生物文化创新:在生物圈和人种领域的交叉点上进行创新

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jarrod P. Vassallo, Sourindra Banerjee, Jaideep C. Prabhu
{"title":"生物文化创新:在生物圈和人种领域的交叉点上进行创新","authors":"Jarrod P. Vassallo,&nbsp;Sourindra Banerjee,&nbsp;Jaideep C. Prabhu","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scientists, economists, and politicians increasingly recognize that Indigenous peoples possess invaluable knowledge and practices that have the potential to drive innovation to solve critical global challenges. Indeed, thousands of important drugs—including lifesaving cancer treatments—have their origins in centuries old Indigenous knowledge and practices. Similarly, Indigenous practices have fueled the fast-growing regenerative agriculture industry that is able to yield windfall profits while sequestering carbon and enhancing biodiversity. Referred to in policy circles as <i>biocultural innovation</i>—a form of innovation that occurs at the intersection of the biosphere and ethnosphere—hundreds of diverse examples from a wide array of industries have been documented outside of the innovation literature. However, innovation scholars have yet to recognize or embrace biocultural innovation. We argue that this major oversight hinders practice and leaves untapped potential for solving issues such as slow or unsustainable economic growth, ecological decline, and inequality. To address this gap, we provide a clear definition of biocultural innovation, differentiate it from other innovation domains, and establish its conceptual foundations. Informed by economic theorizing that views the ethnosphere and biosphere as assets, we propose that these assets share four traits: <i>functionality</i>, <i>potentiality</i>, <i>vulnerability</i>, and <i>inseparability</i> (“<i>FPVI shared traits</i>”). Due to their immense biocultural diversity, we assert that these assets carry an “option value” representing enormous innovation potential that can be <i>converted</i>, <i>conserved</i>, or <i>constructed</i> to solve global challenges (the “<i>3Cs</i>”). We conclude by identifying promising avenues for future research on biocultural innovation and a call for action on how to unlock economic and social value while supporting biocultural assets and Indigenous rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"40 5","pages":"610-629"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpim.12669","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biocultural innovation: Innovating at the intersection of the biosphere and ethnosphere\",\"authors\":\"Jarrod P. Vassallo,&nbsp;Sourindra Banerjee,&nbsp;Jaideep C. Prabhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpim.12669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Scientists, economists, and politicians increasingly recognize that Indigenous peoples possess invaluable knowledge and practices that have the potential to drive innovation to solve critical global challenges. Indeed, thousands of important drugs—including lifesaving cancer treatments—have their origins in centuries old Indigenous knowledge and practices. Similarly, Indigenous practices have fueled the fast-growing regenerative agriculture industry that is able to yield windfall profits while sequestering carbon and enhancing biodiversity. Referred to in policy circles as <i>biocultural innovation</i>—a form of innovation that occurs at the intersection of the biosphere and ethnosphere—hundreds of diverse examples from a wide array of industries have been documented outside of the innovation literature. However, innovation scholars have yet to recognize or embrace biocultural innovation. We argue that this major oversight hinders practice and leaves untapped potential for solving issues such as slow or unsustainable economic growth, ecological decline, and inequality. To address this gap, we provide a clear definition of biocultural innovation, differentiate it from other innovation domains, and establish its conceptual foundations. Informed by economic theorizing that views the ethnosphere and biosphere as assets, we propose that these assets share four traits: <i>functionality</i>, <i>potentiality</i>, <i>vulnerability</i>, and <i>inseparability</i> (“<i>FPVI shared traits</i>”). Due to their immense biocultural diversity, we assert that these assets carry an “option value” representing enormous innovation potential that can be <i>converted</i>, <i>conserved</i>, or <i>constructed</i> to solve global challenges (the “<i>3Cs</i>”). We conclude by identifying promising avenues for future research on biocultural innovation and a call for action on how to unlock economic and social value while supporting biocultural assets and Indigenous rights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Product Innovation Management\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"610-629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpim.12669\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Product Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

科学家、经济学家和政治家越来越认识到,土著人民拥有宝贵的知识和实践,有潜力推动创新,解决关键的全球挑战。事实上,数千种重要药物——包括拯救生命的癌症治疗——起源于数百年前的土著知识和实践。同样,土著人的做法推动了快速增长的再生农业,该产业能够在封存碳和增强生物多样性的同时产生暴利。在政策界被称为生物文化创新——一种发生在生物圈和民族圈交叉点的创新形式——创新文献之外已经记录了来自广泛行业的数百个不同的例子。然而,创新学者尚未认识到或接受生物文化创新。我们认为,这一重大监督阻碍了实践,并为解决经济增长缓慢或不可持续、生态衰退和不平等等问题留下了未开发的潜力。为了解决这一差距,我们对生物文化创新进行了明确的定义,将其与其他创新领域区分开来,并建立了其概念基础。根据将民族圈和生物圈视为资产的经济理论,我们提出这些资产具有四个特征:功能性、潜力、脆弱性和不可分割性(“FPVI共享特征”)。由于其巨大的生物文化多样性,我们断言这些资产具有“期权价值”,代表着巨大的创新潜力,可以转换、保存或构建以解决全球挑战(“3C”)。最后,我们确定了未来生物文化创新研究的有希望的途径,并呼吁采取行动,在支持生物文化资产和土著权利的同时释放经济和社会价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biocultural innovation: Innovating at the intersection of the biosphere and ethnosphere

Biocultural innovation: Innovating at the intersection of the biosphere and ethnosphere

Scientists, economists, and politicians increasingly recognize that Indigenous peoples possess invaluable knowledge and practices that have the potential to drive innovation to solve critical global challenges. Indeed, thousands of important drugs—including lifesaving cancer treatments—have their origins in centuries old Indigenous knowledge and practices. Similarly, Indigenous practices have fueled the fast-growing regenerative agriculture industry that is able to yield windfall profits while sequestering carbon and enhancing biodiversity. Referred to in policy circles as biocultural innovation—a form of innovation that occurs at the intersection of the biosphere and ethnosphere—hundreds of diverse examples from a wide array of industries have been documented outside of the innovation literature. However, innovation scholars have yet to recognize or embrace biocultural innovation. We argue that this major oversight hinders practice and leaves untapped potential for solving issues such as slow or unsustainable economic growth, ecological decline, and inequality. To address this gap, we provide a clear definition of biocultural innovation, differentiate it from other innovation domains, and establish its conceptual foundations. Informed by economic theorizing that views the ethnosphere and biosphere as assets, we propose that these assets share four traits: functionality, potentiality, vulnerability, and inseparability (“FPVI shared traits”). Due to their immense biocultural diversity, we assert that these assets carry an “option value” representing enormous innovation potential that can be converted, conserved, or constructed to solve global challenges (the “3Cs”). We conclude by identifying promising avenues for future research on biocultural innovation and a call for action on how to unlock economic and social value while supporting biocultural assets and Indigenous rights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信