is a major location for cancer metastasis, accounting for roughly 25% of all instances. Although metastases are widespread in noncirrhotic livers, many autopsy investigations have established that they are uncommon in cirrhotic livers. A review of the main ideas for the development of metastatic illness is adequate to explain the prevalence of liver metastases in the general population and the comparative rarity of metastases in the cirrhotic liver. The “seed and soil” hypothesis, proposed by Stephen Paget in 1889, posits that the “seed” of metastatic tumor cells would only become a full-fledged metastasis if it reaches the suitable “soil” of a friendly environment, such as the otherwise healthy liver [<span>8</span>]⁠. The “seed and soil” hypothesis is a niche choice in terms of NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms.</p><p>In medical research, reductionism and specialization have led to key findings on both the processes of basic biological systems and the applications of how these systems might be managed. The reductionist approach has a blind hole in understanding and controlling complex biological systems such as cancer. The cross-pollination of scientific disciplines and ideas from one field of study to another has resulted in new paradigms and significant transformations that can be described as unexplainable leaps of logic. There are strong parallels between complex ecological systems and cancer. For example, given ecologists' success in understanding eco-evolutionary processes and managing pests under the integrated pest management framework, the question arises: might improved outcomes in cancer therapies be attained if oncologists begin to think like ecologists? NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms can be a good tool for this purpose.</p><p><b>Mesut Tez</b>: Writing – review &amp; editing.</p><p>The author declares no conflict of interest.</p><p>Not applicable.</p><p>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":100212,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Innovation","volume":"2 2","pages":"96-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cai2.54","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological view of carcinogenesis: Niche-altering (NC3) mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Mesut Tez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cai2.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the last 30 years, a new actor in the area of ecology and evolution has emerged: niche construction theory (NCT). The fundamental premise of NCT is that organisms may actively influence evolutionary processes by modifying their circumstances [<span>1</span>]⁠.</p><p>According to Trappes et al., [<span>2</span>] the concept of niche construction should only be applied to species that alter their environment, which they believe to be its intuitive scope. They add two more terms to describe the ways that organisms engage with their surroundings and so influence their niches: when organisms choose their environment, this is known as niche choice, and when they adapt their phenotype to fit their environment, this is known as niche conformance. These three concepts are often referred to as niche-altering mechanisms, or NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms: niche conformance, niche construction, and niche choice. This is in line with definitions of mechanisms developed in scientific philosophy [<span>2</span>]⁠.</p><p>Cancer was attempted to be explained using NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms in this essay.</p><p>Carcinogenesis is a three-stage process that includes initiation, progression, and metastasis [<span>3</span>]. Cancer initiation is an example of niche conformance. Phenotypic plasticity, or an organism's ability to develop distinct phenotypes in response to environmental variation, is involved in niche conformance. Unlike phenotypic plasticity, niche conformance also includes how phenotypic adjustment leads to changes in the phenotype-environment match and fitness [<span>2</span>]⁠.</p><p>The constant replacement of old cells with newly formed healthy differentiated cells (progeny) originating from adult stem cells regulates epithelial tissue turnover. Each differentiated cell in an organism expresses a subset of all the genes found in that species' genome. The pattern of gene expression defines a differentiated cell type (hepatocyte, enterocyte, and so on). Adult stem cells are thought to reside in many tissues within a niche formed by a group of cells and an extracellular matrix that provides an optimal environment for the adult stem cell. Furthermore, adult stem cells are resistant to apoptosis, making them more resistant to the damaging effects of environmental stress than their progeny [<span>4, 5</span>]⁠⁠.</p><p>The stress stimulus exposure consists of all current environmental parameters (including the stress stimulus) as well as the organism's phenome (all features of the organism at that moment). The phenomenon of ‘this particular moment’ bears the effects of all previous encounters; the organism has plasticity (the phenomenal repertoire it can demonstrate in response to environmental changes) and abilities due to all previous processes (both from the organism's own life process and from the processes of its ancestors). The organism's plasticity in the face of a stress stimulus is related to its genome, epigenome, phenom, and environment, which it carries as a result of all previous experiences and evolutionary processes. After the industrial revolution, the majority of stressors (mutagen or non-mutagen) were introduced into our modern lives (hostile-chaotic environment). Our forefathers were never exposed to the chemical, biological, and physical agents that we are exposed to on a daily basis. Simultaneously, we are getting most of our calories from sugar and high-fructose corn syrup and getting much less exercise. A hostile environment is one that is unpredictable. This environment can also be defined as one in which a suitable adaptation solution cannot be found. The lack of or delay in responding to a hostile environment also implies that detection by a sensor may result in a suboptimal response if the environment changes during the delay time. As a result, organisms have no choice but to respond to future uncertainty with the best answer they can provide. Response strategies that are deterministic-stochastic are the best options. Such mixed deterministic-stochastic strategies exist naturally. However, which stochastic strategy is best (chance/random, bet-hedging, or chaos)? Random or bet-hedging strategies are insufficient to explain adaptation to a hostile environment in a reasonable time. Previously-unknown stress reduces the lifespan of differentiated cells and somatic stem cells, causing them to rapidly and reversibly switch to producing an excess of progeny to regenerate the lost tissue. A chaotic system is constantly producing new information that could not have been predicted at the outset. “Chaos is learning without a teacher,” to put it succinctly. A chaotic system is constantly producing new information that could not have been predicted at the outset. Furthermore, chaos allows the system to store information. Cancer can be initiated by new phenomes that emerge as a result of chaotic dynamics [<span>6</span>]⁠.