健康人的滑车形态:对同种异体骨软骨移植的意义

Mitchell S. Mologne , Matthew T. Provencher , Annalise M. Peebles , Timothy S. Mologne
{"title":"健康人的滑车形态:对同种异体骨软骨移植的意义","authors":"Mitchell S. Mologne ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Provencher ,&nbsp;Annalise M. Peebles ,&nbsp;Timothy S. Mologne","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2022.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The unique anatomy of the trochlea makes osteochondral allograft (OCA) grafting of femoral trochlear lesions challenging but could be improved with better understanding of trochlear morphology.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess trochlear width, depth, and sulcus angle via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients without patellofemoral problems and determine whether bench measurements of donor femurs can better match donors and patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An analysis was performed on 209 deidentified MRIs (average age: 25.8 years, ages 12-57). Trochlear width and depth were measured 15 mm and 20 mm distal to the most proximal articular surface. MRIs were classified into groups based on trochlear depth (Group 1: 0-4.0 mm; Group 2: 4.1-6.0 mm; Group 3: &gt;6.0 mm). Difference in depth at the 2 distances was calculated. The same protocol was performed on 23 cadaveric knees.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean trochlear depths at 15 mm and 20 mm were significantly different between groups. Group 3 had significantly larger trochlear widths than Groups 1 and 2. All MRIs showed an increase in trochlear depth between 15 and 20 mm (mean increase: 1.31 ± 0.78 mm). There was no significant difference in trochlear depths between MRI and cadaveric groups. For MRI groups at 15 mm, the resultant apex decreased 10° between Groups 1 and 2 and 7.4° between Groups 2 and 3.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Assuming trochleae are perfect isosceles triangles, one can measure trochlear width and cartilage sulcus angle via MRI to assess trochlear depth. Consideration of trochlear depth and its distribution may enable more accurate matching of OCAs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trochlear morphology in healthy people: implications for osteochondral allograft transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell S. Mologne ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Provencher ,&nbsp;Annalise M. Peebles ,&nbsp;Timothy S. Mologne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjp.2022.100097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The unique anatomy of the trochlea makes osteochondral allograft (OCA) grafting of femoral trochlear lesions challenging but could be improved with better understanding of trochlear morphology.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess trochlear width, depth, and sulcus angle via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients without patellofemoral problems and determine whether bench measurements of donor femurs can better match donors and patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An analysis was performed on 209 deidentified MRIs (average age: 25.8 years, ages 12-57). Trochlear width and depth were measured 15 mm and 20 mm distal to the most proximal articular surface. MRIs were classified into groups based on trochlear depth (Group 1: 0-4.0 mm; Group 2: 4.1-6.0 mm; Group 3: &gt;6.0 mm). Difference in depth at the 2 distances was calculated. The same protocol was performed on 23 cadaveric knees.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean trochlear depths at 15 mm and 20 mm were significantly different between groups. Group 3 had significantly larger trochlear widths than Groups 1 and 2. All MRIs showed an increase in trochlear depth between 15 and 20 mm (mean increase: 1.31 ± 0.78 mm). There was no significant difference in trochlear depths between MRI and cadaveric groups. For MRI groups at 15 mm, the resultant apex decreased 10° between Groups 1 and 2 and 7.4° between Groups 2 and 3.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Assuming trochleae are perfect isosceles triangles, one can measure trochlear width and cartilage sulcus angle via MRI to assess trochlear depth. Consideration of trochlear depth and its distribution may enable more accurate matching of OCAs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑车独特的解剖结构使股骨滑车病变的骨软骨同种异体移植物(OCA)移植具有挑战性,但可以通过更好地了解滑车形态来改善。目的通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估没有髌股问题的患者的滑车宽度、深度和沟角,并确定供体股骨的台架测量是否能更好地匹配供体和患者。方法对209例已鉴定的MRI进行分析,平均年龄25.8岁,年龄12-57岁。在距离最近关节表面15 mm和20 mm处测量滑车宽度和深度。根据滑车深度将MRI分为组(第1组:0-4.0mm;第2组:4.1-6.0 mm;第3组:>;6.0mm)。计算两个距离处的深度差。同样的方案在23个尸体膝盖上进行。结果两组滑车平均深度分别为15 mm和20 mm,差异有统计学意义。第3组的滑车宽度明显大于第1组和第2组。所有核磁共振成像显示滑车深度在15至20 mm之间增加(平均增加:1.31±0.78 mm)。MRI组和尸体组的滑车深度没有显著差异。对于15 mm的MRI组,第1组和第2组之间的结果顶点减小了10°,第2组和第3组之间的顶点减小了7.4°。结论假设滑车是完美的等腰三角形,可以通过MRI测量滑车宽度和软骨沟角来评估滑车深度。考虑滑车深度及其分布可以实现OCA的更准确匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trochlear morphology in healthy people: implications for osteochondral allograft transplantation

Introduction

The unique anatomy of the trochlea makes osteochondral allograft (OCA) grafting of femoral trochlear lesions challenging but could be improved with better understanding of trochlear morphology.

Objectives

To assess trochlear width, depth, and sulcus angle via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients without patellofemoral problems and determine whether bench measurements of donor femurs can better match donors and patients.

Methods

An analysis was performed on 209 deidentified MRIs (average age: 25.8 years, ages 12-57). Trochlear width and depth were measured 15 mm and 20 mm distal to the most proximal articular surface. MRIs were classified into groups based on trochlear depth (Group 1: 0-4.0 mm; Group 2: 4.1-6.0 mm; Group 3: >6.0 mm). Difference in depth at the 2 distances was calculated. The same protocol was performed on 23 cadaveric knees.

Results

Mean trochlear depths at 15 mm and 20 mm were significantly different between groups. Group 3 had significantly larger trochlear widths than Groups 1 and 2. All MRIs showed an increase in trochlear depth between 15 and 20 mm (mean increase: 1.31 ± 0.78 mm). There was no significant difference in trochlear depths between MRI and cadaveric groups. For MRI groups at 15 mm, the resultant apex decreased 10° between Groups 1 and 2 and 7.4° between Groups 2 and 3.

Conclusions

Assuming trochleae are perfect isosceles triangles, one can measure trochlear width and cartilage sulcus angle via MRI to assess trochlear depth. Consideration of trochlear depth and its distribution may enable more accurate matching of OCAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信