评论文章:“如果是ChatGPT写的呢?”从多学科角度探讨生成对话式人工智能对研究、实践和政策的机遇、挑战和影响

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Yogesh K. Dwivedi , Nir Kshetri , Laurie Hughes , Emma Louise Slade , Anand Jeyaraj , Arpan Kumar Kar , Abdullah M. Baabdullah , Alex Koohang , Vishnupriya Raghavan , Manju Ahuja , Hanaa Albanna , Mousa Ahmad Albashrawi , Adil S. Al-Busaidi , Janarthanan Balakrishnan , Yves Barlette , Sriparna Basu , Indranil Bose , Laurence Brooks , Dimitrios Buhalis , Lemuria Carter , Ryan Wright
{"title":"评论文章:“如果是ChatGPT写的呢?”从多学科角度探讨生成对话式人工智能对研究、实践和政策的机遇、挑战和影响","authors":"Yogesh K. Dwivedi ,&nbsp;Nir Kshetri ,&nbsp;Laurie Hughes ,&nbsp;Emma Louise Slade ,&nbsp;Anand Jeyaraj ,&nbsp;Arpan Kumar Kar ,&nbsp;Abdullah M. Baabdullah ,&nbsp;Alex Koohang ,&nbsp;Vishnupriya Raghavan ,&nbsp;Manju Ahuja ,&nbsp;Hanaa Albanna ,&nbsp;Mousa Ahmad Albashrawi ,&nbsp;Adil S. Al-Busaidi ,&nbsp;Janarthanan Balakrishnan ,&nbsp;Yves Barlette ,&nbsp;Sriparna Basu ,&nbsp;Indranil Bose ,&nbsp;Laurence Brooks ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Buhalis ,&nbsp;Lemuria Carter ,&nbsp;Ryan Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transformative artificially intelligent tools, such as ChatGPT, designed to generate sophisticated text indistinguishable from that produced by a human, are applicable across a wide range of contexts. The technology presents opportunities as well as, often ethical and legal, challenges, and has the potential for both positive and negative impacts for organisations, society, and individuals. Offering multi-disciplinary insight into some of these, this article brings together 43 contributions from experts in fields such as computer science, marketing, information systems, education, policy, hospitality and tourism, management, publishing, and nursing. The contributors acknowledge ChatGPT’s capabilities to enhance productivity and suggest that it is likely to offer significant gains in the banking, hospitality and tourism, and information technology industries, and enhance business activities, such as management and marketing. Nevertheless, they also consider its limitations, disruptions to practices, threats to privacy and security, and consequences of biases, misuse, and misinformation. However, opinion is split on whether ChatGPT’s use should be restricted or legislated. Drawing on these contributions, the article identifies questions requiring further research across three thematic areas: knowledge, transparency, and ethics; digital transformation of organisations and societies; and teaching, learning, and scholarly research. The avenues for further research include: identifying skills, resources, and capabilities needed to handle generative AI; examining biases of generative AI attributable to training datasets and processes; exploring business and societal contexts best suited for generative AI implementation; determining optimal combinations of human and generative AI for various tasks; identifying ways to assess accuracy of text produced by generative AI; and uncovering the ethical and legal issues in using generative AI across different contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 102642"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"236","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy\",\"authors\":\"Yogesh K. Dwivedi ,&nbsp;Nir Kshetri ,&nbsp;Laurie Hughes ,&nbsp;Emma Louise Slade ,&nbsp;Anand Jeyaraj ,&nbsp;Arpan Kumar Kar ,&nbsp;Abdullah M. Baabdullah ,&nbsp;Alex Koohang ,&nbsp;Vishnupriya Raghavan ,&nbsp;Manju Ahuja ,&nbsp;Hanaa Albanna ,&nbsp;Mousa Ahmad Albashrawi ,&nbsp;Adil S. Al-Busaidi ,&nbsp;Janarthanan Balakrishnan ,&nbsp;Yves Barlette ,&nbsp;Sriparna Basu ,&nbsp;Indranil Bose ,&nbsp;Laurence Brooks ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Buhalis ,&nbsp;Lemuria Carter ,&nbsp;Ryan Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Transformative artificially intelligent tools, such as ChatGPT, designed to generate sophisticated text indistinguishable from that produced by a human, are applicable across a wide range of contexts. The technology presents opportunities as well as, often ethical and legal, challenges, and has the potential for both positive and negative impacts for organisations, society, and individuals. Offering multi-disciplinary insight into some of these, this article brings together 43 contributions from experts in fields such as computer science, marketing, information systems, education, policy, hospitality and tourism, management, publishing, and nursing. The contributors acknowledge ChatGPT’s capabilities to enhance productivity and suggest that it is likely to offer significant gains in the banking, hospitality and tourism, and information technology industries, and enhance business activities, such as management and marketing. Nevertheless, they also consider its limitations, disruptions to practices, threats to privacy and security, and consequences of biases, misuse, and misinformation. However, opinion is split on whether ChatGPT’s use should be restricted or legislated. Drawing on these contributions, the article identifies questions requiring further research across three thematic areas: knowledge, transparency, and ethics; digital transformation of organisations and societies; and teaching, learning, and scholarly research. The avenues for further research include: identifying skills, resources, and capabilities needed to handle generative AI; examining biases of generative AI attributable to training datasets and processes; exploring business and societal contexts best suited for generative AI implementation; determining optimal combinations of human and generative AI for various tasks; identifying ways to assess accuracy of text produced by generative AI; and uncovering the ethical and legal issues in using generative AI across different contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information Management\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"236\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401223000233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401223000233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 236