</p><p>Niche conformance can be applied to irreversible developmental changes across an individual's lifespan (nonlabile traits) as well as reversible modifications in response to the present environment (labile traits).</p><p>Tissues are made up of cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) and groups of tissues come together in structural and functional units to create organs. The organism is formed through the interaction of several organs via blood and lymphatic vessels. Mechanisms of niche creation are distinguished by the focused individual, actively changing its surroundings. Tumor tissue is an example of niche construction. Solid tumors are not random collections of cells and ECM, but rather resemble organs, although architecturally and physiologically dysfunctional ones. They include many cell types and extracellular matrix components, and they grow through complicated interactions between these various tissue components, employing mechanisms that are typically similar to those utilized by developing organs. For example, the multilayered epithelium with weak polarity found in early breast tumors mimics the rapidly proliferating and invading epithelium of the developing mammary gland's terminal end buds. In both the developing and mature mammary glands, the transcription factor GATA3 supports epithelial differentiation, organization, and survival. It plays comparable roles in early breast cancer. However, when the carcinomas progress to later, less differentiated stages, GATA3-negative, progenitor-like cells are selected. Surprisingly, restoring GATA3 expression in late-stage cancer cells results in the development of better differentiated and less metastatic tumors [<span>7</span>]⁠. Tumors, such as normal organs, interact with the rest of the organism. Thinking of tumors as niche construction mechanisms may help us better understand the processes that drive the development and progression of solid tumors.</p><p>An individual relocating to a different habitat, known as habitat choice, is a paradigmatic kind of niche choice [<span>2</span>]<i>⁠⁠</i>. This is sometimes a transitory or context-dependent option. Furthermore, competition among individuals for limited high-quality habitat might result in phenotype-environment correlations if certain individuals are driven into lower-quality habitat (rather than choosing this based on their choice in the absence of competition). The finest illustration of cancer niche selection is liver metastasis. The liver is a major location for cancer metastasis, accounting for roughly 25% of all instances. Although metastases are widespread in noncirrhotic livers, many autopsy investigations have established that they are uncommon in cirrhotic livers. A review of the main ideas for the development of metastatic illness is adequate to explain the prevalence of liver metastases in the general population and the comparative rarity of metastases in the cirrhotic liver. The “seed and soil” hypothesis, proposed by Stephen Paget in 1889, posits that the “seed” of metastatic tumor cells would only become a full-fledged metastasis if it reaches the suitable “soil” of a friendly environment, such as the otherwise healthy liver [<span>8</span>]⁠. The “seed and soil” hypothesis is a niche choice in terms of NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms.</p><p>In medical research, reductionism and specialization have led to key findings on both the processes of basic biological systems and the applications of how these systems might be managed. The reductionist approach has a blind hole in understanding and controlling complex biological systems such as cancer. The cross-pollination of scientific disciplines and ideas from one field of study to another has resulted in new paradigms and significant transformations that can be described as unexplainable leaps of logic. There are strong parallels between complex ecological systems and cancer. For example, given ecologists' success in understanding eco-evolutionary processes and managing pests under the integrated pest management framework, the question arises: might improved outcomes in cancer therapies be attained if oncologists begin to think like ecologists? NC<sup>3</sup> mechanisms can be a good tool for this purpose.</p><p><b>Mesut Tez</b>: Writing – review &amp; editing.</p><p>The author declares no conflict of interest.</p><p>Not applicable.</p><p>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Innovation\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"96-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cai2.54\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cai2.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cai2.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织由细胞和细胞外基质(ECM)组成,组织群以结构和功能单位聚集在一起,形成器官。生物体是由几个器官通过血液和淋巴管相互作用而形成的。生态位创造机制的特点是专注的个体,积极地改变其周围环境。肿瘤组织是生态位构建的一个例子。实体瘤不是细胞和ECM的随机集合,而是类似于器官,尽管在结构和生理上功能失调。它们包括许多细胞类型和细胞外基质成分,它们通过这些不同组织成分之间的复杂相互作用生长,所采用的机制通常与发育中的器官所使用的机制相似。例如,在早期乳腺肿瘤中发现的极性较弱的多层上皮模仿了正在发育的乳腺末端芽的快速增殖和侵袭上皮。在发育中和成熟的乳腺中,转录因子GATA3支持上皮分化、组织和存活。它在早期癌症中起着类似的作用。然而,当癌症发展到晚期、分化程度较低的阶段时,选择GATA3阴性的祖细胞样细胞。令人惊讶的是,在晚期癌症细胞中恢复GATA3的表达会导致分化更好、转移更少的肿瘤的发展[7]⁠. 肿瘤,如正常器官,与生物体的其他部分相互作用。将肿瘤视为小生境构建机制可能有助于我们更好地理解驱动实体瘤发展和进展的过程。个体迁移到不同的栖息地,即栖息地选择,是一种典型的生态位选择[2]⁠⁠. 这有时是一个暂时的或上下文相关的选项。此外,如果某些个体被驱入质量较低的栖息地(而不是在没有竞争的情况下根据自己的选择来选择),个体之间对有限的高质量栖息地的竞争可能会导致表型-环境相关性。癌症生态位选择的最佳例证是肝转移。肝脏是癌症转移的主要部位,约占所有病例的25%。尽管转移灶在非肝硬化肝脏中广泛存在,但许多尸检研究已经证实,它们在肝硬化肝脏中并不常见。对转移性疾病发展的主要观点进行综述,足以解释普通人群中肝转移的患病率和肝硬化中肝转移相对罕见的情况。斯蒂芬·佩吉特于1889年提出的“种子和土壤”假说认为,转移性肿瘤细胞的“种子”只有在到达友好环境的合适“土壤”(如健康的肝脏)时才会成为完全转移[8]⁠. 从NC3机制的角度来看,“种子和土壤”假说是一种生态位选择。在医学研究中,还原论和专业化导致了对基本生物系统过程和如何管理这些系统的应用的关键发现。还原论方法在理解和控制癌症等复杂生物系统方面存在盲点。科学学科和思想从一个研究领域到另一个领域的交叉授粉产生了新的范式和重大转变,这些范式和转变可以被描述为无法解释的逻辑飞跃。复杂的生态系统和癌症之间有着强烈的相似之处。例如,鉴于生态学家成功地理解了生态进化过程,并在综合害虫管理框架下管理了害虫,问题来了:如果肿瘤学家开始像生态学家一样思考,癌症治疗的结果是否会得到改善?NC3机制可以是实现这一目的的良好工具。梅苏特·泰兹:写作-评论&amp;编辑。提交人声明没有利益冲突。不适用。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological view of carcinogenesis: Niche-altering (NC3) mechanisms

