在半月板修复中的应用:目前的概念和未来的展望

Kazunori Shimomura , George Jacob , Hiroto Hanai , Norimasa Nakamura
{"title":"在半月板修复中的应用:目前的概念和未来的展望","authors":"Kazunori Shimomura ,&nbsp;George Jacob ,&nbsp;Hiroto Hanai ,&nbsp;Norimasa Nakamura","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2022.100090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Meniscal tissue is a complex structure and performs a vital role in the normal biomechanical functioning of the knee joint. Unfortunately, meniscal tissue lacks vascularity and therefore demonstrates poor healing potential. To improve meniscal healing biological therapies have been used to enhance meniscal repairs and improve repair outcomes. Newer therapies incorporate growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to improve the probability of healing and patient treatment outcomes under the term orthobiologics.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To give a narrative review of orthobiologics utilized in meniscal repair therapies and determine their effectiveness and role in treating meniscal tears.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases in April 2021 without any date restrictions. Any relevant literature describing orthobiologic therapies utilized in meniscal repair was identified from the clinical databases and a narrative review was undertaken.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Currently, orthobiologics used in clinical settings are autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and MSC-based therapies. These demonstrate clinical benefit and enhanced meniscal repair. Standardizing PRP remains challenging and is essential to provide uniformity in treatment. Both therapies appear safe with no significant adverse effects, and MSC-based therapies do not show any increased risk of tumorgenicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Orthobiologics in meniscal tears have shown mild to moderate clinical benefit, as demonstrated in a small series of clinical studies. However, literature on clinical results is scarce, and preclinical data remains the justification for these therapies. Larger, well-designed trials will determine their true benefit, and combining them with tissue engineering techniques may improve results in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of orthobiologic augmentation for meniscal repairs: current concepts and future perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Kazunori Shimomura ,&nbsp;George Jacob ,&nbsp;Hiroto Hanai ,&nbsp;Norimasa Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjp.2022.100090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Meniscal tissue is a complex structure and performs a vital role in the normal biomechanical functioning of the knee joint. Unfortunately, meniscal tissue lacks vascularity and therefore demonstrates poor healing potential. To improve meniscal healing biological therapies have been used to enhance meniscal repairs and improve repair outcomes. Newer therapies incorporate growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to improve the probability of healing and patient treatment outcomes under the term orthobiologics.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To give a narrative review of orthobiologics utilized in meniscal repair therapies and determine their effectiveness and role in treating meniscal tears.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases in April 2021 without any date restrictions. Any relevant literature describing orthobiologic therapies utilized in meniscal repair was identified from the clinical databases and a narrative review was undertaken.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Currently, orthobiologics used in clinical settings are autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and MSC-based therapies. These demonstrate clinical benefit and enhanced meniscal repair. Standardizing PRP remains challenging and is essential to provide uniformity in treatment. Both therapies appear safe with no significant adverse effects, and MSC-based therapies do not show any increased risk of tumorgenicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Orthobiologics in meniscal tears have shown mild to moderate clinical benefit, as demonstrated in a small series of clinical studies. However, literature on clinical results is scarce, and preclinical data remains the justification for these therapies. Larger, well-designed trials will determine their true benefit, and combining them with tissue engineering techniques may improve results in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半月板组织是一种复杂的结构,在膝关节的正常生物力学功能中起着至关重要的作用。不幸的是,半月板组织缺乏血管,因此表现出较差的愈合潜力。为了改善半月板的愈合,生物疗法已被用于增强半月板修复并改善修复效果。较新的治疗方法结合了生长因子和间充质干细胞(MSC),以提高愈合的概率和患者治疗结果,称为“原生物制剂”。目的对半月板修复治疗中使用的矫形生物制剂进行叙述性综述,并确定其在治疗半月板撕裂中的有效性和作用。方法于2021年4月使用PubMed(MEDLINE)和EMBASE数据库进行文献检索,没有任何日期限制。从临床数据库中确定了任何描述半月板修复中使用的矫形生物学疗法的相关文献,并进行了叙述性综述。结果目前,临床上使用的原生物制剂是基于自体富血小板血浆(PRP)和MSC的疗法。这些证明了临床益处和半月板修复的增强。标准化PRP仍然具有挑战性,并且对于提供治疗的一致性至关重要。这两种疗法似乎都是安全的,没有显著的不良反应,并且基于MSC的疗法没有显示出任何增加的肿瘤发生风险。结论正如一系列小型临床研究所证明的那样,半月板撕裂的原位生物制剂具有轻度至中度的临床益处。然而,关于临床结果的文献很少,临床前数据仍然是这些疗法的理由。更大规模、精心设计的试验将决定其真正的益处,将其与组织工程技术相结合可能会在未来改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of orthobiologic augmentation for meniscal repairs: current concepts and future perspectives

Introduction

Meniscal tissue is a complex structure and performs a vital role in the normal biomechanical functioning of the knee joint. Unfortunately, meniscal tissue lacks vascularity and therefore demonstrates poor healing potential. To improve meniscal healing biological therapies have been used to enhance meniscal repairs and improve repair outcomes. Newer therapies incorporate growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to improve the probability of healing and patient treatment outcomes under the term orthobiologics.

Objective

To give a narrative review of orthobiologics utilized in meniscal repair therapies and determine their effectiveness and role in treating meniscal tears.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases in April 2021 without any date restrictions. Any relevant literature describing orthobiologic therapies utilized in meniscal repair was identified from the clinical databases and a narrative review was undertaken.

Results

Currently, orthobiologics used in clinical settings are autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and MSC-based therapies. These demonstrate clinical benefit and enhanced meniscal repair. Standardizing PRP remains challenging and is essential to provide uniformity in treatment. Both therapies appear safe with no significant adverse effects, and MSC-based therapies do not show any increased risk of tumorgenicity.

Conclusion

Orthobiologics in meniscal tears have shown mild to moderate clinical benefit, as demonstrated in a small series of clinical studies. However, literature on clinical results is scarce, and preclinical data remains the justification for these therapies. Larger, well-designed trials will determine their true benefit, and combining them with tissue engineering techniques may improve results in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信