研讨会:全球税收公平——简介

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
James Banks, Anne Brockmeyer
{"title":"研讨会:全球税收公平——简介","authors":"James Banks,&nbsp;Anne Brockmeyer","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.12343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As inequality has risen around the world, the importance of tax design for achieving equity objectives has become increasingly widely discussed and is the focus of much recent public finance research. At the same time, globalisation and the increasing international mobility of capital have brought international and jurisdictional issues in tax policy to the fore for many countries and for the international community more generally.</p><p>This set of issues was showcased at the 4<sup>th</sup> World Bank Tax Conference in September 2022, which focused on ‘Global Tax Equity’. The meeting was hosted by the World Bank and organised jointly by the World Bank, the Overseas Development Institute, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and UK Aid, and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.1</p><p>The conference brought together leading researchers and policymakers to discuss the role of fiscal policy in dealing with the challenge of global inequality, both within countries and internationally, and how new data sources and research might inform such a debate. It featured discussions of recent research on making tax systems more equitable at a global scale, including the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, including wealth taxation; tax transparency, beneficial ownership, offshoring and tax havens; and taxes on multinationals and large corporations.</p><p>The set of perspectives papers in this symposium showcases some of the key policy questions and discussions from that meeting of academic researchers, tax and development practitioners and policymakers. In the paper entitled ‘Globalisation, taxation and inequality’, Gabriel Zucman summarises the arguments he presented in his keynote address to that conference. He discusses the way current tax systems heavily favour capital and capital income at the expense of labour, and argues this is not appropriate for our times. Whilst he welcomes some recent changes such as the advent of the global minimum tax, he also makes a number of further suggestions and recommendations for the future direction of national and international tax policy.</p><p>Three further short perspectives pieces then present brief commentaries and reactions to the points and issues raised by Zucman, predominantly from the perspective of tax policy in developing economies. The first is by Anne Brockmeyer and David Phillips who was the organiser of the policy session on global tax equity at the World Bank conference in which senior tax officials from Honduras, Indonesia and Argentina discussed specific issues with improving tax equity in their national contexts. Brockmeyer and Phillips discuss the specific proposals in the Zucman paper and suggest areas where more research is needed in order to establish the likely success or otherwise of such policies. They also pick up briefly on one of the points made by the Honduran tax officials in that policy session, since Honduras has sought to rationalise the incentives within its tax system in order to broaden the tax base, improve tax equity, and reduce the ways in which exemptions and concessions aimed at attracting foreign direct investment undermine the tax base.</p><p>Two further papers give reactions to the Zucman paper from the policymakers in Indonesia and Argentina who also contributed to the conference's policy session, each being co-authored with Vedanth Nair from the Centre for Tax Analysis in Developing Countries (TaxDev). These papers put a spotlight on a couple of the more specific and operational challenges with improving tax equity in developing countries and discuss the policy experiences with regard to this. The first of these, ‘Taxing high-net-worth individuals: experience from Indonesia’ by Vedanth Nair and Mekar Satria Utama, discusses the efforts Indonesia has made in curbing tax evasion and avoidance by the rich and relates these to the issues set out by Zucman. The Indonesian government opted to combine tax policy changes – an increased top tax rate – and tax administrative changes, by allocating high-net-worth individuals to specialised tax offices and introducing a temporary amnesty. Whilst initial evidence suggests that tax revenue has increased, the paper points out the need for a rigorous impact evaluation of the causal effect of the reform on tax revenues, reported wealth, income and real earnings, and the need to disentangle the effects of the tax policy changes from the effects of the administrative operational changes stemming from the new high-wealth tax offices and the temporary amnesty.