揭露性丑闻:结构性失败、道德规范和矛盾操纵之间的德国移植丑闻

Julia Rehsmann
{"title":"揭露性丑闻:结构性失败、道德规范和矛盾操纵之间的德国移植丑闻","authors":"Julia Rehsmann","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2023.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In 2012, the German transplant scandal was uncovered and reported in the national and international media. This article offers an anthropological analysis of the scandal and examines its ‘scandalous’ characteristics by taking a close look at its extraordinary and ordinary features.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The article is based on ethnographic research using multiple methods including participant observation, interviewing as well as media and document analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The transplant scandal in Germany revealed systemic ‘scandalous’ features of the national transplant system. From a significant lack of transparency in decision making, a weak legal framework for accountability, adherence to moralizing rules about alcohol and abstinence, to media coverage that individualized the scandal.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Looking at extraordinary events such as transplant scandals from an anthropological perspective offers an analysis that goes beyond the singular, scandalous event. An anthropological analysis allows to highlight the ordinary and ambivalent ‘scandalous’ features of transplant medicine It examines transplant medicine at the intersection of biomedicine, politics, and morality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A revealing scandal: The German transplant scandal between structural failures, moralizing rules, and ambivalent manipulations\",\"authors\":\"Julia Rehsmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.liver.2023.100168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In 2012, the German transplant scandal was uncovered and reported in the national and international media. This article offers an anthropological analysis of the scandal and examines its ‘scandalous’ characteristics by taking a close look at its extraordinary and ordinary features.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The article is based on ethnographic research using multiple methods including participant observation, interviewing as well as media and document analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The transplant scandal in Germany revealed systemic ‘scandalous’ features of the national transplant system. From a significant lack of transparency in decision making, a weak legal framework for accountability, adherence to moralizing rules about alcohol and abstinence, to media coverage that individualized the scandal.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Looking at extraordinary events such as transplant scandals from an anthropological perspective offers an analysis that goes beyond the singular, scandalous event. An anthropological analysis allows to highlight the ordinary and ambivalent ‘scandalous’ features of transplant medicine It examines transplant medicine at the intersection of biomedicine, politics, and morality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967623000302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967623000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2012年,德国的器官移植丑闻被国内和国际媒体曝光并报道。本文对这一丑闻进行了人类学分析,并通过对其非同寻常和普通特征的仔细观察来审视其“丑闻”特征。方法以民族志研究为基础,采用参与观察、访谈、媒体和文献分析等多种方法。结果德国的移植丑闻揭示了国家移植系统的系统性“丑闻”特征。从决策严重缺乏透明度,问责的法律框架薄弱,遵守关于酗酒和戒酒的道德规则,到媒体报道将丑闻个人化。从人类学的角度来看像移植丑闻这样的特殊事件,可以提供一种超越单一丑闻事件的分析。人类学分析可以突出移植医学的普通和矛盾的“丑闻”特征,它在生物医学,政治和道德的交叉点检查移植医学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A revealing scandal: The German transplant scandal between structural failures, moralizing rules, and ambivalent manipulations

Introduction

In 2012, the German transplant scandal was uncovered and reported in the national and international media. This article offers an anthropological analysis of the scandal and examines its ‘scandalous’ characteristics by taking a close look at its extraordinary and ordinary features.

Methods

The article is based on ethnographic research using multiple methods including participant observation, interviewing as well as media and document analysis.

Results

The transplant scandal in Germany revealed systemic ‘scandalous’ features of the national transplant system. From a significant lack of transparency in decision making, a weak legal framework for accountability, adherence to moralizing rules about alcohol and abstinence, to media coverage that individualized the scandal.

Conclusions

Looking at extraordinary events such as transplant scandals from an anthropological perspective offers an analysis that goes beyond the singular, scandalous event. An anthropological analysis allows to highlight the ordinary and ambivalent ‘scandalous’ features of transplant medicine It examines transplant medicine at the intersection of biomedicine, politics, and morality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信