多酚类化合物的分类及抗氧化研究进展

IF 5.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yuxi Lang , Ningxuan Gao , Zhihuan Zang , Xianjun Meng , Yang Lin , Shufang Yang , Yiyun Yang , Zhufeng Jin , Bin Li
{"title":"多酚类化合物的分类及抗氧化研究进展","authors":"Yuxi Lang ,&nbsp;Ningxuan Gao ,&nbsp;Zhihuan Zang ,&nbsp;Xianjun Meng ,&nbsp;Yang Lin ,&nbsp;Shufang Yang ,&nbsp;Yiyun Yang ,&nbsp;Zhufeng Jin ,&nbsp;Bin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polyphenols are widely recognized as the effective antioxidants, which are divided into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans, tannins and so on. They could regulate internal functions and protect the body from diseases related to oxidative damage. Due to the fact that their antioxidant capacity is influenced by the structure, stability and bioavailability, the detection of their bioactivity should be considered comprehensively. Currently, the methods for measuring the antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds are divided into chemical, cell-based and <em>in vivo</em> assays. The chemical assays include 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric reducing /antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), peroxyl radical scavenging capacity (PSC), which are rapid identification method, but their reaction mechanism has a great gap with the internal body response. The cell-based assays are more consistent with biological reaction, but still do not take the bioavailability into consideration. The <em>in vivo</em> assays, which commonly utilized <em>Caenorhabditis elegans</em> or rats as models, are more representative, but these methods are more complex and spend longer. This review summarizes the antioxidant evaluation methods of phenolic compounds and discusses their advantages and limitations comparatively, which could help discriminate and select the appropriate assay in the actual operation, and facilitate the development of comprehensive approaches as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Future Foods","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 193-204"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review\",\"authors\":\"Yuxi Lang ,&nbsp;Ningxuan Gao ,&nbsp;Zhihuan Zang ,&nbsp;Xianjun Meng ,&nbsp;Yang Lin ,&nbsp;Shufang Yang ,&nbsp;Yiyun Yang ,&nbsp;Zhufeng Jin ,&nbsp;Bin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Polyphenols are widely recognized as the effective antioxidants, which are divided into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans, tannins and so on. They could regulate internal functions and protect the body from diseases related to oxidative damage. Due to the fact that their antioxidant capacity is influenced by the structure, stability and bioavailability, the detection of their bioactivity should be considered comprehensively. Currently, the methods for measuring the antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds are divided into chemical, cell-based and <em>in vivo</em> assays. The chemical assays include 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric reducing /antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), peroxyl radical scavenging capacity (PSC), which are rapid identification method, but their reaction mechanism has a great gap with the internal body response. The cell-based assays are more consistent with biological reaction, but still do not take the bioavailability into consideration. The <em>in vivo</em> assays, which commonly utilized <em>Caenorhabditis elegans</em> or rats as models, are more representative, but these methods are more complex and spend longer. This review summarizes the antioxidant evaluation methods of phenolic compounds and discusses their advantages and limitations comparatively, which could help discriminate and select the appropriate assay in the actual operation, and facilitate the development of comprehensive approaches as well.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Future Foods\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 193-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Future Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772566923000605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772566923000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多酚类物质是公认的有效抗氧化剂,分为黄酮类、酚酸类、二苯乙烯类、木脂素类、单宁类等。它们可以调节内部功能,保护身体免受与氧化损伤有关的疾病。由于其抗氧化能力受其结构、稳定性和生物利用度的影响,因此对其生物活性的检测应综合考虑。目前,测定酚类化合物抗氧化能力的方法分为化学法、细胞法和体内法。化学检测方法包括2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶肼(DPPH)、2,2 ' -氮唑-(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸)(ABTS)、铁还原/抗氧化能力(FRAP)、氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)、过氧自由基清除能力(PSC)等,均为快速鉴定方法,但其反应机理与体内反应存在较大差距。基于细胞的测定更符合生物反应,但仍未考虑生物利用度。通常以秀丽隐杆线虫或大鼠为模型的体内实验更具代表性,但这些方法较为复杂,耗时较长。本文对酚类化合物抗氧化评价方法进行了综述,并对其优缺点进行了比较讨论,有助于在实际操作中区分和选择合适的检测方法,也有利于综合评价方法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review

Polyphenols are widely recognized as the effective antioxidants, which are divided into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans, tannins and so on. They could regulate internal functions and protect the body from diseases related to oxidative damage. Due to the fact that their antioxidant capacity is influenced by the structure, stability and bioavailability, the detection of their bioactivity should be considered comprehensively. Currently, the methods for measuring the antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds are divided into chemical, cell-based and in vivo assays. The chemical assays include 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric reducing /antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), peroxyl radical scavenging capacity (PSC), which are rapid identification method, but their reaction mechanism has a great gap with the internal body response. The cell-based assays are more consistent with biological reaction, but still do not take the bioavailability into consideration. The in vivo assays, which commonly utilized Caenorhabditis elegans or rats as models, are more representative, but these methods are more complex and spend longer. This review summarizes the antioxidant evaluation methods of phenolic compounds and discusses their advantages and limitations comparatively, which could help discriminate and select the appropriate assay in the actual operation, and facilitate the development of comprehensive approaches as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信