</p><p>Following that, the article ‘Progressive taxation in the face of inflation and instability: lessons from Argentina’ by Roberto Arias and Vedanth Nair discusses the Argentinian experience of an annual wealth tax, which is one of the proposals put forward in the Zucman paper, to demonstrate that efforts to improve tax equity along the lines suggested by Zucman can be hampered by inflation and instability in low- and middle-income countries. While unanticipated inflation episodes have rendered the tax system less progressive, policy actions have recently been taken to retain progressivity – for example, by indexing bracket thresholds and fixing the share of the population liable for personal income tax. Picking up on one of the themes in the Zucman paper, Arias and Nair point out that Argentina has also embraced the recent progress in international tax cooperation and hopes to increase revenue collections as a result.</p><p>Taken together, these perspectives pieces demonstrate the extensive current interest in the area of global tax equity, whether defined nationally or internationally. They provide an overview of some of the motivating arguments for greater taxation of capital and more international coordination of capital taxes, and illustrate the need to include low- and middle-income countries in a discussion that could highlight the opportunities, but also some of the challenges to such arguments. The papers also provide a more specifically middle-income-country perspective on some of the issues raised in the recent <i>Fiscal Studies</i> symposium on the global minimum tax (volume 44, issue 1, published in March 2023) and the special issue on wealth taxes (volume 42, issues 3–4, published in October 2021). It is clear from these papers that this is a rich area of both policy reform and economic debate in developing economies, and one in which much more research could be highly valuable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51602,"journal":{"name":"Fiscal Studies","volume":"44 3","pages":"225-227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-5890.12343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symposium: tax equity around the world – introduction\",\"authors\":\"James Banks,&nbsp;Anne Brockmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-5890.12343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As inequality has risen around the world, the importance of tax design for achieving equity objectives has become increasingly widely discussed and is the focus of much recent public finance research. At the same time, globalisation and the increasing international mobility of capital have brought international and jurisdictional issues in tax policy to the fore for many countries and for the international community more generally.</p><p>This set of issues was showcased at the 4<sup>th</sup> World Bank Tax Conference in September 2022, which focused on ‘Global Tax Equity’. The meeting was hosted by the World Bank and organised jointly by the World Bank, the Overseas Development Institute, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and UK Aid, and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.1</p><p>The conference brought together leading researchers and policymakers to discuss the role of fiscal policy in dealing with the challenge of global inequality, both within countries and internationally, and how new data sources and research might inform such a debate. It featured discussions of recent research on making tax systems more equitable at a global scale, including the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, including wealth taxation; tax transparency, beneficial ownership, offshoring and tax havens; and taxes on multinationals and large corporations.</p><p>The set of perspectives papers in this symposium showcases some of the key policy questions and discussions from that meeting of academic researchers, tax and development practitioners and policymakers. In the paper entitled ‘Globalisation, taxation and inequality’, Gabriel Zucman summarises the arguments he presented in his keynote address to that conference. He discusses the way current tax systems heavily favour capital and capital income at the expense of labour, and argues this is not appropriate for our times. Whilst he welcomes some recent changes such as the advent of the global minimum tax, he also makes a number of further suggestions and recommendations for the future direction of national and international tax policy.</p><p>Three further short perspectives pieces then present brief commentaries and reactions to the points and issues raised by Zucman, predominantly from the perspective of tax policy in developing economies. The first is by Anne Brockmeyer and David Phillips who was the organiser of the policy session on global tax equity at the World Bank conference in which senior tax officials from Honduras, Indonesia and Argentina discussed specific issues with improving tax equity in their national contexts. Brockmeyer and Phillips discuss the specific proposals in the Zucman paper and suggest areas where more research is needed in order to establish the likely success or otherwise of such policies. They also pick up briefly on one of the points made by the Honduran tax officials in that policy session, since Honduras has sought to rationalise the incentives within its tax system in order to broaden the tax base, improve tax equity, and reduce the ways in which exemptions and concessions aimed at attracting foreign direct investment undermine the tax base.