移动货币税和非正规工人:来自加纳电子税的证据

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Nana Akua Anyidoho, Max Gallien, Mike Rogan, Vanessa van den Boogaard
{"title":"移动货币税和非正规工人:来自加纳电子税的证据","authors":"Nana Akua Anyidoho,&nbsp;Max Gallien,&nbsp;Mike Rogan,&nbsp;Vanessa van den Boogaard","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>In recent years, governments in low-income countries have increasingly introduced taxes on mobile money transfers. These are often explicitly promoted as a way of taxing informal economic activity, but critics have noted their potential negative impact on lower-income groups and specifically those in the informal sector. Yet there is virtually no evidence base on the effects of mobile money taxes on informal workers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This article assesses how informal workers in Accra, Ghana, use mobile money and how they perceive Ghana's Electronic Transfer Levy (E-levy), introduced in May 2022. This provides a particularly interesting case study to explore the equity implications of the tax, as the policy was explicitly justified as a way of taxing the informal economy but also includes measures to limit the tax burden on lower-income groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\n \n <p>The article uses data from a survey of 2,700 self-employed informal workers in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly to capture citizen perceptions of the policy and to examine the likely impact of the E-levy on informal workers with reference to equity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, our results suggest that the E-levy is highly regressive. Further, we show that most informal workers disapprove of the E-levy, reflecting not just concerns about its equity impacts, but also disappointment with the government's performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that taxes on digital financial services should be reconsidered from an equity perspective. While some policy measures, including those undertaken in Ghana, can protect low-income earners, they are often insufficient to counteract overall regressive impacts. Where they are implemented, social spending from the revenue from these taxes should target low-income populations in the informal economy, while governments should focus on building trust among informal workers with regard to revenue raising and spending.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile money taxation and informal workers: Evidence from Ghana's E-levy\",\"authors\":\"Nana Akua Anyidoho,&nbsp;Max Gallien,&nbsp;Mike Rogan,&nbsp;Vanessa van den Boogaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dpr.12704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Motivation</h3>\\n \\n <p>In recent years, governments in low-income countries have increasingly introduced taxes on mobile money transfers. These are often explicitly promoted as a way of taxing informal economic activity, but critics have noted their potential negative impact on lower-income groups and specifically those in the informal sector. Yet there is virtually no evidence base on the effects of mobile money taxes on informal workers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This article assesses how informal workers in Accra, Ghana, use mobile money and how they perceive Ghana's Electronic Transfer Levy (E-levy), introduced in May 2022. This provides a particularly interesting case study to explore the equity implications of the tax, as the policy was explicitly justified as a way of taxing the informal economy but also includes measures to limit the tax burden on lower-income groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>The article uses data from a survey of 2,700 self-employed informal workers in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly to capture citizen perceptions of the policy and to examine the likely impact of the E-levy on informal workers with reference to equity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, our results suggest that the E-levy is highly regressive. Further, we show that most informal workers disapprove of the E-levy, reflecting not just concerns about its equity impacts, but also disappointment with the government's performance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest that taxes on digital financial services should be reconsidered from an equity perspective. While some policy measures, including those undertaken in Ghana, can protect low-income earners, they are often insufficient to counteract overall regressive impacts. Where they are implemented, social spending from the revenue from these taxes should target low-income populations in the informal economy, while governments should focus on building trust among informal workers with regard to revenue raising and spending.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12704\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动机近年来,低收入国家的政府越来越多地对移动汇款征税。这些措施通常被明确宣传为对非正规经济活动征税的一种方式,但批评者指出,它们对低收入群体,特别是非正规部门的低收入群体可能产生负面影响。然而,几乎没有证据表明移动货币税对非正规工人的影响。目的本文评估了加纳阿克拉的非正规工人如何使用移动货币,以及他们如何看待加纳于2022年5月推出的电子转账税。这为探索税收的公平影响提供了一个特别有趣的案例研究,因为该政策被明确证明是对非正规经济征税的一种方式,但也包括限制低收入群体税收负担的措施。方法和方法本文使用了阿克拉大都会议会对2700名自营职业非正规工人的调查数据,以了解公民对该政策的看法,并根据公平性考察电子税对非正规工人可能产生的影响。研究结果总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,电子税是高度回归的。此外,我们发现大多数非正规工人不赞成电子税,这不仅反映了对其公平影响的担忧,也反映了对政府表现的失望。政策含义我们的研究结果表明,应该从公平的角度重新考虑数字金融服务税。虽然一些政策措施,包括在加纳采取的政策措施,可以保护低收入者,但它们往往不足以抵消总体倒退的影响。在实施这些税收的地方,这些税收收入的社会支出应针对非正规经济中的低收入人群,而政府应专注于在非正规工人之间建立收入和支出方面的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobile money taxation and informal workers: Evidence from Ghana's E-levy

Motivation

In recent years, governments in low-income countries have increasingly introduced taxes on mobile money transfers. These are often explicitly promoted as a way of taxing informal economic activity, but critics have noted their potential negative impact on lower-income groups and specifically those in the informal sector. Yet there is virtually no evidence base on the effects of mobile money taxes on informal workers.

Purpose

This article assesses how informal workers in Accra, Ghana, use mobile money and how they perceive Ghana's Electronic Transfer Levy (E-levy), introduced in May 2022. This provides a particularly interesting case study to explore the equity implications of the tax, as the policy was explicitly justified as a way of taxing the informal economy but also includes measures to limit the tax burden on lower-income groups.

Methods and approach

The article uses data from a survey of 2,700 self-employed informal workers in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly to capture citizen perceptions of the policy and to examine the likely impact of the E-levy on informal workers with reference to equity.

Findings

Overall, our results suggest that the E-levy is highly regressive. Further, we show that most informal workers disapprove of the E-levy, reflecting not just concerns about its equity impacts, but also disappointment with the government's performance.

Policy implications

Our findings suggest that taxes on digital financial services should be reconsidered from an equity perspective. While some policy measures, including those undertaken in Ghana, can protect low-income earners, they are often insufficient to counteract overall regressive impacts. Where they are implemented, social spending from the revenue from these taxes should target low-income populations in the informal economy, while governments should focus on building trust among informal workers with regard to revenue raising and spending.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信