eus引导下胆囊取石术的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析

Qian Yue , Changqing Zhong , Xin Huang , Qiang Cai , Lianyong Li
{"title":"eus引导下胆囊取石术的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Qian Yue ,&nbsp;Changqing Zhong ,&nbsp;Xin Huang ,&nbsp;Qiang Cai ,&nbsp;Lianyong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.gande.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The recurrence rate and readmission rate of patients with gallbladder stones and cholecystitis are high. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is a new method for the treatment of cholecystitis in patients with high surgical risk. The acute symptoms can be relieved by drainage of bile, and cholecystolithotomy or polyp resection can be performed through a stent or fistula.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This article introduced the technique of EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy and conducted a meta-analysis evaluating its feasibility and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four electronic databases including SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and PubMed were researched from inception to June 2022. Two researchers independently carried out literature screening and the data relevant to success rate and safety of per-oral cholecystoscopy were extracted for further meta-analysis by R Programming Language.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7 studies with 129 patients were included in the present analysis. The results showed that the technical success rate of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided cholecystolithotomy was 97% [95%CI (92%-99%)], the clinical success rate was 93% [95%CI (87%–96%)]. The total adverse event rates were 34% [95% CI (14%–63%)]. Subgroup analysis of four major individual adverse events was fever 11.91% [95% CI (2.05%–46.62%)], peritonitis 2.33% [95% CI (0.75%–6.96%)], bleeding 4.37% [95% CI (0.72%–22.34%)], and abdominal pain 0.91% [95% CI (0.02%–26.38%)]. The adverse events were mild and recovered after conservative treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy is a safe and alternative treatment modality for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, with acceptable procedure related complications. However, due to the limited data, further well-designed studies are warranted prior to confident adoption of the novel method into clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100571,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 125-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qian Yue ,&nbsp;Changqing Zhong ,&nbsp;Xin Huang ,&nbsp;Qiang Cai ,&nbsp;Lianyong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gande.2023.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The recurrence rate and readmission rate of patients with gallbladder stones and cholecystitis are high. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is a new method for the treatment of cholecystitis in patients with high surgical risk. The acute symptoms can be relieved by drainage of bile, and cholecystolithotomy or polyp resection can be performed through a stent or fistula.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This article introduced the technique of EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy and conducted a meta-analysis evaluating its feasibility and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four electronic databases including SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and PubMed were researched from inception to June 2022. Two researchers independently carried out literature screening and the data relevant to success rate and safety of per-oral cholecystoscopy were extracted for further meta-analysis by R Programming Language.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7 studies with 129 patients were included in the present analysis. The results showed that the technical success rate of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided cholecystolithotomy was 97% [95%CI (92%-99%)], the clinical success rate was 93% [95%CI (87%–96%)]. The total adverse event rates were 34% [95% CI (14%–63%)]. Subgroup analysis of four major individual adverse events was fever 11.91% [95% CI (2.05%–46.62%)], peritonitis 2.33% [95% CI (0.75%–6.96%)], bleeding 4.37% [95% CI (0.72%–22.34%)], and abdominal pain 0.91% [95% CI (0.02%–26.38%)]. The adverse events were mild and recovered after conservative treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy is a safe and alternative treatment modality for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, with acceptable procedure related complications. However, due to the limited data, further well-designed studies are warranted prior to confident adoption of the novel method into clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 125-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949752323000328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949752323000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胆囊结石和胆囊炎的复发率和再入院率较高。内镜超声引导胆囊引流术(EUS-GBD)是治疗手术高危患者胆囊炎的一种新方法。急性症状可以通过引流胆汁来缓解,胆囊结石切开术或息肉切除术可以通过支架或瘘管进行。目的本文介绍了EUS引导下胆囊结石切开术的技术,并对其可行性和安全性进行了荟萃分析。方法从成立到2022年6月,对SinoMed、CNKI、万方数据和PubMed四个电子数据库进行研究。两名研究人员独立进行了文献筛选,并提取了与每次口服胆囊镜检查的成功率和安全性相关的数据,用R编程语言进行进一步的荟萃分析。结果本分析共包括7项研究,涉及129名患者。结果显示,内镜超声引导胆囊结石切开术的技术成功率为97%[95%CI(92%-99%)],临床成功率为93%[95%Cl(87%-96%)]。总不良事件发生率为34%[95%CI(14%-63%)]。四个主要个体不良事件的亚组分析为:发烧11.91%[95%CI(2.05%-46.62%)]、腹膜炎2.33%[95%CI[0.75%-6.96%)]、出血4.37%[95%CI(0.72%-22.34%)]和腹痛0.91%[95%CI[0.02%-26.38%)]。不良事件较轻,经保守治疗后痊愈。结论EUS引导下胆囊结石切开术是治疗症状性胆囊结石的一种安全、可替代的治疗方式,并发症可接受。然而,由于数据有限,在有信心将新方法应用于临床实践之前,需要进行进一步精心设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy: A meta-analysis

Background

The recurrence rate and readmission rate of patients with gallbladder stones and cholecystitis are high. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is a new method for the treatment of cholecystitis in patients with high surgical risk. The acute symptoms can be relieved by drainage of bile, and cholecystolithotomy or polyp resection can be performed through a stent or fistula.

Aims

This article introduced the technique of EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy and conducted a meta-analysis evaluating its feasibility and safety.

Methods

Four electronic databases including SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and PubMed were researched from inception to June 2022. Two researchers independently carried out literature screening and the data relevant to success rate and safety of per-oral cholecystoscopy were extracted for further meta-analysis by R Programming Language.

Results

A total of 7 studies with 129 patients were included in the present analysis. The results showed that the technical success rate of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided cholecystolithotomy was 97% [95%CI (92%-99%)], the clinical success rate was 93% [95%CI (87%–96%)]. The total adverse event rates were 34% [95% CI (14%–63%)]. Subgroup analysis of four major individual adverse events was fever 11.91% [95% CI (2.05%–46.62%)], peritonitis 2.33% [95% CI (0.75%–6.96%)], bleeding 4.37% [95% CI (0.72%–22.34%)], and abdominal pain 0.91% [95% CI (0.02%–26.38%)]. The adverse events were mild and recovered after conservative treatment.

Conclusion

EUS-guided cholecystolithotomy is a safe and alternative treatment modality for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, with acceptable procedure related complications. However, due to the limited data, further well-designed studies are warranted prior to confident adoption of the novel method into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信