Guolin C. Li , Hans Lambers , Stavros D. Veresoglou
{"title":"菌根生态学将受益于特定区域的假设","authors":"Guolin C. Li , Hans Lambers , Stavros D. Veresoglou","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Most arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi exhibit global distributions but have been studied mostly in a specific region of the globe, mainly covering temperate and boreal habitats, where nitrogen is the most common nutrient limiting primary productivity. Yet, it is relatively common to extrapolate our understanding of temperate and boreal systems to other regions of the globe. While the physiology of mycorrhizal associations is unlikely to differ worldwide, there are good chances that environmental settings interact with the way </span>mycorrhizas<span> function across ecoregions. Here, we first argue that mycorrhizal ecologists should develop region-specific hypotheses. We subsequently identify likely differences in how mycorrhizas function in subtropical regions compared with better-studied temperate and boreal areas. We finally use the subtropical region of China to develop five geographically-focused hypotheses, envisaging that they will trigger the interest of the scientific community worldwide in understudied regions into studying mycorrhizas through a new lens. Expanding the range of hypotheses in mycorrhizal ecology to describe understudied regions of the world, has the potential to confer multifaceted benefits to both science and society. We advocate to do so, and present a roadmap on how to develop such hypotheses.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 150908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mycorrhizal ecology would benefit from region-specific hypotheses\",\"authors\":\"Guolin C. Li , Hans Lambers , Stavros D. Veresoglou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Most arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi exhibit global distributions but have been studied mostly in a specific region of the globe, mainly covering temperate and boreal habitats, where nitrogen is the most common nutrient limiting primary productivity. Yet, it is relatively common to extrapolate our understanding of temperate and boreal systems to other regions of the globe. While the physiology of mycorrhizal associations is unlikely to differ worldwide, there are good chances that environmental settings interact with the way </span>mycorrhizas<span> function across ecoregions. Here, we first argue that mycorrhizal ecologists should develop region-specific hypotheses. We subsequently identify likely differences in how mycorrhizas function in subtropical regions compared with better-studied temperate and boreal areas. We finally use the subtropical region of China to develop five geographically-focused hypotheses, envisaging that they will trigger the interest of the scientific community worldwide in understudied regions into studying mycorrhizas through a new lens. Expanding the range of hypotheses in mycorrhizal ecology to describe understudied regions of the world, has the potential to confer multifaceted benefits to both science and society. We advocate to do so, and present a roadmap on how to develop such hypotheses.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedobiologia\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 150908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079763\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mycorrhizal ecology would benefit from region-specific hypotheses
Most arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi exhibit global distributions but have been studied mostly in a specific region of the globe, mainly covering temperate and boreal habitats, where nitrogen is the most common nutrient limiting primary productivity. Yet, it is relatively common to extrapolate our understanding of temperate and boreal systems to other regions of the globe. While the physiology of mycorrhizal associations is unlikely to differ worldwide, there are good chances that environmental settings interact with the way mycorrhizas function across ecoregions. Here, we first argue that mycorrhizal ecologists should develop region-specific hypotheses. We subsequently identify likely differences in how mycorrhizas function in subtropical regions compared with better-studied temperate and boreal areas. We finally use the subtropical region of China to develop five geographically-focused hypotheses, envisaging that they will trigger the interest of the scientific community worldwide in understudied regions into studying mycorrhizas through a new lens. Expanding the range of hypotheses in mycorrhizal ecology to describe understudied regions of the world, has the potential to confer multifaceted benefits to both science and society. We advocate to do so, and present a roadmap on how to develop such hypotheses.
期刊介绍:
Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments.
Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions.
We publish:
original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects);
descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research;
innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and
short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.