Over the last 30 years, a new actor in the area of ecology and evolution has emerged: niche construction theory (NCT). The fundamental premise of NCT is that organisms may actively influence evolutionary processes by modifying their circumstances [1]⁠.

According to Trappes et al., [2] the concept of niche construction should only be applied to species that alter their environment, which they believe to be its intuitive scope. They add two more terms to describe the ways that organisms engage with their surroundings and so influence their niches: when organisms choose their environment, this is known as niche choice, and when they adapt their phenotype to fit their environment, this is known as niche conformance. These three concepts are often referred to as niche-altering mechanisms, or NC3 mechanisms: niche conformance, niche construction, and niche choice. This is in line with definitions of mechanisms developed in scientific philosophy [2]⁠.

Cancer was attempted to be explained using NC3 mechanisms in this essay.

Carcinogenesis is a three-stage process that includes initiation, progression, and metastasis [3]. Cancer initiation is an example of niche conformance. Phenotypic plasticity, or an organism's ability to develop distinct phenotypes in response to environmental variation, is involved in niche conformance. Unlike phenotypic plasticity, niche conformance also includes how phenotypic adjustment leads to changes in the phenotype-environment match and fitness [2]⁠.

The constant replacement of old cells with newly formed healthy differentiated cells (progeny) originating from adult stem cells regulates epithelial tissue turnover. Each differentiated cell in an organism expresses a subset of all the genes found in that species' genome. The pattern of gene expression defines a differentiated cell type (hepatocyte, enterocyte, and so on). Adult stem cells are thought to reside in many tissues within a niche formed by a group of cells and an extracellular matrix that provides an optimal environment for the adult stem cell. Furthermore, adult stem cells are resistant to apoptosis, making them more resistant to the damaging effects of environmental stress than their progeny [4, 5]⁠⁠.