</p><p>Two further papers give reactions to the Zucman paper from the policymakers in Indonesia and Argentina who also contributed to the conference's policy session, each being co-authored with Vedanth Nair from the Centre for Tax Analysis in Developing Countries (TaxDev). These papers put a spotlight on a couple of the more specific and operational challenges with improving tax equity in developing countries and discuss the policy experiences with regard to this. The first of these, ‘Taxing high-net-worth individuals: experience from Indonesia’ by Vedanth Nair and Mekar Satria Utama, discusses the efforts Indonesia has made in curbing tax evasion and avoidance by the rich and relates these to the issues set out by Zucman. The Indonesian government opted to combine tax policy changes – an increased top tax rate – and tax administrative changes, by allocating high-net-worth individuals to specialised tax offices and introducing a temporary amnesty. Whilst initial evidence suggests that tax revenue has increased, the paper points out the need for a rigorous impact evaluation of the causal effect of the reform on tax revenues, reported wealth, income and real earnings, and the need to disentangle the effects of the tax policy changes from the effects of the administrative operational changes stemming from the new high-wealth tax offices and the temporary amnesty.</p><p>Following that, the article ‘Progressive taxation in the face of inflation and instability: lessons from Argentina’ by Roberto Arias and Vedanth Nair discusses the Argentinian experience of an annual wealth tax, which is one of the proposals put forward in the Zucman paper, to demonstrate that efforts to improve tax equity along the lines suggested by Zucman can be hampered by inflation and instability in low- and middle-income countries. While unanticipated inflation episodes have rendered the tax system less progressive, policy actions have recently been taken to retain progressivity – for example, by indexing bracket thresholds and fixing the share of the population liable for personal income tax. Picking up on one of the themes in the Zucman paper, Arias and Nair point out that Argentina has also embraced the recent progress in international tax cooperation and hopes to increase revenue collections as a result.</p><p>Taken together, these perspectives pieces demonstrate the extensive current interest in the area of global tax equity, whether defined nationally or internationally. They provide an overview of some of the motivating arguments for greater taxation of capital and more international coordination of capital taxes, and illustrate the need to include low- and middle-income countries in a discussion that could highlight the opportunities, but also some of the challenges to such arguments. The papers also provide a more specifically middle-income-country perspective on some of the issues raised in the recent <i>Fiscal Studies</i> symposium on the global minimum tax (volume 44, issue 1, published in March 2023) and the special issue on wealth taxes (volume 42, issues 3–4, published in October 2021). It is clear from these papers that this is a rich area of both policy reform and economic debate in developing economies, and one in which much more research could be highly valuable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fiscal Studies\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"225-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-5890.12343\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fiscal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-5890.12343\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiscal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-5890.12343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着世界各地不平等现象的加剧,税收设计对实现公平目标的重要性越来越受到广泛讨论,也是最近公共财政研究的焦点。与此同时,全球化和资本国际流动性的增加,使许多国家和国际社会在税收政策方面的国际和管辖权问题凸显出来。这一系列问题在2022年9月举行的第四届世界银行税务会议上进行了展示,会议重点讨论了“全球税收公平”。会议由世界银行主办,世界银行、海外发展研究所、财政研究所、英国外交、联邦和发展办公室和英国援助组织联合组织,以及挪威生命科学大学。1会议汇集了领先的研究人员和政策制定者,讨论了财政政策在应对国内外全球不平等挑战方面的作用,以及新的数据来源和研究如何为这场辩论提供信息。其中讨论了最近关于在全球范围内使税收制度更加公平的研究,包括对高净值个人征税,包括财富税;税收透明度、实益所有权、离岸外包和避税天堂;以及对跨国公司和大公司征税。本次研讨会上的一系列观点论文展示了学术研究人员、税务和发展从业者以及政策制定者会议上的一些关键政策问题和讨论。在题为“全球化、税收和不平等”的论文中,Gabriel Zucman总结了他在会议主题演讲中提出的论点。他讨论了现行税收制度以牺牲劳动力为代价,大力支持资本和资本收入的方式,并认为这不适合我们的时代。虽然他欢迎最近的一些变化,如全球最低税的出现,但他也对国家和国际税收政策的未来方向提出了一些进一步的建议和建议。接下来,三篇简短的观点文章主要从发展中经济体的税收政策角度,对祖克曼提出的观点和问题进行了简短的评论和反应。第一位是Anne Brockmeyer和David Phillips,他们是世界银行会议全球税收公平政策会议的组织者,来自洪都拉斯、印度尼西亚和阿根廷的高级税务官员在会上讨论了在各自国家背景下改善税收公平的具体问题。Brockmeyer和Phillips讨论了Zucman论文中的具体建议,并提出了需要更多研究的领域,以确定此类政策可能取得的成功。他们还简要介绍了洪都拉斯税务官员在那次政策会议上提出的一点,因为洪都拉斯一直在寻求使其税收系统内的激励措施合理化,以扩大税基,改善税收公平,并减少旨在吸引外国直接投资的豁免和减让破坏税基的方式。印度尼西亚和阿根廷的政策制定者也为会议的政策会议做出了贡献,另外两篇论文对Zucman的论文做出了回应,每一篇都是与发展中国家税收分析中心(TaxDev)的Vedanth Nair合著的。这些文件重点介绍了在改善发展中国家税收公平方面的一些更具体和操作性的挑战,并讨论了这方面的政策经验。其中第一篇是Vedanth Nair和Mekar Satria Utama的《对高净值个人征税:印度尼西亚的经验》,讨论了印度尼西亚在遏制富人逃税和避税方面所做的努力,并将其与Zucman提出的问题联系起来。印尼政府选择将税收政策改革——提高最高税率——与税收管理改革相结合,将高净值个人分配到专门的税务办公室,并实行临时特赦。虽然初步证据表明税收有所增加,但该文件指出,有必要对改革对税收、报告财富、收入和实际收入的因果影响进行严格的影响评估,以及有必要将税收政策变化的影响与新的高财富税办公室和临时大赦引起的行政运作变化的影响区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symposium: tax equity around the world – introduction

