与土地管理实践相比,寄主选择对叶片微生物组组装的影响更强

Pankaj K. Singh, Eleonora Egidi, Catriona A. Macdonald, Brajesh K. Singh
{"title":"与土地管理实践相比,寄主选择对叶片微生物组组装的影响更强","authors":"Pankaj K. Singh,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi,&nbsp;Catriona A. Macdonald,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Singh","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Plant microbiomes contribute directly to plant health and productivity, but mechanisms that underpin plant microbiome assembly in different compartments (e.g., root, leaf) are not fully understood. Identifying environmental and management factors that affect plant microbiome assembly is important to advance understanding of fundamental ecological processes, and to harness microbiome for improved primary productivity and environmental sustainability. Irrigation and fertilization are two common management practices in Australian tree plantations, but little is known about the effects of these treatments on soil, plant host and their microbiome. Here, we investigated the impact of decade-long irrigation, fertilization and their combined application on soil, plant traits and microbiome of a <i>Eucalyptus saligna</i> plantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Microbial profiling of bulk soil, rhizosphere, root and leaves was performed using amplicon sequencing 16S ribosomal DNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) markers for bacteria and fungi, respectively, along with measurements of soil properties and plant traits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results indicated that both management practices significantly affected soil properties and soil and root microbiomes. Irrigation increased but fertilizer treatment reduced microbial alpha diversity. However, neither irrigation nor fertilizer treatment impacted the leaf microbiome. Our findings suggest that management practices impact soil edaphic factors, which in turn influence the below-ground microbiome (soil and root), but the leaf microbiome remains unaffected. In addition, the leaf microbiome was distinct from soil and root microbiomes, and a source tracker analysis suggested that root and bulk soils only contributed to 53% and 10% operational taxonomic units of the leaf bacterial community, suggesting strong and sequential host selection of the leaf microbiome. In addition, management practices had a limited impact on leaf traits and, consequently, the leaf microbiome maintained its distinct composition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings provide mechanistic evidence for ecological processes that drive plant microbiome assembly and indicate that host selection plays a more important role than management practices in the leaf microbiome assembly.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Host selection has a stronger impact on leaf microbiome assembly compared to land-management practices\",\"authors\":\"Pankaj K. Singh,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi,&nbsp;Catriona A. Macdonald,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sae2.12043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plant microbiomes contribute directly to plant health and productivity, but mechanisms that underpin plant microbiome assembly in different compartments (e.g., root, leaf) are not fully understood. Identifying environmental and management factors that affect plant microbiome assembly is important to advance understanding of fundamental ecological processes, and to harness microbiome for improved primary productivity and environmental sustainability. Irrigation and fertilization are two common management practices in Australian tree plantations, but little is known about the effects of these treatments on soil, plant host and their microbiome. Here, we investigated the impact of decade-long irrigation, fertilization and their combined application on soil, plant traits and microbiome of a <i>Eucalyptus saligna</i> plantation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Microbial profiling of bulk soil, rhizosphere, root and leaves was performed using amplicon sequencing 16S ribosomal DNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) markers for bacteria and fungi, respectively, along with measurements of soil properties and plant traits.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results indicated that both management practices significantly affected soil properties and soil and root microbiomes. Irrigation increased but fertilizer treatment reduced microbial alpha diversity. However, neither irrigation nor fertilizer treatment impacted the leaf microbiome. Our findings suggest that management practices impact soil edaphic factors, which in turn influence the below-ground microbiome (soil and root), but the leaf microbiome remains unaffected. In addition, the leaf microbiome was distinct from soil and root microbiomes, and a source tracker analysis suggested that root and bulk soils only contributed to 53% and 10% operational taxonomic units of the leaf bacterial community, suggesting strong and sequential host selection of the leaf microbiome. In addition, management practices had a limited impact on leaf traits and, consequently, the leaf microbiome maintained its distinct composition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings provide mechanistic evidence for ecological processes that drive plant microbiome assembly and indicate that host selection plays a more important role than management practices in the leaf microbiome assembly.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12043\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言植物微生物组直接有助于植物健康和生产力,但支撑植物微生物组在不同隔间(如根、叶)中组装的机制尚不完全清楚。识别影响植物微生物组组装的环境和管理因素对于促进对基本生态过程的理解,以及利用微生物组提高初级生产力和环境可持续性至关重要。灌溉和施肥是澳大利亚植树造林中两种常见的管理方法,但对这些处理对土壤、植物宿主及其微生物组的影响知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了长达十年的灌溉、施肥及其联合应用对桉树人工林土壤、植物性状和微生物组的影响。材料和方法分别使用细菌和真菌的16S核糖体DNA扩增子测序和内部转录间隔区(ITS)标记,以及土壤性质和植物性状的测量,对大块土壤、根际、根和叶片进行微生物特征分析。结果两种管理方式对土壤性质、土壤和根系微生物群均有显著影响。灌溉增加,但肥料处理降低了微生物α多样性。然而,无论是灌溉还是施肥都不会影响叶片微生物组。我们的研究结果表明,管理实践会影响土壤土壤因素,而土壤土壤因素又会影响地下微生物组(土壤和根系),但叶片微生物组仍然不受影响。此外,叶片微生物组与土壤和根系微生物组不同,来源追踪分析表明,根系和大块土壤仅占叶片细菌群落的53%和10%的操作分类单位,这表明叶片微生物组的宿主选择是强有力的、连续的。此外,管理实践对叶片性状的影响有限,因此,叶片微生物组保持了其独特的组成。结论这些发现为驱动植物微生物组组装的生态过程提供了机制证据,并表明寄主选择在叶片微生物组组装中比管理实践发挥着更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Host selection has a stronger impact on leaf microbiome assembly compared to land-management practices

Host selection has a stronger impact on leaf microbiome assembly compared to land-management practices

Introduction

Plant microbiomes contribute directly to plant health and productivity, but mechanisms that underpin plant microbiome assembly in different compartments (e.g., root, leaf) are not fully understood. Identifying environmental and management factors that affect plant microbiome assembly is important to advance understanding of fundamental ecological processes, and to harness microbiome for improved primary productivity and environmental sustainability. Irrigation and fertilization are two common management practices in Australian tree plantations, but little is known about the effects of these treatments on soil, plant host and their microbiome. Here, we investigated the impact of decade-long irrigation, fertilization and their combined application on soil, plant traits and microbiome of a Eucalyptus saligna plantation.

Materials and Methods

Microbial profiling of bulk soil, rhizosphere, root and leaves was performed using amplicon sequencing 16S ribosomal DNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) markers for bacteria and fungi, respectively, along with measurements of soil properties and plant traits.

Results

The results indicated that both management practices significantly affected soil properties and soil and root microbiomes. Irrigation increased but fertilizer treatment reduced microbial alpha diversity. However, neither irrigation nor fertilizer treatment impacted the leaf microbiome. Our findings suggest that management practices impact soil edaphic factors, which in turn influence the below-ground microbiome (soil and root), but the leaf microbiome remains unaffected. In addition, the leaf microbiome was distinct from soil and root microbiomes, and a source tracker analysis suggested that root and bulk soils only contributed to 53% and 10% operational taxonomic units of the leaf bacterial community, suggesting strong and sequential host selection of the leaf microbiome. In addition, management practices had a limited impact on leaf traits and, consequently, the leaf microbiome maintained its distinct composition.

Conclusion

These findings provide mechanistic evidence for ecological processes that drive plant microbiome assembly and indicate that host selection plays a more important role than management practices in the leaf microbiome assembly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信