采用“想象的未来世代”设计可持续发展的研究战略和技术创新——以冶金为例

Keishiro Hara, Iori Miura, Masanori Suzuki, Toshihiro Tanaka
{"title":"采用“想象的未来世代”设计可持续发展的研究战略和技术创新——以冶金为例","authors":"Keishiro Hara,&nbsp;Iori Miura,&nbsp;Masanori Suzuki,&nbsp;Toshihiro Tanaka","doi":"10.1002/ffo2.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To mobilize science and technology for sustainability, it is essential to develop a method for explicitly considering the needs and preferences of future generations in designing research strategies and technology innovations. In this study, we conducted a participatory deliberation experiment on research strategy design of hydrothermal reactions and slag, to analyze whether the adoption of imaginary future generations (IFGs), which is a social system that has been proven to be effective for overcoming shortsightedness and activating futurability of people and society in pursuit of sustainability, could change the direction of research and development (R&amp;D) and thereby innovation. A questionnaire survey was administered to the participants after each deliberation session to verify whether treatments, such as analyzing past R&amp;D initiatives and adopting IFGs in deliberations, would change participants’ perceptions about criteria related to designing R&amp;D programs. The results of the deliberation experiment showed that the contents and ideas of research strategies, such as research visions, methodologies and anticipated benefits, were changed by the adoption of IFGs. The criteria used for designing R&amp;D also altered according to changes in research strategy. The findings showed that adopting IFGs and examining issues from the viewpoint of “futurability” could shift the direction of research agendas and technological innovation. Furthermore, the findings could provide insights into how to design R&amp;D strategies and generate innovations in pursuit of sustainability by reflecting upon the needs of and benefits to future generations.</p>","PeriodicalId":100567,"journal":{"name":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","volume":"5 3-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ffo2.163","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing research strategy and technology innovation for sustainability by adopting “imaginary future generations”—A case study using metallurgy\",\"authors\":\"Keishiro Hara,&nbsp;Iori Miura,&nbsp;Masanori Suzuki,&nbsp;Toshihiro Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ffo2.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To mobilize science and technology for sustainability, it is essential to develop a method for explicitly considering the needs and preferences of future generations in designing research strategies and technology innovations. In this study, we conducted a participatory deliberation experiment on research strategy design of hydrothermal reactions and slag, to analyze whether the adoption of imaginary future generations (IFGs), which is a social system that has been proven to be effective for overcoming shortsightedness and activating futurability of people and society in pursuit of sustainability, could change the direction of research and development (R&amp;D) and thereby innovation. A questionnaire survey was administered to the participants after each deliberation session to verify whether treatments, such as analyzing past R&amp;D initiatives and adopting IFGs in deliberations, would change participants’ perceptions about criteria related to designing R&amp;D programs. The results of the deliberation experiment showed that the contents and ideas of research strategies, such as research visions, methodologies and anticipated benefits, were changed by the adoption of IFGs. The criteria used for designing R&amp;D also altered according to changes in research strategy. The findings showed that adopting IFGs and examining issues from the viewpoint of “futurability” could shift the direction of research agendas and technological innovation. Furthermore, the findings could provide insights into how to design R&amp;D strategies and generate innovations in pursuit of sustainability by reflecting upon the needs of and benefits to future generations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"5 3-4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ffo2.163\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了调动科学和技术促进可持续性,必须制定一种方法,在设计研究战略和技术创新时明确考虑后代的需求和偏好。在这项研究中,我们对水热反应和矿渣的研究策略设计进行了参与式审议实验,以分析采用想象的后代(IFG),这是一种已被证明有效克服短视并激活人们和社会追求可持续性的未来性的社会制度,可以改变研发方向,从而进行创新。在每次审议会议后对参与者进行问卷调查,以验证治疗(如分析过去的R&;D倡议和在审议中采用IFG,将改变参与者对设计R&;D程序。审议实验结果表明,IFG的采用改变了研究策略的内容和思路,如研究愿景、方法论和预期效益。设计R&;D也随着研究策略的变化而变化。研究结果表明,采用IFG并从“未来性”的角度审视问题可以改变研究议程和技术创新的方向。此外,这些发现可以为如何设计R&;D战略,并通过反思子孙后代的需求和利益,产生创新,以追求可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Designing research strategy and technology innovation for sustainability by adopting “imaginary future generations”—A case study using metallurgy

Designing research strategy and technology innovation for sustainability by adopting “imaginary future generations”—A case study using metallurgy

To mobilize science and technology for sustainability, it is essential to develop a method for explicitly considering the needs and preferences of future generations in designing research strategies and technology innovations. In this study, we conducted a participatory deliberation experiment on research strategy design of hydrothermal reactions and slag, to analyze whether the adoption of imaginary future generations (IFGs), which is a social system that has been proven to be effective for overcoming shortsightedness and activating futurability of people and society in pursuit of sustainability, could change the direction of research and development (R&D) and thereby innovation. A questionnaire survey was administered to the participants after each deliberation session to verify whether treatments, such as analyzing past R&D initiatives and adopting IFGs in deliberations, would change participants’ perceptions about criteria related to designing R&D programs. The results of the deliberation experiment showed that the contents and ideas of research strategies, such as research visions, methodologies and anticipated benefits, were changed by the adoption of IFGs. The criteria used for designing R&D also altered according to changes in research strategy. The findings showed that adopting IFGs and examining issues from the viewpoint of “futurability” could shift the direction of research agendas and technological innovation. Furthermore, the findings could provide insights into how to design R&D strategies and generate innovations in pursuit of sustainability by reflecting upon the needs of and benefits to future generations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信