重新引入受威胁的挖掘哺乳动物对土壤微生物群落的影响沿降雨梯度不同

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Orsi Decker , Eleonora Egidi , Anna J.M. Hopkins , Melissa Danks , Heloise Gibb
{"title":"重新引入受威胁的挖掘哺乳动物对土壤微生物群落的影响沿降雨梯度不同","authors":"Orsi Decker ,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi ,&nbsp;Anna J.M. Hopkins ,&nbsp;Melissa Danks ,&nbsp;Heloise Gibb","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecosystem engineers<span> influence co-existing species indirectly, through their modification of habitat conditions, so the loss of these species may have broad consequences for ecosystems globally. Digging mammals alter soil via soil turnover, habitat modification and mycophagy. However, we have a limited understanding of their impacts in different environments. In a continent-scale study spanning 3000 km across southern Australia, we asked whether reintroductions of native digging mammals affect soil microbial communities<span><span> in the soil matrix outside of their diggings, and if those impacts depend on the environmental context? We used high through-put sequencing analysis of bacterial and fungal environmental DNA to measure soil </span>microbial diversity<span> and community structure inside and outside digging mammal reintroduction areas at five reserves along a rainfall gradient from 166 to 877 mm per year, covering arid, semi-arid and temperate systems. Bacterial observed richness was not different inside and outside of the reserves; in contrast, fungal richness was higher in reserves, but only in arid and semi-arid environments. Fungal saprotrophs were more abundant in reserves: the mixing of soil layers mediated by digging mammals might therefore enhance decomposition. However, crust-forming microbes and ectomycorrhizal fungi were lower in abundance inside reserves, likely due to the disturbance and the altered soil nutrients that resulted from digging activity. Impacts of digging mammals varied among ecosystems which highlights the need for managers to consider the ecological context of reintroductions of ecosystem engineers when restoring for ecological functions.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 150889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reintroduction of threatened digging mammals influences soil microbial communities differently along a rainfall gradient\",\"authors\":\"Orsi Decker ,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi ,&nbsp;Anna J.M. Hopkins ,&nbsp;Melissa Danks ,&nbsp;Heloise Gibb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecosystem engineers<span> influence co-existing species indirectly, through their modification of habitat conditions, so the loss of these species may have broad consequences for ecosystems globally. Digging mammals alter soil via soil turnover, habitat modification and mycophagy. However, we have a limited understanding of their impacts in different environments. In a continent-scale study spanning 3000 km across southern Australia, we asked whether reintroductions of native digging mammals affect soil microbial communities<span><span> in the soil matrix outside of their diggings, and if those impacts depend on the environmental context? We used high through-put sequencing analysis of bacterial and fungal environmental DNA to measure soil </span>microbial diversity<span> and community structure inside and outside digging mammal reintroduction areas at five reserves along a rainfall gradient from 166 to 877 mm per year, covering arid, semi-arid and temperate systems. Bacterial observed richness was not different inside and outside of the reserves; in contrast, fungal richness was higher in reserves, but only in arid and semi-arid environments. Fungal saprotrophs were more abundant in reserves: the mixing of soil layers mediated by digging mammals might therefore enhance decomposition. However, crust-forming microbes and ectomycorrhizal fungi were lower in abundance inside reserves, likely due to the disturbance and the altered soil nutrients that resulted from digging activity. Impacts of digging mammals varied among ecosystems which highlights the need for managers to consider the ecological context of reintroductions of ecosystem engineers when restoring for ecological functions.</span></span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedobiologia\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 150889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003140562307957X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003140562307957X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态系统工程师通过改变栖息地条件间接影响共存物种,因此这些物种的消失可能对全球生态系统产生广泛的影响。挖掘哺乳动物通过土壤周转、栖息地改变和真菌吞噬来改变土壤。然而,我们对它们在不同环境中的影响了解有限。在一项横跨澳大利亚南部3000公里的大陆尺度研究中,我们提出了一个问题:重新引入本地挖掘哺乳动物是否会影响其挖掘之外土壤基质中的土壤微生物群落,以及这些影响是否取决于环境背景?利用细菌和真菌环境DNA的高通量测序分析方法,在166 ~ 877 mm /年的降雨量梯度下,对5个保护区的土壤微生物多样性和群落结构进行了研究,覆盖干旱、半干旱和温带系统。细菌丰富度在保护区内外无明显差异;相比之下,真菌丰富度在保护区中较高,但仅限于干旱和半干旱环境。真菌腐养菌的储量更丰富:由挖掘哺乳动物介导的土层混合可能因此加强分解。然而,在保护区中形成壳的微生物和外生菌根真菌的丰度较低,这可能是由于挖掘活动引起的干扰和土壤养分的改变。挖掘哺乳动物对生态系统的影响各不相同,这突出了管理者在恢复生态功能时考虑生态系统工程师重新引入的生态背景的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reintroduction of threatened digging mammals influences soil microbial communities differently along a rainfall gradient

Ecosystem engineers influence co-existing species indirectly, through their modification of habitat conditions, so the loss of these species may have broad consequences for ecosystems globally. Digging mammals alter soil via soil turnover, habitat modification and mycophagy. However, we have a limited understanding of their impacts in different environments. In a continent-scale study spanning 3000 km across southern Australia, we asked whether reintroductions of native digging mammals affect soil microbial communities in the soil matrix outside of their diggings, and if those impacts depend on the environmental context? We used high through-put sequencing analysis of bacterial and fungal environmental DNA to measure soil microbial diversity and community structure inside and outside digging mammal reintroduction areas at five reserves along a rainfall gradient from 166 to 877 mm per year, covering arid, semi-arid and temperate systems. Bacterial observed richness was not different inside and outside of the reserves; in contrast, fungal richness was higher in reserves, but only in arid and semi-arid environments. Fungal saprotrophs were more abundant in reserves: the mixing of soil layers mediated by digging mammals might therefore enhance decomposition. However, crust-forming microbes and ectomycorrhizal fungi were lower in abundance inside reserves, likely due to the disturbance and the altered soil nutrients that resulted from digging activity. Impacts of digging mammals varied among ecosystems which highlights the need for managers to consider the ecological context of reintroductions of ecosystem engineers when restoring for ecological functions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedobiologia
Pedobiologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments. Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions. We publish: original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects); descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research; innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信