As inequality has risen around the world, the importance of tax design for achieving equity objectives has become increasingly widely discussed and is the focus of much recent public finance research. At the same time, globalisation and the increasing international mobility of capital have brought international and jurisdictional issues in tax policy to the fore for many countries and for the international community more generally.

This set of issues was showcased at the 4th World Bank Tax Conference in September 2022, which focused on ‘Global Tax Equity’. The meeting was hosted by the World Bank and organised jointly by the World Bank, the Overseas Development Institute, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and UK Aid, and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.1

The conference brought together leading researchers and policymakers to discuss the role of fiscal policy in dealing with the challenge of global inequality, both within countries and internationally, and how new data sources and research might inform such a debate. It featured discussions of recent research on making tax systems more equitable at a global scale, including the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, including wealth taxation; tax transparency, beneficial ownership, offshoring and tax havens; and taxes on multinationals and large corporations.

The set of perspectives papers in this symposium showcases some of the key policy questions and discussions from that meeting of academic researchers, tax and development practitioners and policymakers. In the paper entitled ‘Globalisation, taxation and inequality’, Gabriel Zucman summarises the arguments he presented in his keynote address to that conference. He discusses the way current tax systems heavily favour capital and capital income at the expense of labour, and argues this is not appropriate for our times. Whilst he welcomes some recent changes such as the advent of the global minimum tax, he also makes a number of further suggestions and recommendations for the future direction of national and international tax policy.

Three further short perspectives pieces then present brief commentaries and reactions to the points and issues raised by Zucman, predominantly from the perspective of tax policy in developing economies. The first is by Anne Brockmeyer and David Phillips who was the organiser of the policy session on global tax equity at the World Bank conference in which senior tax officials from Honduras, Indonesia and Argentina discussed specific issues with improving tax equity in their national contexts. Brockmeyer and Phillips discuss the specific proposals in the Zucman paper and suggest areas where more research is needed in order to establish the likely success or otherwise of such policies. They also pick up briefly on one of the points made by the Honduran tax officials in that policy session, since Honduras has sought to rationalise the incentives within its tax system in order to broaden the tax base, improve tax equity, and reduce the ways in which exemptions and concessions aimed at attracting foreign direct investment undermine the tax base.

Two further papers give reactions to the Zucman paper from the policymakers in Indonesia and Argentina who also contributed to the conference's policy session, each being co-authored with Vedanth Nair from the Centre for Tax Analysis in Developing Countries (TaxDev). These papers put a spotlight on a couple of the more specific and operational challenges with improving tax equity in developing countries and discuss the policy experiences with regard to this. The first of these, ‘Taxing high-net-worth individuals: experience from Indonesia’ by Vedanth Nair and Mekar Satria Utama, discusses the efforts Indonesia has made in curbing tax evasion and avoidance by the rich and relates these to the issues set out by Zucman. The Indonesian government opted to combine tax policy changes – an increased top tax rate – and tax administrative changes, by allocating high-net-worth individuals to specialised tax offices and introducing a temporary amnesty. Whilst initial evidence suggests that tax revenue has increased, the paper points out the need for a rigorous impact evaluation of the causal effect of the reform on tax revenues, reported wealth, income and real earnings, and the need to disentangle the effects of the tax policy changes from the effects of the administrative operational changes stemming from the new high-wealth tax offices and the temporary amnesty.

Following that, the article ‘Progressive taxation in the face of inflation and instability: lessons from Argentina’ by Roberto Arias and Vedanth Nair discusses the Argentinian experience of an annual wealth tax, which is one of the proposals put forward in the Zucman paper, to demonstrate that efforts to improve tax equity along the lines suggested by Zucman can be hampered by inflation and instability in low- and middle-income countries. While unanticipated inflation episodes have rendered the tax system less progressive, policy actions have recently been taken to retain progressivity – for example, by indexing bracket thresholds and fixing the share of the population liable for personal income tax. Picking up on one of the themes in the Zucman paper, Arias and Nair point out that Argentina has also embraced the recent progress in international tax cooperation and hopes to increase revenue collections as a result.

Taken together, these perspectives pieces demonstrate the extensive current interest in the area of global tax equity, whether defined nationally or internationally. They provide an overview of some of the motivating arguments for greater taxation of capital and more international coordination of capital taxes, and illustrate the need to include low- and middle-income countries in a discussion that could highlight the opportunities, but also some of the challenges to such arguments. The papers also provide a more specifically middle-income-country perspective on some of the issues raised in the recent Fiscal Studies symposium on the global minimum tax (volume 44, issue 1, published in March 2023) and the special issue on wealth taxes (volume 42, issues 3–4, published in October 2021). It is clear from these papers that this is a rich area of both policy reform and economic debate in developing economies, and one in which much more research could be highly valuable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fiscal Studies
Fiscal Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Institute for Fiscal Studies publishes the journal Fiscal Studies, which serves as a bridge between academic research and policy. This esteemed journal, established in 1979, has gained global recognition for its publication of high-quality and original research papers. The articles, authored by prominent academics, policymakers, and practitioners, are presented in an accessible format, ensuring a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信