Lucas RONCONI, Ravi KANBUR, Santiago LÓPEZ-CARIBONI
{"title":"谁要求发展中国家实行劳动管制?重新审视内部人-外部人理论*","authors":"Lucas RONCONI, Ravi KANBUR, Santiago LÓPEZ-CARIBONI","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The “insider–outsider” perspective, which dominates the discourse on labour regulations, argues that protective regulations hurt the less well-off outsiders but are kept in place in the interests of the insiders, who are covered by the regulations. Thus, if the insider–outsider divide were as depicted in the standard representation, outsiders would be strongly against regulations. Our evidence that a large majority of outsiders in developing countries in fact support protective labour regulations calls for a rethink of the sharp insider–outsider divide. We suggest a number of avenues for exploration, including income-sharing, transitions, fairness and employer power in labour markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"162 2","pages":"223-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who demands labour (de)regulation in the developing world? Revisiting the insider–outsider theory*\",\"authors\":\"Lucas RONCONI, Ravi KANBUR, Santiago LÓPEZ-CARIBONI\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The “insider–outsider” perspective, which dominates the discourse on labour regulations, argues that protective regulations hurt the less well-off outsiders but are kept in place in the interests of the insiders, who are covered by the regulations. Thus, if the insider–outsider divide were as depicted in the standard representation, outsiders would be strongly against regulations. Our evidence that a large majority of outsiders in developing countries in fact support protective labour regulations calls for a rethink of the sharp insider–outsider divide. We suggest a number of avenues for exploration, including income-sharing, transitions, fairness and employer power in labour markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"162 2\",\"pages\":\"223-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Who demands labour (de)regulation in the developing world? Revisiting the insider–outsider theory*
The “insider–outsider” perspective, which dominates the discourse on labour regulations, argues that protective regulations hurt the less well-off outsiders but are kept in place in the interests of the insiders, who are covered by the regulations. Thus, if the insider–outsider divide were as depicted in the standard representation, outsiders would be strongly against regulations. Our evidence that a large majority of outsiders in developing countries in fact support protective labour regulations calls for a rethink of the sharp insider–outsider divide. We suggest a number of avenues for exploration, including income-sharing, transitions, fairness and employer power in labour markets.
期刊介绍:
The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.