这就是你来的目的?大学-行业合作和公司的后续发明

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Paul-Emmanuel Anckaert, Hanne Peeters
{"title":"这就是你来的目的?大学-行业合作和公司的后续发明","authors":"Paul-Emmanuel Anckaert,&nbsp;Hanne Peeters","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The positive impact of university–industry collaborations on firms' innovative performance is well recognized. However, to date, the existing heterogeneity within university–industry collaboration processes and the sources of value creation underlying the resulting inventions are left underexplored. As a result, our understanding as to why some of the joint inventions resulting from such collaborations turn out to present a more fertile source of follow-on developments and value for the collaborating firm than others is limited. The present paper sheds light on this question through the application of a knowledge recombination perspective. Hence, we open the black box of innovation and put a spotlight on the knowledge components that make up the joint inventions resulting from university–industry collaborations. We evaluate how the nature—<i>scientific</i> versus <i>technological</i>—and origins—<i>internal</i> versus <i>external</i> to the collaborating partners—of these knowledge components relate to the inventive impact of the partners' joint invention. Examining a sample of 9102 USPTO co-patents, joint inventions created through university–industry collaborations are shown to be most fertile as a source of firm follow-on inventions when they are the result of a recombination process that includes <i>technological</i> knowledge components stemming from <i>both</i> collaborating partners. This effect is most pronounced when the partners' technological knowledge contributions are moderately similar. In contrast, when the joint technology development takes place in a technology domain that is novel to the firm, the resulting joint inventions are most fertile as a source of firm follow-on inventions when the university contributes through the input of <i>technological</i> knowledge components situated in exactly this technology domain that is novel to the firm. Remarkably, no evidence for such direct effects is found regarding the partners' <i>scientific</i> contributions. Together, these findings provide important insights for firms who intend to spur their internal technology development through collaboration with a university partner.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This is what you came for? University–industry collaborations and follow-on inventions by the firm\",\"authors\":\"Paul-Emmanuel Anckaert,&nbsp;Hanne Peeters\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpim.12650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The positive impact of university–industry collaborations on firms' innovative performance is well recognized. However, to date, the existing heterogeneity within university–industry collaboration processes and the sources of value creation underlying the resulting inventions are left underexplored. As a result, our understanding as to why some of the joint inventions resulting from such collaborations turn out to present a more fertile source of follow-on developments and value for the collaborating firm than others is limited. The present paper sheds light on this question through the application of a knowledge recombination perspective. Hence, we open the black box of innovation and put a spotlight on the knowledge components that make up the joint inventions resulting from university–industry collaborations. We evaluate how the nature—<i>scientific</i> versus <i>technological</i>—and origins—<i>internal</i> versus <i>external</i> to the collaborating partners—of these knowledge components relate to the inventive impact of the partners' joint invention. Examining a sample of 9102 USPTO co-patents, joint inventions created through university–industry collaborations are shown to be most fertile as a source of firm follow-on inventions when they are the result of a recombination process that includes <i>technological</i> knowledge components stemming from <i>both</i> collaborating partners. This effect is most pronounced when the partners' technological knowledge contributions are moderately similar. In contrast, when the joint technology development takes place in a technology domain that is novel to the firm, the resulting joint inventions are most fertile as a source of firm follow-on inventions when the university contributes through the input of <i>technological</i> knowledge components situated in exactly this technology domain that is novel to the firm. Remarkably, no evidence for such direct effects is found regarding the partners' <i>scientific</i> contributions. Together, these findings provide important insights for firms who intend to spur their internal technology development through collaboration with a university partner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Product Innovation Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Product Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12650\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12650","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大学与行业合作对企业创新绩效的积极影响是公认的。然而,到目前为止,大学-行业合作过程中存在的异质性以及由此产生的发明背后的价值创造来源尚未得到充分挖掘。因此,我们对为什么此类合作产生的一些联合发明为合作公司的后续发展和价值提供了比其他更丰富的来源的理解是有限的。本文从知识重组的角度对这一问题进行了探讨。因此,我们打开了创新的黑匣子,将焦点放在了构成大学与行业合作联合发明的知识组成部分上。我们评估了这些知识组成部分的性质——科学与技术——以及合作伙伴内部与外部的起源——与合作伙伴共同发明的创造性影响之间的关系。通过对9102项美国专利商标局共同专利的抽样研究,通过大学-行业合作创造的联合发明被证明是最丰富的企业后续发明来源,因为它们是重组过程的结果,其中包括来自两个合作伙伴的技术知识组成部分。当合作伙伴的技术知识贡献适度相似时,这种影响最为明显。相比之下,当联合技术开发发生在公司新颖的技术领域时,当大学通过输入恰好位于公司新颖的该技术领域的技术知识成分做出贡献时,由此产生的联合发明作为公司后续发明的来源是最丰富的。值得注意的是,在合作伙伴的科学贡献方面,没有发现这种直接影响的证据。总之,这些发现为那些打算通过与大学合作伙伴合作来促进内部技术开发的公司提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
This is what you came for? University–industry collaborations and follow-on inventions by the firm

The positive impact of university–industry collaborations on firms' innovative performance is well recognized. However, to date, the existing heterogeneity within university–industry collaboration processes and the sources of value creation underlying the resulting inventions are left underexplored. As a result, our understanding as to why some of the joint inventions resulting from such collaborations turn out to present a more fertile source of follow-on developments and value for the collaborating firm than others is limited. The present paper sheds light on this question through the application of a knowledge recombination perspective. Hence, we open the black box of innovation and put a spotlight on the knowledge components that make up the joint inventions resulting from university–industry collaborations. We evaluate how the nature—scientific versus technological—and origins—internal versus external to the collaborating partners—of these knowledge components relate to the inventive impact of the partners' joint invention. Examining a sample of 9102 USPTO co-patents, joint inventions created through university–industry collaborations are shown to be most fertile as a source of firm follow-on inventions when they are the result of a recombination process that includes technological knowledge components stemming from both collaborating partners. This effect is most pronounced when the partners' technological knowledge contributions are moderately similar. In contrast, when the joint technology development takes place in a technology domain that is novel to the firm, the resulting joint inventions are most fertile as a source of firm follow-on inventions when the university contributes through the input of technological knowledge components situated in exactly this technology domain that is novel to the firm. Remarkably, no evidence for such direct effects is found regarding the partners' scientific contributions. Together, these findings provide important insights for firms who intend to spur their internal technology development through collaboration with a university partner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信