节能大型公共建筑的空气质量和热舒适性管理

Pradnya Gaonkar, Amudheesan Nakkeeran, Jyotsna Bapat, Debabrata Das
{"title":"节能大型公共建筑的空气质量和热舒适性管理","authors":"Pradnya Gaonkar,&nbsp;Amudheesan Nakkeeran,&nbsp;Jyotsna Bapat,&nbsp;Debabrata Das","doi":"10.1007/s44150-022-00059-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maximizing indoor comfort while minimizing energy costs has been a challenging problem for building management systems. This problem is significantly exacerbated for large public buildings with varying occupancy levels. A practical approach to measure occupants’ comfort has been to evaluate the indoor thermal comfort using Fanger’s Predictive Mean Vote (PMV) model, parameterized by the ambient temperature and Relative Humidity (RH). Such an approach is, however, one dimensional and does not consider other possible sources of discomfort like indoor air quality. Interestingly, the ambient temperature and RH, in addition to thermal comfort, also influence the amount of emissions from indoor furnishings, which is a prime source of indoor air quality degradation. Taking this into account, in this paper, we adapt the definition of comfort to include indoor air quality as well. Since occupancy levels, occupants’ activities and outdoor temperature vary with time, one way to achieve desired comfort goals is to continuously adapt the settings of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units in buildings. Such a continuous adaptation results in significant energy costs, especially in geographical locations where outdoor temperatures can be significantly higher/lower than desired indoor temperatures. In this context, we propose a location-aware multi-objective optimization model for indoor comfort and energy cost management. We combine conflicting objectives—improving air quality and thermal comforts, and minimizing energy cost—to determine cost-driven, comfort-driven and Pareto optimal solutions using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA). The proposed model is envisioned to enable building operators to determine suitable temperature and RH as per occupants’ requirement. The solution can be personalized based on the building structure and macro- and micro-location parameters. To ease configuration and customization of our model based on building- and geography-specific settings, we also present a MATLAB-based GUI that operators can leverage to understand the comfort-cost trade-off for buildings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"3 1","pages":"25 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air quality and thermal comfort management for energy-efficient large public buildings\",\"authors\":\"Pradnya Gaonkar,&nbsp;Amudheesan Nakkeeran,&nbsp;Jyotsna Bapat,&nbsp;Debabrata Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44150-022-00059-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Maximizing indoor comfort while minimizing energy costs has been a challenging problem for building management systems. This problem is significantly exacerbated for large public buildings with varying occupancy levels. A practical approach to measure occupants’ comfort has been to evaluate the indoor thermal comfort using Fanger’s Predictive Mean Vote (PMV) model, parameterized by the ambient temperature and Relative Humidity (RH). Such an approach is, however, one dimensional and does not consider other possible sources of discomfort like indoor air quality. Interestingly, the ambient temperature and RH, in addition to thermal comfort, also influence the amount of emissions from indoor furnishings, which is a prime source of indoor air quality degradation. Taking this into account, in this paper, we adapt the definition of comfort to include indoor air quality as well. Since occupancy levels, occupants’ activities and outdoor temperature vary with time, one way to achieve desired comfort goals is to continuously adapt the settings of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units in buildings. Such a continuous adaptation results in significant energy costs, especially in geographical locations where outdoor temperatures can be significantly higher/lower than desired indoor temperatures. In this context, we propose a location-aware multi-objective optimization model for indoor comfort and energy cost management. We combine conflicting objectives—improving air quality and thermal comforts, and minimizing energy cost—to determine cost-driven, comfort-driven and Pareto optimal solutions using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA). The proposed model is envisioned to enable building operators to determine suitable temperature and RH as per occupants’ requirement. The solution can be personalized based on the building structure and macro- and micro-location parameters. To ease configuration and customization of our model based on building- and geography-specific settings, we also present a MATLAB-based GUI that operators can leverage to understand the comfort-cost trade-off for buildings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-022-00059-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-022-00059-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最大限度地提高室内舒适度,同时最大限度地降低能源成本,一直是建筑管理系统面临的一个具有挑战性的问题。对于入住率不同的大型公共建筑来说,这一问题更加严重。测量居住者舒适度的一种实用方法是使用Fanger的预测平均投票(PMV)模型来评估室内热舒适度,该模型由环境温度和相对湿度(RH)参数化。然而,这种方法是一维的,没有考虑其他可能的不适来源,如室内空气质量。有趣的是,除了热舒适性外,环境温度和相对湿度也会影响室内家具的排放量,这是室内空气质量下降的主要来源。考虑到这一点,在本文中,我们调整了舒适度的定义,将室内空气质量也包括在内。由于入住率、入住者的活动和室外温度随时间而变化,实现所需舒适度目标的一种方法是不断调整建筑物中供暖、通风和空调(HVAC)装置的设置。这种连续的适应导致显著的能源成本,特别是在室外温度可能显著高于/低于期望的室内温度的地理位置。在此背景下,我们提出了一个用于室内舒适度和能源成本管理的位置感知多目标优化模型。我们将相互冲突的目标——改善空气质量和热舒适性,以及最大限度地降低能源成本——结合起来,使用多目标遗传算法(MOGA)来确定成本驱动、舒适驱动和帕累托最优解决方案。所提出的模型旨在使建筑运营商能够根据居住者的要求确定合适的温度和相对湿度。该解决方案可以根据建筑结构以及宏观和微观位置参数进行个性化设置。为了简化基于建筑和地理特定设置的模型配置和定制,我们还提供了一个基于MATLAB的GUI,操作员可以利用它来了解建筑的舒适性成本权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Air quality and thermal comfort management for energy-efficient large public buildings

Maximizing indoor comfort while minimizing energy costs has been a challenging problem for building management systems. This problem is significantly exacerbated for large public buildings with varying occupancy levels. A practical approach to measure occupants’ comfort has been to evaluate the indoor thermal comfort using Fanger’s Predictive Mean Vote (PMV) model, parameterized by the ambient temperature and Relative Humidity (RH). Such an approach is, however, one dimensional and does not consider other possible sources of discomfort like indoor air quality. Interestingly, the ambient temperature and RH, in addition to thermal comfort, also influence the amount of emissions from indoor furnishings, which is a prime source of indoor air quality degradation. Taking this into account, in this paper, we adapt the definition of comfort to include indoor air quality as well. Since occupancy levels, occupants’ activities and outdoor temperature vary with time, one way to achieve desired comfort goals is to continuously adapt the settings of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units in buildings. Such a continuous adaptation results in significant energy costs, especially in geographical locations where outdoor temperatures can be significantly higher/lower than desired indoor temperatures. In this context, we propose a location-aware multi-objective optimization model for indoor comfort and energy cost management. We combine conflicting objectives—improving air quality and thermal comforts, and minimizing energy cost—to determine cost-driven, comfort-driven and Pareto optimal solutions using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA). The proposed model is envisioned to enable building operators to determine suitable temperature and RH as per occupants’ requirement. The solution can be personalized based on the building structure and macro- and micro-location parameters. To ease configuration and customization of our model based on building- and geography-specific settings, we also present a MATLAB-based GUI that operators can leverage to understand the comfort-cost trade-off for buildings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信