一位实践者对Stephen Evans的“只是想给你们一点更新”的评论:内部人士对香港商业演讲的看法(2013)

IF 3.2 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Lisa K. Leopold
{"title":"一位实践者对Stephen Evans的“只是想给你们一点更新”的评论:内部人士对香港商业演讲的看法(2013)","authors":"Lisa K. Leopold","doi":"10.1016/j.esp.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Evans (2013)</span> analyzed the nature and frequency of Hong Kong professionals' workplace presentations as well as the challenges they faced when delivering these presentations. This commentary analyzes the pedagogical significance of <span>Evans’ (2013)</span> findings, recommends relevant classroom activities, and suggests directions for future research. Specifically, the commentary offers pedagogical activities to address each main challenge <span>Evans (2013)</span> identified from a robust needs analysis: “engaging the interest of the audience through the selection of relevant content, handling questions spontaneously and authoritatively, communicating in a natural spoken style, and integrating clearly designed slides into the flow of a presentation” (p. 205). As an initial step to narrowing the research-pedagogy gap which exists in business English, the commentary underscores the importance of a robust needs analysis which triangulates quantitative and qualitative data from multiple sources to identify learner needs. To address these needs, practitioners can implement research-informed activities using authentic materials. Since some of the challenges identified by <span>Evans (2013)</span> have been discussed in other studies about oral presentations and are likely shared by learners in other contexts, it is hoped that the pedagogical activities targeting these challenges offer practitioners new ways to help learners hone the skills needed to excel at workplace presentations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47809,"journal":{"name":"English for Specific Purposes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A practitioner’s commentary on Stephen Evans’ “Just wanna give you guys a bit of an update”: Insider perspectives on business presentations in Hong Kong (2013)\",\"authors\":\"Lisa K. Leopold\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esp.2023.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Evans (2013)</span> analyzed the nature and frequency of Hong Kong professionals' workplace presentations as well as the challenges they faced when delivering these presentations. This commentary analyzes the pedagogical significance of <span>Evans’ (2013)</span> findings, recommends relevant classroom activities, and suggests directions for future research. Specifically, the commentary offers pedagogical activities to address each main challenge <span>Evans (2013)</span> identified from a robust needs analysis: “engaging the interest of the audience through the selection of relevant content, handling questions spontaneously and authoritatively, communicating in a natural spoken style, and integrating clearly designed slides into the flow of a presentation” (p. 205). As an initial step to narrowing the research-pedagogy gap which exists in business English, the commentary underscores the importance of a robust needs analysis which triangulates quantitative and qualitative data from multiple sources to identify learner needs. To address these needs, practitioners can implement research-informed activities using authentic materials. Since some of the challenges identified by <span>Evans (2013)</span> have been discussed in other studies about oral presentations and are likely shared by learners in other contexts, it is hoped that the pedagogical activities targeting these challenges offer practitioners new ways to help learners hone the skills needed to excel at workplace presentations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English for Specific Purposes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English for Specific Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490623000261\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English for Specific Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490623000261","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Evans(2013)分析了香港专业人士职场演讲的性质和频率,以及他们在发表这些演讲时面临的挑战。这篇评论分析了Evans(2013)研究结果的教学意义,推荐了相关的课堂活动,并为未来的研究提出了方向。具体来说,评论提供了教学活动,以解决埃文斯(2013)从强有力的需求分析中确定的每个主要挑战:“通过选择相关内容吸引观众的兴趣,自发和权威地处理问题,以自然的口语方式沟通,并将清晰设计的幻灯片整合到演示流程中”(第205页)。作为缩小商务英语中存在的研究与教学差距的第一步,该评论强调了强大的需求分析的重要性,该分析对来自多个来源的定量和定性数据进行三角测量,以确定学习者的需求。为了满足这些需求,从业者可以使用真实的材料实施研究知情的活动。由于埃文斯(2013)指出的一些挑战已经在其他关于口头陈述的研究中讨论过,并且可能在其他情况下学习者也有同样的挑战,因此希望针对这些挑战的教学活动能为从业者提供新的方法,帮助学习者磨练在工作场所陈述中脱颖而出所需的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A practitioner’s commentary on Stephen Evans’ “Just wanna give you guys a bit of an update”: Insider perspectives on business presentations in Hong Kong (2013)

Evans (2013) analyzed the nature and frequency of Hong Kong professionals' workplace presentations as well as the challenges they faced when delivering these presentations. This commentary analyzes the pedagogical significance of Evans’ (2013) findings, recommends relevant classroom activities, and suggests directions for future research. Specifically, the commentary offers pedagogical activities to address each main challenge Evans (2013) identified from a robust needs analysis: “engaging the interest of the audience through the selection of relevant content, handling questions spontaneously and authoritatively, communicating in a natural spoken style, and integrating clearly designed slides into the flow of a presentation” (p. 205). As an initial step to narrowing the research-pedagogy gap which exists in business English, the commentary underscores the importance of a robust needs analysis which triangulates quantitative and qualitative data from multiple sources to identify learner needs. To address these needs, practitioners can implement research-informed activities using authentic materials. Since some of the challenges identified by Evans (2013) have been discussed in other studies about oral presentations and are likely shared by learners in other contexts, it is hoped that the pedagogical activities targeting these challenges offer practitioners new ways to help learners hone the skills needed to excel at workplace presentations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: English For Specific Purposes is an international peer-reviewed journal that welcomes submissions from across the world. Authors are encouraged to submit articles and research/discussion notes on topics relevant to the teaching and learning of discourse for specific communities: academic, occupational, or otherwise specialized. Topics such as the following may be treated from the perspective of English for specific purposes: second language acquisition in specialized contexts, needs assessment, curriculum development and evaluation, materials preparation, discourse analysis, descriptions of specialized varieties of English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信