The stress stimulus exposure consists of all current environmental parameters (including the stress stimulus) as well as the organism's phenome (all features of the organism at that moment). The phenomenon of ‘this particular moment’ bears the effects of all previous encounters; the organism has plasticity (the phenomenal repertoire it can demonstrate in response to environmental changes) and abilities due to all previous processes (both from the organism's own life process and from the processes of its ancestors). The organism's plasticity in the face of a stress stimulus is related to its genome, epigenome, phenom, and environment, which it carries as a result of all previous experiences and evolutionary processes. After the industrial revolution, the majority of stressors (mutagen or non-mutagen) were introduced into our modern lives (hostile-chaotic environment). Our forefathers were never exposed to the chemical, biological, and physical agents that we are exposed to on a daily basis. Simultaneously, we are getting most of our calories from sugar and high-fructose corn syrup and getting much less exercise. A hostile environment is one that is unpredictable. This environment can also be defined as one in which a suitable adaptation solution cannot be found. The lack of or delay in responding to a hostile environment also implies that detection by a sensor may result in a suboptimal response if the environment changes during the delay time. As a result, organisms have no choice but to respond to future uncertainty with the best answer they can provide. Response strategies that are deterministic-stochastic are the best options. Such mixed deterministic-stochastic strategies exist naturally. However, which stochastic strategy is best (chance/random, bet-hedging, or chaos)? Random or bet-hedging strategies are insufficient to explain adaptation to a hostile environment in a reasonable time. Previously-unknown stress reduces the lifespan of differentiated cells and somatic stem cells, causing them to rapidly and reversibly switch to producing an excess of progeny to regenerate the lost tissue. A chaotic system is constantly producing new information that could not have been predicted at the outset. “Chaos is learning without a teacher,” to put it succinctly. A chaotic system is constantly producing new information that could not have been predicted at the outset. Furthermore, chaos allows the system to store information. Cancer can be initiated by new phenomes that emerge as a result of chaotic dynamics [6]⁠.

Niche conformance can be applied to irreversible developmental changes across an individual's lifespan (nonlabile traits) as well as reversible modifications in response to the present environment (labile traits).

Tissues are made up of cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) and groups of tissues come together in structural and functional units to create organs. The organism is formed through the interaction of several organs via blood and lymphatic vessels. Mechanisms of niche creation are distinguished by the focused individual, actively changing its surroundings. Tumor tissue is an example of niche construction. Solid tumors are not random collections of cells and ECM, but rather resemble organs, although architecturally and physiologically dysfunctional ones. They include many cell types and extracellular matrix components, and they grow through complicated interactions between these various tissue components, employing mechanisms that are typically similar to those utilized by developing organs. For example, the multilayered epithelium with weak polarity found in early breast tumors mimics the rapidly proliferating and invading epithelium of the developing mammary gland's terminal end buds. In both the developing and mature mammary glands, the transcription factor GATA3 supports epithelial differentiation, organization, and survival. It plays comparable roles in early breast cancer. However, when the carcinomas progress to later, less differentiated stages, GATA3-negative, progenitor-like cells are selected. Surprisingly, restoring GATA3 expression in late-stage cancer cells results in the development of better differentiated and less metastatic tumors [7]⁠. Tumors, such as normal organs, interact with the rest of the organism. Thinking of tumors as niche construction mechanisms may help us better understand the processes that drive the development and progression of solid tumors.

An individual relocating to a different habitat, known as habitat choice, is a paradigmatic kind of niche choice [2]⁠⁠. This is sometimes a transitory or context-dependent option. Furthermore, competition among individuals for limited high-quality habitat might result in phenotype-environment correlations if certain individuals are driven into lower-quality habitat (rather than choosing this based on their choice in the absence of competition). The finest illustration of cancer niche selection is liver metastasis. The liver is a major location for cancer metastasis, accounting for roughly 25% of all instances. Although metastases are widespread in noncirrhotic livers, many autopsy investigations have established that they are uncommon in cirrhotic livers. A review of the main ideas for the development of metastatic illness is adequate to explain the prevalence of liver metastases in the general population and the comparative rarity of metastases in the cirrhotic liver. The “seed and soil” hypothesis, proposed by Stephen Paget in 1889, posits that the “seed” of metastatic tumor cells would only become a full-fledged metastasis if it reaches the suitable “soil” of a friendly environment, such as the otherwise healthy liver [8]⁠. The “seed and soil” hypothesis is a niche choice in terms of NC3 mechanisms.

In medical research, reductionism and specialization have led to key findings on both the processes of basic biological systems and the applications of how these systems might be managed. The reductionist approach has a blind hole in understanding and controlling complex biological systems such as cancer. The cross-pollination of scientific disciplines and ideas from one field of study to another has resulted in new paradigms and significant transformations that can be described as unexplainable leaps of logic. There are strong parallels between complex ecological systems and cancer. For example, given ecologists' success in understanding eco-evolutionary processes and managing pests under the integrated pest management framework, the question arises: might improved outcomes in cancer therapies be attained if oncologists begin to think like ecologists? NC3 mechanisms can be a good tool for this purpose.

Mesut Tez: Writing – review & editing.

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信