摘要

革命性的人工智能工具,如ChatGPT,旨在生成与人类生成的文本难以区分的复杂文本,适用于广泛的上下文。这项技术带来了机遇,也带来了道德和法律上的挑战,并对组织、社会和个人产生了积极和消极的影响。本文汇集了来自计算机科学、市场营销、信息系统、教育、政策、酒店和旅游、管理、出版和护理等领域的43位专家的贡献,对其中一些问题提供了多学科的见解。提交方承认ChatGPT能够提高生产力,并认为它可能在银行、酒店和旅游业以及信息技术行业带来重大收益,并加强管理和营销等商业活动。然而,他们也考虑到它的局限性,对实践的破坏,对隐私和安全的威胁,以及偏见,滥用和错误信息的后果。然而,对于ChatGPT的使用是否应该受到限制或立法,意见分歧。根据这些贡献,本文确定了需要在三个主题领域进行进一步研究的问题:知识、透明度和道德;组织和社会的数字化转型;以及教学、学习和学术研究。进一步研究的途径包括:确定处理生成式人工智能所需的技能、资源和能力;检查可归因于训练数据集和过程的生成式人工智能的偏差;探索最适合生成式人工智能实施的商业和社会环境;为各种任务确定人类和生成人工智能的最佳组合;识别评估生成式人工智能生成的文本准确性的方法;并揭示在不同背景下使用生成式人工智能的伦理和法律问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy

Transformative artificially intelligent tools, such as ChatGPT, designed to generate sophisticated text indistinguishable from that produced by a human, are applicable across a wide range of contexts. The technology presents opportunities as well as, often ethical and legal, challenges, and has the potential for both positive and negative impacts for organisations, society, and individuals. Offering multi-disciplinary insight into some of these, this article brings together 43 contributions from experts in fields such as computer science, marketing, information systems, education, policy, hospitality and tourism, management, publishing, and nursing. The contributors acknowledge ChatGPT’s capabilities to enhance productivity and suggest that it is likely to offer significant gains in the banking, hospitality and tourism, and information technology industries, and enhance business activities, such as management and marketing. Nevertheless, they also consider its limitations, disruptions to practices, threats to privacy and security, and consequences of biases, misuse, and misinformation. However, opinion is split on whether ChatGPT’s use should be restricted or legislated. Drawing on these contributions, the article identifies questions requiring further research across three thematic areas: knowledge, transparency, and ethics; digital transformation of organisations and societies; and teaching, learning, and scholarly research. The avenues for further research include: identifying skills, resources, and capabilities needed to handle generative AI; examining biases of generative AI attributable to training datasets and processes; exploring business and societal contexts best suited for generative AI implementation; determining optimal combinations of human and generative AI for various tasks; identifying ways to assess accuracy of text produced by generative AI; and uncovering the ethical and legal issues in using generative AI across different contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信