中国大学英语学习者综合写作能力诊断:对数线性认知诊断模型研究

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kwangmin Lee
{"title":"中国大学英语学习者综合写作能力诊断:对数线性认知诊断模型研究","authors":"Kwangmin Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While a large body of research has been accumulated that provides reliability and validity evidence for L2 integrated writing tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to examine integrated writing tasks as a means to provide diagnostic insights for teachers and learners. The current study aims to fill in this lacuna by applying a log-linear cognitive diagnostic model (LCDM) to reading-to-write integrated writing data collected from 315 Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) examinees. For this study, the integrated writing task was conceptualized as consisting of <em>language use</em>, <em>source use</em>, and <em>content</em>, with each of these unobservable attributes measured by surrogate indicators. Results showed that all the pairs of postulated attributes were positively correlated. However, the association between <em>language use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.36) was not as strong as that of either <em>language use</em> and <em>source use</em> (r = 0.74) or <em>source use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.90). Also, item parameters indicated that <em>language use</em> is more important than other attributes for obtaining a passing score for writing features. Lastly, the test-taker classification showed that it is impossible to master <em>source use</em> without other attributes, demonstrating the dependence of <em>source use</em> on other attributes. Implications for teaching are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ integrated writing capability: A Log-linear Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (LCDM) study\",\"authors\":\"Kwangmin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While a large body of research has been accumulated that provides reliability and validity evidence for L2 integrated writing tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to examine integrated writing tasks as a means to provide diagnostic insights for teachers and learners. The current study aims to fill in this lacuna by applying a log-linear cognitive diagnostic model (LCDM) to reading-to-write integrated writing data collected from 315 Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) examinees. For this study, the integrated writing task was conceptualized as consisting of <em>language use</em>, <em>source use</em>, and <em>content</em>, with each of these unobservable attributes measured by surrogate indicators. Results showed that all the pairs of postulated attributes were positively correlated. However, the association between <em>language use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.36) was not as strong as that of either <em>language use</em> and <em>source use</em> (r = 0.74) or <em>source use</em> and <em>content</em> (r = 0.90). Also, item parameters indicated that <em>language use</em> is more important than other attributes for obtaining a passing score for writing features. Lastly, the test-taker classification showed that it is impossible to master <em>source use</em> without other attributes, demonstrating the dependence of <em>source use</em> on other attributes. Implications for teaching are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000387\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然已经积累了大量的研究,为第二语言综合写作任务提供了可靠性和有效性的证据,但很少有研究将综合写作任务作为一种为教师和学习者提供诊断性见解的手段。本研究旨在通过对数线性认知诊断模型(LCDM)对315名中国大学英语水平考生的读写综合写作数据进行分析,以填补这一空白。在这项研究中,综合写作任务被定义为由语言使用、来源使用和内容组成,每一个不可观察的属性都通过替代指标来衡量。结果表明,所有的假设属性对都是正相关的。然而,语言使用与内容之间的相关性(r = 0.36)不如语言使用与源语使用(r = 0.74)或源语使用与内容(r = 0.90)那么强。此外,项目参数表明,语言使用比其他属性更重要,以获得及格分数的写作特征。最后,考生分类表明,在没有其他属性的情况下,不可能掌握源的使用,说明源的使用对其他属性的依赖性。讨论了对教学的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosing Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ integrated writing capability: A Log-linear Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (LCDM) study

While a large body of research has been accumulated that provides reliability and validity evidence for L2 integrated writing tasks, relatively little research has been conducted to examine integrated writing tasks as a means to provide diagnostic insights for teachers and learners. The current study aims to fill in this lacuna by applying a log-linear cognitive diagnostic model (LCDM) to reading-to-write integrated writing data collected from 315 Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) examinees. For this study, the integrated writing task was conceptualized as consisting of language use, source use, and content, with each of these unobservable attributes measured by surrogate indicators. Results showed that all the pairs of postulated attributes were positively correlated. However, the association between language use and content (r = 0.36) was not as strong as that of either language use and source use (r = 0.74) or source use and content (r = 0.90). Also, item parameters indicated that language use is more important than other attributes for obtaining a passing score for writing features. Lastly, the test-taker classification showed that it is impossible to master source use without other attributes, demonstrating the dependence of source use on other attributes. Implications for teaching are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信