将亲社会行为重新视为跨社会行为:文献综述与新视角

Aparna A. Labroo, Uzma Khan, Sarena J. Su
{"title":"将亲社会行为重新视为跨社会行为:文献综述与新视角","authors":"Aparna A. Labroo,&nbsp;Uzma Khan,&nbsp;Sarena J. Su","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research questions in the prosocial behavior literature focus on the <i>pro</i> aspect of prosocial behavior—that is, how to motivate actions that benefit others. These questions typically employ simplified decision contexts that neglect the <i>intersocial</i> aspect of prosocial behavior—that is, people are embedded in social networks and impacted by interactivity among two or more persons, entities, or societies. These intersocial influences have increased with technology access. Consumers now face richer choice tradeoffs, can access more information on causes, observe others' actions, and choose to make their own choices public. To ask questions that address the nature of prosocial behavior itself rather than consider it merely as another decision context to motivate human behavior in, we call for researchers to conceptualize prosocial behavior as <i>intersocial</i>. This approach can help capture the more realistic decision tradeoffs consumers face, as well as illuminate new research opportunities arising from considering technology-enabled giving and socially hyperconnected consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":100328,"journal":{"name":"Consumer Psychology Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"92-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arcp.1088","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering prosocial behavior as intersocial: A literature review and a new perspective\",\"authors\":\"Aparna A. Labroo,&nbsp;Uzma Khan,&nbsp;Sarena J. Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/arcp.1088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Research questions in the prosocial behavior literature focus on the <i>pro</i> aspect of prosocial behavior—that is, how to motivate actions that benefit others. These questions typically employ simplified decision contexts that neglect the <i>intersocial</i> aspect of prosocial behavior—that is, people are embedded in social networks and impacted by interactivity among two or more persons, entities, or societies. These intersocial influences have increased with technology access. Consumers now face richer choice tradeoffs, can access more information on causes, observe others' actions, and choose to make their own choices public. To ask questions that address the nature of prosocial behavior itself rather than consider it merely as another decision context to motivate human behavior in, we call for researchers to conceptualize prosocial behavior as <i>intersocial</i>. This approach can help capture the more realistic decision tradeoffs consumers face, as well as illuminate new research opportunities arising from considering technology-enabled giving and socially hyperconnected consumers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consumer Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"92-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arcp.1088\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consumer Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arcp.1088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumer Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arcp.1088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

亲社会行为文献中的研究问题集中在亲社会行为的亲方面,即如何激励有利于他人的行为。这些问题通常采用简化的决策上下文,忽略了亲社会行为的社会间方面——也就是说,人们嵌入社交网络,并受到两个或多个个人、实体或社会之间互动的影响。这些社会间的影响随着技术的普及而增加。消费者现在面临着更丰富的选择权衡,可以获得更多关于原因的信息,观察他人的行为,并选择公开自己的选择。为了提出涉及亲社会行为本身性质的问题,而不是仅仅将其视为激励人类行为的另一个决策背景,我们呼吁研究人员将亲社会行为概念化为跨社会行为。这种方法可以帮助捕捉消费者面临的更现实的决策权衡,并阐明考虑技术支持的给予和社会超级连接的消费者所带来的新的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reconsidering prosocial behavior as intersocial: A literature review and a new perspective

Reconsidering prosocial behavior as intersocial: A literature review and a new perspective

Research questions in the prosocial behavior literature focus on the pro aspect of prosocial behavior—that is, how to motivate actions that benefit others. These questions typically employ simplified decision contexts that neglect the intersocial aspect of prosocial behavior—that is, people are embedded in social networks and impacted by interactivity among two or more persons, entities, or societies. These intersocial influences have increased with technology access. Consumers now face richer choice tradeoffs, can access more information on causes, observe others' actions, and choose to make their own choices public. To ask questions that address the nature of prosocial behavior itself rather than consider it merely as another decision context to motivate human behavior in, we call for researchers to conceptualize prosocial behavior as intersocial. This approach can help capture the more realistic decision tradeoffs consumers face, as well as illuminate new research opportunities arising from considering technology-enabled giving and socially hyperconnected consumers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信